|
1. Siqueira JF Jr,
Araújo MC, Garcia
PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the
effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for
cleaning the apical third of root canals. J
Endod. 1997;23:499-502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80309-3
PMid:9587319
|
|
|
|
2. Wu MK, Dummer PM, Wesselink PR. Consequences of and
strategies to deal with residual post-treatment root
canal infection. Int Endod J. 2006;39:343-56.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01092.x
PMid:16640632
|
|
|
|
|
3. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in
the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J
Endod. 2004;30:559-67.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636
|
|
|
|
|
4. Taha NA, Ozawa T,
Messer HH. Comparison of three techniques for preparing
oval-shaped root canals. J Endod. 2010;36:532-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.015
PMid:20171378
|
|
|
|
|
5. Jou YT, Karabucak B, Levin J, Liu D.
Endodontic working width: current concepts and
techniques. Dent Clin North Am.
2004;48:323-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.006
PMid:15066519
|
|
|
|
|
6. De-Deus G,
Souza EM, Barino B, Maia J, Zamolyi
RQ, Reis C, et al. The self-adjusting file
optimizes debridement quality in oval-shaped root canals.
J
Endod. 2011;37:701-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.001
PMid:21496675
|
|
|
|
|
7. Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, Gavini
G, Machado ME, Santos M. A micro-computed tomography
evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using
reciprocating or rotary systems. Int
Endod J. 2015;48:1001-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12398
PMid:25314154
|
|
|
|
|
8. Ruckman JE, Whitten
B, Sedgley CM, Svec T. Comparison of the
self-adjusting file with rotary and hand instrumentation
in long-oval-shaped root canals. J
Endod. 2013;39:92-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.002
PMid:23228264
|
|
|
|
|
9. Williamson AE, Sandor
AJ, Justman BC. A comparison of
three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence,
ProTaper universal, and profile
GT, for canal-cleaning ability. J
Endod. 2009;35:107-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.022
PMid:19084136
|
|
|
|
|
10. Hilaly Eid GE, Wanees
Amin SA. Changes in diameter,
cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching
on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval
canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod. 2011;112:688-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.007
PMid:21862367
|
|
|
|
|
11. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink
PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques
to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int
Endod J. 2003;36:218-24.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00646.x
PMid:12657148
|
|
|
|
|
12. Grande NM, Plotino
G, Butti A, Messina F, Pameijer CH, Somma
F. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless
steel reciprocating files. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.
2007;103:120-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.022
PMid:17178505
|
|
|
|
|
13. De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi
RQ, Souza E, Fonseca A Jr,
Fidel S, et al. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the
single-file F2 ProTaper
technique in oval-shaped canals. J
Endod. 2010;36:1897-900.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.009
PMid:20951309
|
|
|
|
|
14. Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin
T, Peters OA. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using
nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A micro-computed
tomography study. J Endod. 2010;36:703-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.020
PMid:20307747
|
|
|
|
|
15. Clauder T, Baumann
MA. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:87-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.10.006
PMid:15066509
|
|
|
|
|
16. Weiger R, ElAyouti A, Löst
C. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping
oval root canals. J Endod. 2002 ;28:580-3.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200208000-00004
PMid:12184418
|
|