Poonacha V, Poonacha S, Salagundi
B, P-L R, Raghavan R. In vitro comparison
of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics. J Clin Exp Dent.
2013;5(5):e212-7.
doi:10.4317/jced.51136
References
1.
Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold
AM, Vargas MA. Flexural strength
of provisional crown and fixed
partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:225-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121406
PMid:11854681
2.
Strassler HE. Fixed prosthodontics provisional materials:
making the right selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34:22-4, 26.
PMid:23550328
3.
Wassell RW, St George G, Ingledew RP, Steele JG. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: provisional restorations.
Br Dent J. 2002;192:619-22, 625-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801316
PMid:12108942
4.
Koumjian JH, Nimmo A. Evaluation of fracture resistance
of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent.1990;64:654-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90290-S
PMid:2079670
5.
Perry RD, Magnuson B. Provisional materials:
key components of interim fixed restorations.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33:59-60, 62.
PMid:22432178
6.
Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization
of artificial enamel lesions
in vitro. II. Determination of activation
energy and reaction order. Caries Res. 1978;12:213-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000260335
PMid:28847
7.
Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative
in vitro evaluation of two
provisional restorative materials.
J Prosthet Dent.
2001;85:129-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112797
PMid:11208201
8.
Osman YI, Owen CP. Flexural
strength of provisional restorative
materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:94-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90038-P
PMid: 8366461
9.
Scherrer SS, Wiskott AH,
Coto-Hunziker V, Belser UC.
Monotonic flexure and
fatigue strength of composites
for provisional and definitive
restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:579-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00174-4
PMid: 12815352
10.
Ireland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding
LC, Ramp MH. In vitro mechanical
property comparison of four resins used
for the fabrication
of provisional fixed restorations.
J Prosthet Dent.
1998;80:158-62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70104-0
PMid: 9710816
11.
Asad T, Watkinson AC, Huggett
R. The effect of disinfection procedures on flexural properties
of denture base acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:191-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90303-R
PMid: 1403907
12.
Akova T, Ozkomur A, Uysal H. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical
properties of provisional restorative
materials. Dent Mater.
2006;22:1130-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.09.009
PMid:16386787
13.
Larson WR, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA, Clancy
JM. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength
of provisional crown and fixed
partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:816-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90425-V
PMid: 1805039
14.
Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD.
In vitro comparative evaluation
of the effect of two different fiber
reinforcements on the fracture toughness of
provisional restorative resins.
Indian J Dent Res.
2012;23:140-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100415
PMid:22945699
15.
Ogle RE, Sorensen SE, Lewis
EA. A new visible light-cure resin system applied to removable prosthodontics.
J Prosthet Dent.
1986;56:497-506.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90397-5
PMid: 3463760