El-Angbawi AM, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR, Thomson DJ. Film and digital periapical radiographs for the measurement of apical root
shortening. J Clin Exp Dent.
2012;4(5):e281-5.
doi:10.4317/jced.50872
References
1. Hartsfield
JK, Everett ET, Al-Qawasmi RA. Genetic factors in external
apical root resorption and orthodontic treatment. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:115-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154411130401500205
PMid: 15059946
2. Sameshima,
GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical
vs. panoramic films. Angle Orthod.
2001;71:185-9.
PMid:11407770
3. Berkhout
E, Sanderink G, Van der Stelt P. Digital intra-oral radiography in dentistry. Diagnostic efficacy and dose considerations. Oral Radiol. 2003;19:1-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02493286
4. Wenzel A, Møystad
A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68:106-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016350903514426
PMid:20141365
5. Bhaskaran
V, Qualtrough AJ, Rushton
VE, Worthington HV, Horner K. A laboratory comparison of
three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
Int Endod J. 2005;38:645-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00998.x
PMid:16104978
6. Schmitd LB, Lima TD, Chinellato LEM, Bramante CM, Garcia
RB, De Moraes IG, et al. Comparison of radiographic
measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during
endodontic treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:167-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200016
PMid:19089211
7. Dudic
A, Giannopoulou C, Martinez M, Montet
X, Kiliaridis S. Diagnostic accuracy of digitized periapical radiographs validated against micro-computed
tomography scanning in evaluating orthodontically
induced apical root resorption. Eur
J Oral Sci. 2008;116:467-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00559.x
PMid:18821990
8. Versteeg
CH, Sanderink GC, Van der Stelt P. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in
clinical dentistry. J Dent. 1997;25:215-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00026-7
PMid: 9175348
9. Kamburoğlu
K, Barenboim S, Kaffe I. Comparison of conventional
film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of
simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo
study in human cadaver jaws. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2008;105:790-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.030
PMid:17942339
10. Westphalen
V, Gomes de Moraes I, Westphalen
FH, Martins WD, Souza PH. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the
detection of simulated external root resorptions: a
comparative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:233-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/65487937
PMid:15533976
11. Levander
E, Bajka R, Malmgren O.
Early radiographic diagnosis of apical root resorption
during orthodontic treatment: a study of maxillary incisors. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:57-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.4.427
PMid: 9558765
12. Borg E, Källqvist
A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H.
Film and digital radiography for detection of simulated root resorption cavities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86:110-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90159-7
PMid: 9690255
13. Cederberg
RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison
of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:325-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90017-8
PMid: 9540092
14. Ong EY, Pitt Ford TR. Comparison of radiovisiography
with radiographic film in root length determination. Int Endod J. 1995;28:25-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00152.x
PMid:7642325
15. Velders
X. [100 years of x-rays: increase in image quality of intra-oral radiographs,
decrease in patient exposure]. Ned TijdschrTandheelkd.
1995;102:471-5.
PMid:11836815