Firouzmandi M, Doozandeh M, Jowkar Z, Abbasi S. Effect of composite/amalgam thickness on fracture resistance of maxillary premolar teeth, restored with combined amalgam-composite restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(3):e268-72.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.52726

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52726

 

References

1. Kaur G, Singh M, Bal C, Singh U. Comparative evaluation of combined amalgam and composite resin restorations in extensively carious vital posterior teeth: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:46-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.80742
PMid:21691506 PMCid:PMC3099114

 

2. Dias de Souza GM, Pereira GD, Dias CT, Paulillo LA. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Oper Dent. 2001;26:511-5.
PMid:11551017

 

3. Daneshkazemi AR. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5:51-8.
PMid:15318256

 

4. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am J Dent. 2002;15:389-94.
PMid:12691276

 

5. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:30-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60006-2

PMid:18182183

 

6. Mondelli J, Sene F, Ramos RP, Benetti AR. Tooth structure and fracture strength of cavities. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:134-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000200009
PMid:17982553

 

7. Lenzi TL, Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O. Degradation of resin-dentin bonds of etch-and-rinse adhesive system to primary and permanent teeth. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:511-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012005000023
PMid:23019083

 

8. Geiger S, Paikin L, Gorfil C, Gordon M. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:e58-62.
PMid:18560642

 

9. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
PMid:21112620 PMCid:PMC3857593

 

10. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26:e24-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149
PMid:20005565

 

11. Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, de Souza Costa CA, Pashley DH, Hebling J. Chlorhexidine increases the longevity of in vivo resin-dentin bonds. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:411-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00754.x
PMid:20662916

 

12. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture resistance of premolars restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:973641.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/973641
PMid:22666255 PMCid:PMC3359818

 

13. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:775-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
PMid:17545266

 

14. Kournetas N, Kakaboura A, Giftopoulos D, Chakmachi M, Rahiotis C, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Marginal behaviour of self-etch adhesive/composite and combined amalgam-composite restorations. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;18:70-7.
PMid:20698421

 

15. Abu-Hanna AA, Mjör IA. Combined amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29:342-4.
PMid:15195736

 

16. Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P. Microleakage in combined amalgam-composite resin restorations in MOD cavities. Braz J Oral Sci.2013;12:100-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-32252013000200006

 

17. Hamouda IM, Shehata SH. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials. J Biomed Res. 2011;25:418-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60055-9

PMid:23554719

 

18. Cehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments. Oper Dent. 2010;35:337-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/09-135-L
PMid:20533635

 

19. Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:37-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100008
PMid:20379680

 

20. Shafiei F, Memarpour M, Karimi F. Fracture resistance of cuspal coverage of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with combined composite-amalgam compared to other techniques. Oper Dent. 2011;36:439-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-029-L
PMid:21819198

 

21. Bousdras VA, Cunningham JL, Ferguson-Pell M, Bamber MA, Sindet-Pedersen S, Blunn G, Goodship AE. A novel approach to bite force measurements in a porcine model in vivo. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:663-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.01.023
PMid:16540289