Gungor OE, Erdogan Y, Gungor AY, Alkis H. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(3):e322-6.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.52785

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.52785

 

References

1. Ilie N, Schoner C, Bucher K, Hickel R. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent. 2014;42:850-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.013
PMid:24704081

 

2. Chaitra TR, Subba Reddy VV, Devarasa GM, Ravishankar TL. Flowable resin used as a sealant in molars using conventional, enameloplasty and fissurotomy techniques: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:145-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.73786
PMid:21157044

 

3. Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, Elangovan A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32:304-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.140952
PMid:25231038

 

4. Hammouda IM, Al-Wakeel EE. Effect of water storage on fluoride release and mechanical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer). J Biomed Res. 2011;25:254-8.
PMid:23554698 PMCid:PMC3597066

 

5. Pacifici E, Chazine M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Shear-bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable restorative material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38:149-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.38.2.l3q5l3128k2870j7
PMid:24683779

 

6. Nujella BP, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:22-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.94541
PMid:22557892 PMCid:PMC3341754

 

7. Oberholzer TG, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Kotze TJ. The effect of an additional flowable compomer layer on microleakage of Class V compomer restorations. SADJ. 2003;58:48-53.
PMid:12800263

 

8. Yazici AR, Muftu A, Kugel G. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:9-17.
PMid:17618325

 

9. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
PMid:13271655

 

10. Bansal S, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N. Technique-sensitivity of dentin-bonding agent application: the effect on shear bond strength using one-step self-etch adhesive in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:183-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.73781
PMid:21157051

 

11. Dhillon JK, Pathak A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or self-etching primer. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:288-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.108922
PMid:23514679

 

12. Deshmukh S, Nandlal B. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of nanocomposite on carious and sound deciduous dentin. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5:25-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1129
PMid:25206130 PMCid:PMC4093639

 

13. Peutzfeldt A, Nielsen LA. Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel: phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:240-4.
PMid:15185805

 

14. Pushpalatha HM, Ravichandra KS, Srikanth K, Divya G, Done V, Krishna KB, et al. Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strength of different Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanent teeth - An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:84-9.
PMid:24876707 PMCid:PMC4037800

 

15. Maher MM, Elkashlan HI, El-Housseiny AA. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35:351-4.
PMid:23930635

 

16. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res. 2012;91:351-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251
PMid:22173327

 

17. Gungor AY, Alkis H, Turkkahraman H. Effects of contamination by either blood or a hemostatic agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic buttons. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:96-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.96
PMid:23671834 PMCid:PMC3650218

 

18. Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent. 2006;31:569-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/05-102
PMid:17024945

 

19. Tuloglu N, Sen Tunc E, Ozer S, Bayrak S. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite on dentin with and without application of an adhesive system. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014;12:97-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000166

PMid:24127036

 

20. Yaseen SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:33-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.50814
PMid:19414972

 

21. Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of all-in-one self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:9-16.
PMid:16685290

 

22. Croll TP. MagicFil: a colorful kiddie compomer. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23:1044-6,8.

PMid:12526192

 

23. Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19:148-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000273077
PMid:20134179