Gungor OE, Erdogan
Y, Gungor AY, Alkis H. Comparative
evaluation of shear bond strength of three flowable compomers on enamel of primary teeth: An in-vitro
study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(3):e322-6.
doi:10.4317/jced.52785
References
1. Ilie
N, Schoner C, Bucher K, Hickel
R. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin
composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent.
2014;42:850-5. |
|
|
|
2.
Chaitra TR, Subba Reddy VV, Devarasa GM, Ravishankar TL. Flowable resin used as a sealant in molars using conventional, enameloplasty and fissurotomy
techniques: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:145-50. |
|
|
|
3. Raju
VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara
J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran
S, Elangovan A. Comparative evaluation of shear
bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer
restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J
Indian Soc Pedod Prev
Dent. 2014;32:304-10. |
|
|
|
4.
Hammouda IM, Al-Wakeel
EE. Effect of water storage on fluoride release and
mechanical properties of a polyacid-modified
composite resin (compomer). J Biomed Res. 2011;25:254-8. |
|
|
|
5. Pacifici
E, Chazine M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari
M. Shear-bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable
restorative material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin
Pediatr Dent. 2013;38:149-54. |
|
|
|
6. Nujella
BP, Choudary MT, Reddy SP, Kumar MK, Gopal T. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic
restorative materials. Contemp Clin
Dent. 2012;3:22-6. |
|
|
|
7. Oberholzer
TG, Grobler SR, Rossouw
RJ, Kotze TJ. The effect of an additional flowable compomer layer on microleakage of Class V compomer
restorations. SADJ.
2003;58:48-53. |
|
|
|
8. Yazici
AR, Muftu A, Kugel G.
Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing
protocols. J
Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:9-17. |
|
|
|
9. Buonocore
MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials
to enamel surfaces. J
Dent Res. 1955;34:849-53. |
|
|
|
10. Bansal
S, Pandit IK, Srivastava
N, Gugnani N. Technique-sensitivity of
dentin-bonding agent application: the effect on shear bond strength using
one-step self-etch adhesive in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Indian
Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:183-8. |
|
|
|
11. Dhillon
JK, Pathak A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond
strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or
self-etching primer. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:288-92. |
|
|
|
12. Deshmukh
S, Nandlal B. Evaluation of the shear bond strength
of nanocomposite on carious and sound deciduous
dentin. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5:25-8. |
|
|
|
13. Peutzfeldt
A, Nielsen LA. Bond strength of a sealant to primary and permanent enamel:
phosphoric acid versus self-etching adhesive. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:240-4. |
|
|
|
14.
Pushpalatha HM, Ravichandra
KS, Srikanth K, Divya G,
Done V, Krishna KB, et al. Comparative
evaluation of Shear bond strength of different Pit and fissure Sealants in
Primary and Permanent teeth - An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:84-9. |
|
|
|
15. Maher MM, Elkashlan HI, El-Housseiny AA.
Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary
teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35:351-4. |
|
|
|
16.
De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin
A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin
bonding. J Dent Res. 2012;91:351-7. |
|
|
|
17. Gungor
AY, Alkis H, Turkkahraman
H. Effects of contamination by either blood or a hemostatic
agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic buttons. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:96-100. |
|
|
|
18. Uekusa
S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding
efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent
tooth dentin. Oper Dent. 2006;31:569-76. |
|
|
|
19. Tuloglu
N, Sen Tunc E, Ozer S, Bayrak S. Shear bond
strength of self-adhering flowable composite on
dentin with and without application of an adhesive system. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014;12:97-101. PMid:24127036 |
|
|
|
20. Yaseen
SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear
bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on
dentin of primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:33-8. |
|
|
|
21. Al-Sarheed
MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and SEM observation of all-in-one
self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7:9-16. |
|
|
|
22. Croll
TP. MagicFil: a colorful kiddie
compomer. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23:1044-6,8. PMid:12526192 |
|
|
|
23. Ertugrul
F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a
12-month clinical study. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19:148-52. |