Amaral P, Forner L, Llena C. Smear layer removal in canals shaped with reciprocating rotary systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(5):e227-30.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.51170

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.51170

 

References

1. Yared G. Clinical article Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2007;4:339-44.                                                   

PMid:18081803 

                                                    

2. Wu M, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1995;79:492-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80134-9                                                        

PMid: 7614212

                                                                     

3. Huismann M, Peters OA, Dummer PH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10:30-76.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x                                                     

                                                                     

4. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effects of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975;1:255-62.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9                                                        

PMid: 10697472

                                                                     

5. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel NiTi alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of Profile 25/0.04 rotatory instruments. J Endod. 2008;34:1406-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029

PMid:18928858                                                                   

                                                                     

6. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic Fatigue analysis of a new generation of NiTI rotator instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:401-3.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.010

PMid:19249604                                                                   

                                                                     

7. Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of Cyclic Flexural Fatigue of MWire NiTi Rotatory Instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:305-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.032

PMid:20113796                                                                   

                                                                     

8. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotatory NiTi instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34:1406-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007

PMid:18634935                                                                   

                                                                     

9. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotatory NiTi endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2004;30:722-5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129963.42882.C9

PMid:15448468                                                                   

                                                                     

10. Zand V, Lotfi M, Rahimi S, Mokhtari H, Kazemi A, Sakhamanesh V. Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopic Investigation of the Smear Layer after the Use of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Solution Forms as Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod. 2010;36:1234-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.033

PMid:20630306                                                                   

                                                                     

11. Uroz-Torres D, Gonz‡lez-Rodr’guez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in Removing the Smear Layer after Root Canal Instrumentation. J Endod. 2010;36:308-11.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029

PMid:20113797                                                                   

                                                                     

12. Khedmat S, Shokouhinejad N. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Chelating Agents in Smear Layer Removal. J Endod. 2008;34:599-602.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.023

PMid:18436043                                                                   

                                                                     

13. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The SAF: Part 1: Respecting the Root Canal Anatomy - A new concept of Endodontic Files and its Implementation. J Endod. 2010;36,679-89.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036

PMid:20307744                                                                   

                                                                     

14. Peters OA, Boessler C, PaquŽ F. Root canal preparation with a novel Ni-Ti instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: canal surface preparation over Time. J Endod. 2010;36:1068-72.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.023

PMid:20478468                                                                    

                                                                     

15. De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi RQ, et al. Suboptimal Debridement Quality Produced by the Single-file F2 Protaper Technique in Oval-shaped Canals. J Endod. 2010;36:1897-900.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.009

PMid:20951309                                                                   

                                                                     

16. Bonetti Filho I, Miranda Esberard R, de Toledo Leonardo R, del Rio CE. Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre and postinstrumentation, J Endod. 1998;24:461-3.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80046-0                                                        

PMid: 9693570

                                                                     

17. BŸrklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, SchŠfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45:449-61.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x

PMid:22188401                                                                   

                                                                     

18. BŸrklein S, SchŠfer E. Apically Extruded Debris with Reciprocating Single-File and Full-sequence Rotary Instrumentation Systems. J Endod. 2012;38:850-2.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.017

PMid:22595125                                                                   

                                                                     

19. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Banegas G. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 2005;38:356-63.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00938.x

PMid:15910470                                                                   

                                                                     

20. Leow N, Abbott P, Castro Salgado J, Firth L. Evaluation of smear layer removal by bicarbonate soda, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with cetrimide and sodium hypochlorite with a new model. Aust Endod J. 2012;38:107-12.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2012.00368.x

PMid:23211069                                                                   

                                                                     

21. Santos Felippe MC, Vitor C, Cristina S, Tadeu W. Removal of intracanal smear layer by doxycycline: SEM analysis. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:64-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00191.x

PMid:20666751                                                                   

                                                                     

22. Kuzekanani M, Walsh LJ, Yousefi MA. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs. ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:268-7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.57355

PMid:19884706