Singh R, Singh J, Gambhir RS, Singh R, Nanda S. Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(3):e138-43.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.51134

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.51134

 

References

1. Petrie CS, Walker MP, O'Mahony A, Spencer P. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist and wet conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:365-72.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00515-8                                                        

PMid:14564291

 

2. O'Mahony A, Spencer P, Williams K, Corcoran J. Effect of three medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of poly vinyl siloxane impressions. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:201-6.

PMid:11203927                                                                   

                                                                     

3. German MJ, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):951-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.010

PMid:18164051                                                                   

                                                                     

4. Reitz CD, Clark NP. The setting of vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone putties when mixed with gloved hands. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;116:371-5.

PMid:3162493                                                     

                                                                     

5. Noonan JE, Goldfogel MH and Lambert RL. Inhibited set of the surface of addition silicones in contact with rubber dam. Oper dent. 1985;10:46-8.

PMid:3862077                                                     

                                                                     

6. Duncan JD. Prevention of catalyst contamination of vinyl polysiloxane silicone impression material during the impression procedure. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(2):277.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80064-2                                                        

PMid:1774694

 

7. Wassell RW, Barker D, Walls AW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique. Br Dent J. 2002;192(12):679-84.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801456

PMid:12125794                                                                   

                                                                     

8. de Camargo LM, Chee WW, Donovan TE. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:114-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90003-7                                                          

PMid: 8371173

 

9. S‡bio S, Franciscone PA, Mondelli J. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:280-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000400010

PMid:19089261                                                                   

                                                                     

10. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Boyacioglu H. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(2):92-8.                              

PMid: 17510720

 

11. Lepe X, Johnson GH, Berg JC, Aw TC. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristic of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:495-502.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70168-4

PMid: 9597600

                                                                     

12. Mandikos MN. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J. 1998;43(6):428-34.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb00204.x

PMid:9973714                                                     

                                                                     

13. Chee WWL, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:728-32.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90192-D                                                          

 PMid: 1432791

 

14. Kimoto K, Tanaka K, Toyoda M, Ochiai KT. Indirect latex gloves contamination and its inhibitory effect on vinyl polysiloxane polymerization. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:433-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.015

PMid:15867752                                                                   

                                                                     

15. Johnson GH, Lepe X, Aw TC. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:354-64.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00429-3                                                        

 PMid: 14564290

 

16. Csempesz F, Vag J, FazekasA. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:45-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.61

PMid:12589285                                                                   

                                                                     

17. Walker MP, Petrie CS, Haj-Ali R, Spencer P, Dumas C, Williams K. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction. J Prosthodont. 2005;14(3):158-63.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.04024.x

PMid:16336232                                                                   

                                                                     

18. Browning GC, Bromme JC Jr, Murchison DF. Removal of latex glove contaminants prior to taking poly vinyl siloxane impressions. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25(11):787-90.

PMid:7568684                                                     

                                                                     

19. Vinyl polysiloxane impression materials: a status report. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assos. I990; 120:595-6,598,600.

 PMid: 2186077

 

20. Machado CEP, Guedes CG. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(6):628-33.

PMid:22230998