Llena C, Cuesta C, Forner L, Mozo S, Segura JJ. The effect
of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite
in canal wall cleaning. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(1):e69-73.
doi:10.4317/jced.52088
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52088
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
|
1. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay
FR. Review of contemporary irrigation agitation techniques and devices. J
Endod. 2009;35,791-804. |
|
|
2. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various
intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod. 2009;35:545-9. |
|
3.
Akisue E, Tomita VS, Gavini G, Poli de Figueiredo JA. Effect of the combination of
sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on dentinal permeability and scanning
electron microscopy precipitate observation.. J Endod. 2010;36:847-50.
|
|
|
4. Al-Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M. Necrotic
pulp dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory
Canals: impact of canal location and angulation. Int Endod J. 2009;42:59-65. |
|
|
5. Townsend C, Maki J. An in vitro comparison of new
irrigation and agitation techniques to ultrasonic agitation in removing
bacteria from a simulated root canal. J Endod. 2009;35:1040-3. |
|
|
6. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The effectiveness of
ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from
different-sized simulated plastic root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:607-12. |
|
|
7. Abbott PV, Heijkoop PS, Cardaci SC, Hume WR,
Heithersay GS. An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation sequences
and ultrasonics. Int Endod J. 1991;24:308-16. |
|
|
8. Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M.
Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid
irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J. 2009;42:335-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Munley PJ, Goodell GG. Comparison of passive
ultrasonic debridement between fluted and nonfluted Instruments in root
canals. J Endod. 2007;33:578-80. |
|
|
10. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink
PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the
literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40:415-26. |
|
|
11. van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A
comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed
dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
Int Endod J. 2005;38:593-6. |
|
|
12. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F.
Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2007;33:81-95. |
|
|
13. Weber C, Scott B, McClanahan, Miller GA, Diener-West
M, Johnson JD. The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2%
chlorhexidine or 5,25% sodium hypochlorite on residual antimicrobial activity
in root canals. J
Endod. 2003;29:562-4. |
|
|
14. Hülsmann M, Stotz S.Efficacy, cleaning ability
and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal
retreatment. Int Endod J. 1997;30:227-33. |
|
|
15. de Deus G, Reis C, Paciornik S. Critical
appraisal of published smear layer-removal studies: methodological issues.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:531-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G.
Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper
technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011;37:1394-7. |
|
|
17. Castelo-Baz P, Martín-Biedma B, Cantatore G, Ruíz-Piñón
M, Bahillo J, Rivas-Mundiña B, et al. In vitro
comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in simulated
lateral canals of extracted teeth. J Endod. 2012;38:688-91. PMID:22515904 |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Ghivari S, Kubasad G. Root canal debris removal
using different irrigating needles: an SEM study. Indian J Dent Res.
2011;22:659-63. |
|
|
19. Yang G, Wu H, Zheng Y, Zhang H, Li H, Zhou X.
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining
following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with
NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
2008;106:e63-71. |
|
20. Kalyoncuoğlu E, Demiryürek EÖ. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal from teeth with different irrigation solutions and lasers. Microsc Microanal. 2013;19:1465-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1431927613012762. PMID: 23931128. |
|
|
21. Castagna F, Rizzon
P, Da Rosa RA, Santini MF, Barreto MS, Duarte MA, et al. Effect
Of Passive Ultrassonic Instrumentation As A Final Irrigation Protocol On
Debris And Smear Layer Removal--A Sem Analysis. Microsc Res Tech.
2013;76:496-502. |
|
|
22. de Moor
RJ, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and
cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2:
evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:520-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. de Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A,
Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to
remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod. 2010;6:1580-3 |
|
|
24. Cameron JA. Factors affecting the clinical
efficiency of ultrasonic endodontics: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Int Endod J. 1995;28:47-53. |
|
|
25.
Ferreira RB, Marchesan MA, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto M. Effectiveness of
root canal debris removal using passive ultrasound irrigation with
chlorhexidine digluconate or sodium hypochlorite individually or in
combination as irrigants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;1:68-75. PMID: 18633471 |
|
|
|
|
|
26. van der Sluis LW, Vogels PJM, Verhaagen B,
Macedo R, Wesselink PR. Study on the influence of Refreshment/Activation
Cycles and Irrigations on Mechanical Cleaning Efficiency During Ultrasonic
Activation of the Irrigation. J Endod. 2010;36:737-40. |
|
|
27. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Paranjpe
A, Cohenca N. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the
penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to
working length: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36:1216-21. |
|
|
28. de Vasconcelos BC, Luna-Cruz SM, De-Deus G, de
Moraes IG, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Gurgel-Filho ED.Cleaning ability of
chlorhexidine gel and sodium hypochlorite associated or not with EDTA as root
canal irrigants: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Appl Oral Sci.
2007;15:387-91. |
|
|
29. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho
P, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vivo antimicrobial activity of
2% chlorhexidine used as root canal irrigating solution. J Endod.
1999;25:167-71. PMID:10321180 |
|
|
|
|
|
30. Alves FR, BM, Neves MA, Moreno JO, Rôças IN,
Siqueira JF Jr. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of
different supplementary approaches. J Endod. 2011;37:496-501. |
|
|
31. Ahangari Z, Samiee M, Yolmeh MA, Eslami
G.Antimicrobial activity of three root canal irrigants on enterococcus faecalis:
an in vitro study. Iran
Endod J. 2008;3:33-7. |
|
|
32. Baca P,
Mendoza-Llamas ML, Arias-Moliz MT, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Residual
effectiveness of final irrigation regimens on Enteroccus faecalis-infected
root canals. J Endod. 2011;37:1121-3. |
|
|
33. Jensen
SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of
passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand
instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 1999;25:735-8. PMID:10726540 |
|
|
34. Burleson A, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. The In
Vivo Evaluation Of Hand/Rotary/ Ultrasound Instrumentation In Necrotic, Human
Mandibular Molars. J
Endod. 2007;33:782–7. |
|