Rico-Romano C, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Baquero-Artigao MR, Mena-Álvarez J. An analysis in vivo of intracanal bacterial load before and after chemo-mechanical preparation: A comparative analysis of two irrigants and two activation techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):e9-13.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.52585

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52585

 

References

1. Huffaker SK, Safavi K, Spangberg L, Kaufman B. Influence of a passive sonic irrigation system on the elimination of bacteria from root canal systems: a clinical study. J End. 2010;36:1315-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.024
PMid:20647087

 

2. Brito P, Souza L, Machado de Oliveira JC, Alves F, De-Deus G, Lopes HP, et al. Comparison of the effectiviness of three irrigation techniques in reducing intracanal Enterococcus faecalis populations: an in vitro study. J End. 2009;35:1422-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.001
PMid:19801244

 

3. Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P. Effectiviness of different final irrigant activation on smear layer removal in curved canals. J End. 2010;836:1361-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037
PMid:20647097

 

4. Pasqualini D, Cuffini AM, Scotti N, Mandras N, Scalas D, Pera F, et al. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of a 5% sodium hypochlorite subsonic-activates solution. J End. 2010;36:1358-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.035
PMid:20647096

 

5. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of varius intracanal irrigation systems. J End. 2009;35:545-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.011
PMid:19345802

 

6. Rasimick BJ, Shah RP, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Bacterial colonisation of root canal dentine previously treated with endodontic irrigants. Aust Endod J. 2010;36:70-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00193.x
PMid:20666752

 

7. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Paiva S, Guimaraes T, Magalhaes KM, Lima KC. Bacteriologic investigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and clorhexidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:122-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.027
PMid:17499528

 

8. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BPFA, Conrads G. In vivo evaluation of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int Endod J. 2006;39:484-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01121.x
PMid:16674744

 

9. Ferraz C, Gomes B, Zaia A, Teixeira F, Souza-Filho FJ. Comparative Study of the antimicrobial efficacy of clorhexidine gel, clorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent Journal. 2007;18:294-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000400004

PMid:18278298

 

10. Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjäderhane L, Grad H, Gorduysus O, Huang J, et al. Sustantive antimicrobial activity in clorhexidine-treated human root dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:240-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.124002
PMid:12221393

 

11. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath P. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hipochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separatly and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J End. 1998;24:472-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6

PMid:9693573

 

12. Malkahassian G, Manzur AJ, Legner M, Fillery ED, Manek S, Basrani BR, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of MTAD final rinse and two percent clorhexidina gel medication in teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. J End. 2009;35:1483-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.003
PMid:19840635

 

13. Roças IN, Siqueira Jr JF. Comparison of the in vivo antimicrobial effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine used as root canal irrigants: a molecular microbiology study. J End. 2011;37:143-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.006
PMid:21238793

 

14. Davis JM, Maki J, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of the antimicrobial effects of various endodontic medicament on Enteroccus faecalis. J End. 2007;33:567-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.015
PMid:17437873

 

15. Vianna ME, Gomes B, Bellocchio Berber V, Zaia AA, Randi Ferraz CC, de Souza-Filho. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:79-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00360-3

PMid:14716261

 

16. Oliveira DP, Barbizam J, Trope M, Teixeira FB, Hill C. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enteroccus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:702-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007
PMid:17368057

 

17. Vianna ME, Gomes BP. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite combined with chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:585-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.023
PMid:19157916

 

18. Zou L, Shen Y, Li W, Haapasalo M. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentin. J End. 2010;36:793-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.005
PMid:20416421

 

19. Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadrada K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working lenght of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J End. 2012;38:445-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007
PMid:22414827

 

20. De Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Paranjpe A, Cohenca N. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length: an in vitro study. J End. 2010;36:1216-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.019
PMid:20630302

 

21. Adcock JM, Sidow SJ, Looney SW, Liu Y, McNally K, Lindsey K, et al. Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system. J End. 2011;37:544-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006
PMid:21419306

 

22. Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Langedijk J, Wesselink P, van der Sluis LW. The influence of the ultrasonic intensity on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J End. 2011; 37:688-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.004
PMid:21496672

 

23. Malentacca A, Uccioli U, Zangari D, Lajolo C, Fabiani C. Efficacy and safety of various active irrigation devices when used with either positive or negative pressure: an in vitro study. J End. 2012;38:1622-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.009
PMid:23146649

 

24. Jiang LM, Lak B, Eijsvogels LM, Wesselinl P, Van der Sluis L. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of different final irrigation techiques. J End. 2012;38:838-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.002
PMid:22595122

 

25. Shen Y, Stojicic S, Qian W, Olsen I, Haapasalo M. The synergistic antimicrobial effect by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilms bacteria. J End. 2010;36:100-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.018
PMid:20003944

 

26. Al-Jadaa A, Paquè F, Attin T, Zehnder M. Acoustic hypochlorite activation in simulated curved Canals. J End. 2009;35:1408-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.007
PMid:19801241

 

27. Paragliola R, Franco V, Fabiani C, Mazzoni A, Nato F, Tay FR, et al. Final rinse optimization: influence of different agitation protocols. J End. 2010;36:282-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.004
PMid:20113791

 

28. Towsend C, Maki J. An in vitro comparison of new irrigation and agitation techniques to ultrasonic agitation in removing bacteria from a simulated root canal. J End. 2009;35:1040-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.007
PMid:19567330