Grewal PS, Grewal KP, Grover D. A Literature Review of Different Criterias for Selecting and Cementing a post- A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(4):e321-4.

doi:10.4317/jced.3.e321

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.3.e321

 

 

References

1. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 380-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80002-X

 

2. Kurer HG, Combe EC, Grant AA. Factors influencing the retention of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38:515-25.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90026-9

 

3. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effect of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 400-05.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80156-5

 

4. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40: 645-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90063-X

 

5. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 218-23.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006

PMid:16543019

 

6. Nergiz I, Schmega P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 451-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70059-3

 

7. D'Arcangelo C, D�Amario M, Vadini M, De Angelis F, Caputi S. Influence of surface treatments on the flexure properties of fiber posts. J. Endodon. 2007; 33: 864-7

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.004

PMid:17804331

 

8. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13(3): E214-21

PMid:18305446

 

9. Chan FW, Harcourt JK. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J. 1993; 38: 39-45.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb05449.x

PMid:8447770

 

10. Mayhew JT, Windchy AM., Goldsmith LJ., Gettleman L. Effect of root canal sealers and irrigation agents on retention of preformed posts luted with resin cement. J Endod. 2000; 26(6): 341-4.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200006000-00008

PMid:11199751

 

11. Keles A, Koseoglu M. Dissolution of root canal sealers in EDTA and NaOCl solutions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140: 74-9

PMid:19119170

 

12. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 48: 292-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90014-2

 

13. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 602-9

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.018

PMid:16289722

 

14. Turner CH. The retention of dental posts. J Dent. 1982; 10(2): 154-65.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(82)80011-0

 

15. D'Arcangelo C, D�Amario M, Vadini M, De Angelis F, Caputi S. An evaluation of luting agent application technique effect on fibre post retention. J Dent. 2008; 36: 235-40

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.004

PMid:18289767