Requena-Calla S, Funes-Rumiche I. Effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing dry socket following surgical
extraction of lower third molars. A pilot
study. J Clin Exp Dent.
2016;8(2):e160-3.
doi:10.4317/jced.52444
References
1. Hedström
L, Sjögren P. Effect estimates and methodological
quality of randomized controlled trials about prevention of alveolar osteítis following tooth extraction: a systematic review.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:8-15. |
|
|
|
2. Minguez-Serra MP, Salort-Llorca C , Silvestre-Donat FJ. Chlorhexidine in the prevention of dry socket: Effectiveness of different dosage forms and regimens. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:445-9.PMid:19718007 |
|
|
|
3. Blum IR. Contemporary
views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical
appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and
management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:309-17. |
|
|
|
4. Ragno
JR Jr, Szkutnik AJ. Evaluation
of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of
alveolar osteítis. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;72:524-6. PMid:1745508 |
|
|
|
5. Larsen PE. The effect
of a chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of
alveolar osteítis following the surgical removal of
impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:932-7. PMid:1886022 |
|
|
|
6. Hermesch
CB, Hilton
TJ, Biesbrock
AR, Baker
RA, Cain-Hamlin
J, McClanahan
SF, et al. Perioperative use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the
prevention of alveolar osteitis: efficacy and risk
factor analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:381-7. PMid:9574945 |
|
|
|
7. Metin
M, Tek M, Sener
I. Comparison of two chlorhexidine rinse protocols
on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the
surgical removal of impacted third molars. J Contemp
Dent Pract. 2006;7:79-86. |
|
|
|
8.
Torres LD, Infante CP, Gutierrez PJ. Randomized, double-blind study on effectiveness of
intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing the
incidence of alveolar osteítis in mandibular third molar surgery. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:348-51. |
|
|
|
9. Hita
IP, Torres LD, Flores RR. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine
gel versus chlorhexidine rinse in reducing alveolar
osteítis in mandibular
third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:441-5. |
|
|
|
10. Haraji
A, Rakhshan V. Chlorhexidine
gel and less difficult surgeries might reduce post-operative pain,
controlling for dry socket, infection and analgesic consumption: a
split-mouth controlled randomised clinical trial. J
Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:209-19. PMid:25251411 |
|
|
|
11. Gbotolorum
OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde
AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Maxillofac
Oral Surg. 2007;65:1977-83. |
|
|
|
12. Lopes CC, Vicente RM,
Ferreira JO. Clinical concepts of dry socket. J Maxillofac
Oral Surg. 2010;68:1922-32. |
|
|
|
13. Haraji
A, Lassemi
E, Motamedi
MH, Alavi
M, Adibnejad
S. Effect of plasma rich in growth factors on
alveolar osteítis. Natl J
Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3:38-41. |
|
|
|
14. Tek
M, Akkas
I, Toptas
O, Ozan
F, Sener
I, Bereket
C. Effects of the topical hemostatic
agent Ankaferd Blood Stopper on the incidence of
alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of an
impacted mandibular third molar. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17:75-80. |
|
|
|
15.
Rodríguez-Pérez M, Bravo-Pérez M, Sánchez-López JD, Muñoz-Soto E, Romero-Olid MN, Baca-García P. Effectiveness of 1% versus 0.2% chlorhexidine
gels in reducing alveolar osteitis from mandibular third molar surgery: A randomized,
double-blind clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral
Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e693-700. PMid:23722126 PMCid:PMC3731100 |
|
|
|
16. Sridhar V, Wali G, Shyla H. Evaluation of
the Perioperative Use of 0.2% Chlorhexidine
Gluconate for the Prevention of Alveolar Osteitis After the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Clinical Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10:101-11. |
|
|
|
17.
de Santana-Santos T, de Souza-Santos aA, Martins-Filho PR, da Silva LC, de Oliveira E Silva ED, Gomes AC. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain
and trismus following third molar surgery based on
preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e65-70. PMid:23229245 |
|
|
|
18. Eshghpour
M, Nejat AH. Dry socket following surgical removal
of impacted third molar in an Iranian population: Incidence and risk factors.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2013;16:496-500. |
|
|
|
19. Oginni
FO, Fatusi OA, Alagbe AO.
A clinical evaluation of dry socket in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:871-6. PMid:12905436 |
|
|
|
20. Haraji
A, Rakhshan V. Single-dose intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel application, easier surgeries, and
younger ages are associated with reduced dry socket risk. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:259-65.
Epub 2013 Oct 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.023 PMid:24438596 |
|
|
|
21.
Torres LD, Infante CP, Gutierrez PJ. Gel de Clorhexidina intra-alveolar en
la prevención de la alveolitis tras la extracción de terceros molares
inferiores. Estudio piloto. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:179-84. 22. Haraji
A, Rakhshan V. Chlorhexidine
gel and less difficult surgeries might reduce post-operative pain,
controlling for dry socket, infection and analgesic consumption: a
split-mouth controlled randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:209-19. |