|
1. Rees J, Addy M. A
cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in
UK general dental practice and a summary review of
prevalence studies. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004; 2: 64-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5029.2004.00068.x
PMid:16451464
|
|
|
|
2. Dababneh RH, Khouri AT,
Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review
of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management.
Br Dent J. 1999; 187: 606-11.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800345a
|
|
|
|
|
3. American Academy of
Operative D. Non-carious cervical lesions. Recommendations
for clinical practice. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 109-13.
PMid:12670064
|
|
|
|
|
4. Brännström M, Linden L,
Åström A. The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and of
pulp fluid. Caries Res.
1967; 1: 310-7.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000259530
PMid:5241870
|
|
|
|
|
5. Camilotti V,
Zilly J, Busato Pdo M, Nassar CA, Nassar PO. Desensitizing treatments for
dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, split-mouth
clinical trial. Braz Oral Res.
2012; 26: 263-8.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300013
PMid:22641447
|
|
|
|
|
6. Gillam D, Mordan N,
Sinodinou A, Tang J, Knowles J, Gibson I. The effects
of oxalate-containing products on the exposed dentine
surface: an SEM investigation. J
Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 1037-44.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00775.x
PMid:11722720
|
|
|
|
|
7. Morris M, Davis R, Richardson
B. Clinical efficacy of two dentin desensitizing
agents. Am J Dent. 1999; 12: 72-6.
PMid:10477986
|
|
|
|
|
8. Shafiei F, Memarpour M,
Doozandeh M. Effect of oxalate desensitizer on the
bonding durability of adhesive resin cements to dentin.
J
Prosthodont Res. 2012; 56: 187-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2011.11.003
PMid:22264675
|
|
|
|
|
9. Pashley D, Carvalho R,
Pereira J, Villanueva R, Tay F. The use of oxalate to
reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations.
Am
J Dent. 2001; 14: 89-94.
PMid:11507806
|
|
|
|
|
10. Cunha-Cruz J, Stout J,
Heaton L, Wataha J. Dentin hypersensitivity and
oxalates a systematic review. J
Dent Res. 2011; 90: 304-10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510389179
PMid:21191127 PMCid:PMC3144108
|
|
|
|
|
11. Coutinho E,
Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Fukuda R, Snauwaert J, Nakayama Y,
et al. Gel phase formation at resin-modified
glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J
Dent Res. 2007; 86: 656-61.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600714
PMid:17586714
|
|
|
|
|
12. Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I.
Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and
giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009;
6: 75-81.
|
|
|
|
|
13. McComb D, Erickson RL,
Maxymiw WG, Wood RE. A clinical comparison of glass
ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin
composite restorations in the treatment of cervical
caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper
Dent. 2002; 27: 430-7.
PMid:12216559
|
|
|
|
|
14. Heintze SD, Roulet JF.
Glass ionomer derivates have better retention rates in
cervical restorations compared to self-etching adhesive
systems. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010; 10: 18-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.012
PMid:20230958
|
|
|
|
|
15. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA.
Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in
Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence
Int. 1997; 28: 255-8.
PMid:10332375
|
|
|
|
|
16. Yiu C, King N, Suh B,
Sharp L, Carvalho R, Pashley D, et al. Incompatibility
of oxalate desensitizers with acidic,
fluoride-containing total-etch adhesives. J
Dent Res. 2005; 84: 730-5.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400809
PMid:16040731
|
|
|
|
|
17. De Andrade e
Silva SM, Malacarne-Zanon J, Carvalho RM, Alves MC, De
Goes MF, Anido-Anido A, et al. Effect of oxalate desensitizer
on the durability of resin-bonded interfaces. Oper
Dent. 2010; 35: 610-7.
https://doi.org/10.2341/09-202-L
PMid:21179999
|
|
|
|
|
18. Cobanoglu N,
Unlu N, Ozer FF, Blatz MB. Bond strength of self-etch
adhesives after saliva contamination at different
application steps. Oper Dent. 2013;
38: 505-11.
https://doi.org/10.2341/12-260-L
PMid:23327232
|
|
|
|
|
19. Poggio C, Beltrami R,
Scribante A, Colombo M, Lombardini M. Effects of dentin
surface treatments on shear bond strength of
glass-ionomer cements. Ann
Stomatol (Roma). 2014; 5: 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2014.5.1.015
|
|
|
|
|
20. Hewlett ER, Caputo AA,
Wrobele DC. Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment
of dentin with polyacrylic acid. J
Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66: 767-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90412-P
|
|
|
|
|
21. Pereira P, Yamada T, Tei
R, Tagami J. Bond strength and interface
micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass
ionomer cement. Am J Dent. 1997;
10: 128-32.
PMid:9545887
|
|
|
|
|
22. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF.
Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer
adhesive system: results at five years. Oper
Dent. 2002; 27: 438-41.
PMid:12216560
|
|
|
|
|
23. Buchalla W, Attin T,
Hellwig E. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond
strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials
and polyacid-modified composite resins. J
Clin Dent. 1995; 7: 81-4.
|
|
|
|
|
24. Inoue S, Abe
Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Suzuki K, et al. Effect of conditioner on bond
strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel
with and without smear layer interposition. Oper
Dent. 2004; 29: 685-92.
PMid:15646225
|
|
|
|
|
25. Tay F, Pashley D, Mak Y,
Carvalho R, Lai S, Suh B. Integrating oxalate
desensitizers with total-etch two-step adhesive. J
Dent Res. 2003; 82: 703-7.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200909
PMid:12939354
|
|
|
|
|
26. Lin A, McIntyre N,
Davidson R. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer
cements to dentin. J Dent Res.
1992; 71: 1836-41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710111401
PMid:1401448
|
|
|
|
|
27. Scheffel D, Tenuta L, Cury
JA, Hebling J. Effect of acid etching time on
demineralization of primary and permanent coronal
dentin. Am J Dent. 2012; 25: 235-8.
PMid:23082389
|
|
|
|
|
28. Pashley D, Galloway S. The
effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of
ground surfaces of human dentine. Arch
Oral Biol. 1985; 30: 731-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(85)90185-2
|
|
|
|
|
29. Yiu CK, Hiraishi N,
Chersoni S, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Prati C, et al.
Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes
after polymerisation. II. Differential permeability
reduction with an oxalate desensitiser. J
Dent. 2006; 34: 106-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.05.001
PMid:15979228
|
|
|
|
|
30. Paes LA, Dos Santos J,
Giannini M, Wada R. Occlusion of dentin tubules by
desensitizing agents. Am J Dent.
2004; 17: 368-72.
|
|