Maglione M, Costantinides F, Bazzocchi G. Classification
of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT
images. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(2):e224-31.
doi:10.4317/jced.51984
References
1. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira
e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and
conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between
impacted lower third molars and the mandibular
canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1030-37. |
|
|
|
2. Tantanapornkul
W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y,
Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam
computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the
topographic relationship between the mandibular
canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253-9. |
|
|
|
3. Dawood A, Brown J, Sauret-Jackson
V, Purkayastha S. Optimization of cone beam CT
exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site. Dentomaxillofac
Radiol. 2012;41:70-4. |
|
|
|
4. Durack C, Patel S. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Braz Dent J. 2012;23:179-91. |
|
|
|
5. Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, Hernandez Soler V,
Martin C. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:230-42. |
|
|
|
6. Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake
F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland
M. Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative
cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:412-7. |
|
|
|
7. Kadkhodazadeh M, Amid R. A new classification for the
relationship between periodontal, periapical, and peri-implant complications. Iran Endod
J. 2013;8:103-8. |
|
|
|
8. Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with
surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2714-21. |
|
|
|
9. Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC,
Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of
removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol
Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e376-80. |
|
|
|
10. Freudlsperger C, Deiss T, Bodem J, Engel M, Hoffmann J. Influence of lower third
molar anatomic position on postoperative inflammatory complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1280-5. |
|
|
|
11. Almendros-Marqués N, Berini-Aytés
L, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of intraexaminer
and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower
third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:893-9. |
|
|
|
12. Rood JP,
Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior
alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20-5. PMid:2322523 |
|
|
|
13. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson
TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic
relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2008;66:1678-85. |
|
|
|
14. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic
radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure
following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2005;63:3-7. |
|
|
|
15. Jhamb A, Dolas RS, Pandilwar PK, Mohanty S.
Comparative efficacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography
in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neurovascular
bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:58-66. |
|
|
|
16. Flygare L, Ohman A.
Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291-302. |
|
|
|
17. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS.
Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation
of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:276-84. |
|
|
|
18. Nakayama
K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y,
Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Izumi K, et al. Assessment of the relationship between
impacted mandibular third molars and inferior
alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2587-91. |
|
|
|
19. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi
A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J,
Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in
relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic
accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic
radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2009;38:964-71. |
|
|
|
20. Sammartino G, Wang HL, Citarella
R, Lepore M, Marenzi G.
Analysis of occlusal stresses transmitted to the
inferior alveolar nerve by multiple threaded implants. J Periodontol.
2013;84:1655-61. PMid:23347345 |
|
|
|
21. Martí E, Pe-arrocha M, García B, Martínez JM, Gay-Escoda C. Distance between periapical
lesion and mandibular canal as a factor in periapical surgery in mandibular
molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2461-6. |
|
|
|
22. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Cortical
integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc.
2010;141:271-8. |
|
|
|
23. Susarla SM, Sidhu HK, Avery LL,
Dodson TB. Does computed tomographic assessment of
inferior alveolar canal cortical integrity predict nerve exposure during
third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1296-1303. |
|
|
|
24. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng
YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2002;35:56-62. |
|
|
|
25. Nakagawa
Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of
panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1303-8. |