Jayasenthil A, Solomon-Sathish E, Venkatalakshmi-Aparna P, Balagopal S. Fracture resistance of tooth restored with four glass fiber post systems of varying surface geometries-An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):e44-8.

doi:10.4317/jced.52491

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52491

References

1. Maccari PC, Conceicao EN, Nunes MF. Fracture Resistance of Endodonticallv Treated Teeth Restored with Three Different Prefabricated Esthetic Posts. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15:25-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00279.x
PMid:12638770

2. Soares CJ , Soares PV, de Freitas Santos-Filho PC, Castro CG, Magalhaes D, Versluis A. The Influence of Cavity Design and Glass Fiber Posts on Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Premolars. J Endod. 2008;34:1015-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.017
PMid:18634938

3. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ. Influence of Cavity Preparation Design on Fracture Resistance of Posterior Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic Restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:421-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.022
PMid:16765154

4. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of Restorative Technique on the Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:30-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60006-2

PMid:18182183

5. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999;27:275-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00066-9

PMid:10193104

6. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-Point Bending Test of Fiber Posts. J Endod. 2001;27:758-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00011
PMid:11771584

7. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and Stress Distribution of Tapered-End Endodontic Posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:504-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90028-4

PMid:3519941

8. Craig RG, Farah JW. Stress Analysis and Design of Single Restorations and Fixed Bridges. Oral Sci Rev. 1977;10:45-74.
PMid:335306

9. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of Post Adaptation on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:419-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90037-D

PMid:2231450

10. Texeira EC, Texeira FB, Piasick JR, Thompson JY. An In Vitro Assessment of Prefabricated Fiber Post Systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1006-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0323

PMid:16803828

11. Buttel L, Krastl G, Lorch H, Naumann M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R. Influence of Post Fit and Post Length on Fracture Resistance. Int Endod J. 2009;42:47-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01492.x
PMid:19125979

12. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of Different Rotary Instruments for Gutta-Percha Removal in Root Canal Retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32:469-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.052
PMid:16631851

13. Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM, Burnett LH Jr, Shinkai RS. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Flared Root Canals and Restored with Different Post Systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19:30-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00060.x
PMid:17244147

14. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors Affecting the Fracture Resistance of Post-Core Reconstructed Teeth: A Review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:355-63.
PMid:11508092

15. Al-harbi F, Nathanson D. In Vitro Assessment of Retention of Four Esthetic Dowels To Resin Core Foundation and Teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:547-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.014
PMid:14668755

16. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of Surface Treatment on Retention of Glass-Fiber Endodontic Posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:218-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.006
PMid:16543019

17. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Post-Surface Conditioning Improves Interfacial Adhesion in Post/Core Restorations. Dent Mater. 2006;22:602-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.018
PMid:16289722

18. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR, et al. The Adhesion between Fibre Posts and Composite Resin Core: The Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength Following Various Surface Chemical Treatments to Posts. Int Endod J. 2006;39:31-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01044.x
PMid:16409326

19. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Influence of root Embedment Material and Periodontal Ligament Simulation on Fracture Resistance Tests. Braz Oral Res. 2005;19:11-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242005000100003
PMid:16229350

20. Reinhardt RA, Krejici RF, Pao YC, Stannard JG. Dentin Stresses in Post-Reconstructed Teeth With Diminishing Bone Support. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1002-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620090101
PMid:6348112

21. Davy DT, Dilley GL, Krejci RF. Determination of Stress Patterns in Root-Filled Teeth Incorporating Various Dowel Designs. J Dent Res 1981;60:1301-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600070301
PMid:7016944

22. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb JP. The Dentatus Screw: Comparative Stress Analysis with Other Endodontic Dowel Designs. J Oral Rehabil. 1982;9:23-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb00531.x
PMid:7038066

23. Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen NN. Stress-Strain Response in Human Dentine: Rethinking Fracture Predilection in Postcore Restored Teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20:90-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00250.x
PMid:15025691

24. Madfa AA, Kadir MR, Kashani J, Saidin S, Sulaiman E, Marhazlinda J, et al. Stress distributions in maxillary central incisors restored with various types of post materials and designs. Med Eng Phys. 2014;6:962-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.03.018
PMid:24834856

25. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:355-63.
PMid:11508092