Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban
A, Emadi N. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and
dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular
first molars. J Clin Exp Dent.
2016;8(1):e1-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.52570
References
1. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X,
Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PMH.
Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in
a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod
J. 2011;44:162-9. |
|
|
|
2. Tachibana H, Matsumoto
K. Applicability of X-ray computerized tomography in endodontics.
Endod Dent Traumatol.
1990;6:16-20. |
|
|
|
3. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, Carnes DL, Lancaster J. Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed
endodontic research. J
Endod. 1995;21:561-8. PMid:8601767 |
|
|
|
4. Rhodes J, Ford T, Lynch
J, Liepins P, Curtis R. Micro-computed tomography:
a new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endod J. 1999;32:165-70. |
|
|
|
5. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford
T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative
radiographic systems. Int Endod
J. 2009;42:447-62. |
|
|
|
6.
Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar
AHG, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption
by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod.
2009;35:1491-7. |
|
|
|
7. Tarazona-Álvarez
P, Romero-Millán J, Peñarrocha-Oltra
D, Fuster-Torres MÁ, Tarazona
B, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam
computed tomography and digital calipers. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2014;6:e271-4. |
|
|
|
8. Fatemitabar
SA, Nikgoo A. Multichannel computed tomography
versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro
measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:499-505. |
|
|
|
9. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT
derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:150-7. |
|
|
|
10.Kamburoğlu K, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Kılıç C, Özen T, Paksoy CS. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull. J
Digit Imaging. 2011;24:787-93. |
|
|
|
11. Periago
DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M,
Scheetz JP, Silveira AM,
Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived
3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering
program. Angle Orthod.
2008;78:387-95. |
|
|
|
12. Benninger
B, Peterson A, Cook V. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width
from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral
surgery. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2012;70:302-6. |
|
|
|
13. Sherrard
JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root
lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S100-S8. |
|
|
|
14. Stratemann
S, Huang J, Maki K, Miller A, Hatcher D. Comparison of cone beam computed
tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93. |
|
|
|
15. Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A.
Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based
diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26:813-20. |
|
|
|
16. Gu
Y, Zhou P, Ding Y, Wang P, Ni L. Root Canal Morphology of Permanent Three-rooted
Mandibular First Molars: Part III—An Odontometric Analysis. J Endod.
2011;37:485-90. |
|
|
|
17. Bellucci
C, Perrini N.A study on the thickness of radicular dentine and in anterior and premolar teeth. Int Endod J. 2002;35:594-606. |
|
|
|
18. Caputo A, Standlee J. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20:299-311. |
|
|
|
19.
Souza E, Bretas R, Cenci
M, Maia-Filho E, Bonetti-Filho.
Periapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness
during post space preparation. Int Endod J. 2008;41:658-63. |
|
|
|
20. Schwartz RS, Robbins
JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically
treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod.
2004;30:289-301. |
|
|
|
21.
Sanfelice CM, da Costa FB, Só
MVR, Vier-Pelisser F, Bier
CAS, Grecca FS. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone
beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2010;36:858-61. |
|
|
|
22. Kessler JR, Peters DD,
Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using
various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod.
1983;9:439-47. PMid:6579170 |
|
|
|
23. Lim S, Stock C. The
risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature
filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J. 1987;20:33-9. |
|
|
|
24. Tabrizizadeh
M, Reuben J, Khalesi M, Mousavinasab
M, Ezabadi MKG. Evaluation of Radicular
Dentin Thickness of Danger Zone in Mandibular First
Molars. J
Dent (Tehran). 2010;7:196-9. PMid:21998796 |
|
|
|
25. de Pablo OV, Estevez
R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N.
Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular
first molar: clinical implications and recommendations. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:15-27. |
|
|
|
26. Demirbuga
S, Sekerci AE, Dincer AN,
Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO.
Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of
mandibular first and second molars in Turkish
individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e737-44. |
|
|
|
27. Jou
YT, Karabucak B, Levin J, Liu D. Endodontic working
width: current concepts and techniques. Dent Clin
North Am. 2004;48:323-35. |
|
|
|
28. Wu MK, R'oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals
in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:739-43. PMid:10846130 |
|
|
|
29. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R,
Hof R. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal
anatomy-a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod. 2010;36:679-90. 30. Council on Dental
Materials I, Equipment. Revised ANSI/ADA specifications no. 28* for root
canal files and reamers, type K, and no. 58+ for root canal files, type H (Hedstrom). J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118:239-40. |