Thoppe-Dhamodharan YK, Asokan S, John BJ, Pollachi-Ramakrishnan
G, Ramachandran P, Vilvanathan
P. Cartridge syringe vs
computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system: Pain related behaviour over two sequential visits – a randomized
controlled trial. J Clin Exp
Dent. 2015;7(4):e513-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.52542
References
|
1. Hembrecht
EJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, Aartman
IHA, Krikken J, Veerkamp
JSJ. Pain-related behaviour in children: a randomised study during two sequential dental visits. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:3-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Klingberg
G, Berggren U, Carlsson SG, Noren
JG. Child dental fear: cause-related factors and clinical effects. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:405-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Venham
LL, Gaulin-Kremer E, Munster E, Bengston-Audia
D, Cohan J, Interval rating scales for children's dental anxiety and uncooperative
behaviour. Pediatr Dent. 1980;2:195-202. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Asarch
T, Allen K, Peterson B, Beiraghi S. Efficacy of
computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 1999; 21:421-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Gibson RS, Allen K, Hutfless S, Beiraghi S. The
CCLAD vs traditional injection: A comparison of
pain related behaviours. Pediatr
Dent. 2000;22:458-62. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Allen KD, Kotil D, Larzelere RE, Hutfless S, Beiswanger BB.
Comparison of computerised anesthesia device with a
traditional syringe in preschool children. Pediatr
Dent. 2002;24:315-20. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Ram D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local
anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (CCLAD) and a conventional
syringe. J
Dent Child. 2003;70:130-3. PMid:14528773 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Martin-Lopez AL, Garrigos-Esparza
LD, Torre Delgadillo G, Gordillo-Moscoso A, Hernandez-Sierra
JF. Clinical comparison of pain perception rates between
computerized local anesthesia and conventional syringe in pediatric patients.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29:239-43. PMid:15926441 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Tahmassebi
JF, Nikolaou M, Duggal MS. A comparison of pain and
anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with
CCLAD and conventional technique. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:77-82. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Langthasa
M, Yeluri R, Jain AA, Munshi
AK. Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control
syringe and conventional injection technique during pediatric dental
procedures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev
Dent. 2012;30:323-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Versloot
J, Veerkamp JSJ, Hoogstraten
J. Pain behaviour and stress in children during two
sequential dental visits: comparing a computerized anesthesia system and a
traditional syringe. Br Dent J. 2008;205:1-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Hochman
MN. In vitro study of needle deflection: A linear insertion technique versus
a bidirectional rotational insertion technique. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:33-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Ram D, Berson T, Moskovitz M, Efrat J. Unsweetened ice popsicles impart a positive
feeling and reduce self-mutilation after paediatric
dental treatment with local anaesthesia. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2010;20:382-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Palm AM, Kirkegaard U, Poulsen S, Odont. The CCLAD
versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve
block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:481-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess
child dental anxiety. Int J Pediatr
Dent. 2002;12:47-52. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Buchanan H.
Development of computerised dental anxiety scale
for children: validation and reliability. Br Dent J. 2005;199:359-62. |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Voepel-Lewis
T, Zanotti J, Dammeyer
JA, Merkel S. Reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in
critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19:55-61. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Chapman HR, Kirby-Turner
NC. Dental Fear in Children – a proposed model. Br Dent J. 1999;187:408-12. PMid:10715999 |
|