Rodriguez y Baena R, Beltrami R, Tagliabo A, Rizzo S, Lupi SM. Differences between panoramic and Cone Beam-CT in the surgical evaluation of lower third molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(2):e259-65.

doi:10.4317/jced.53234

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53234

References

1. Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. American journal of public health. 2007;97:1554-9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.100271 PMid:17666691 PMCid:PMC1963310

2. Tay AB, Zuniga JR. Clinical characteristics of trigeminal nerve injury referrals to a university centre. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2007;36:922-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.012 PMid:17875382

3. Venta I, Lindqvist C, Ylipaavalniemi P. Malpractice claims for permanent nerve injuries related to third molar removals. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 1998;56:193-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016359850142772 PMid:9765008

4. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:33-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(95)90083-7 PMid:7718526

5. Rizzo S, Lupi SM, Zampetti P. Nerve damage resulting from oral surgery and medical legal implications. Journal of Osseointegration. 2009;1:86-94.

6. Robert RC, Bacchetti P, Pogrel MA. Frequency of trigeminal nerve injuries following third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:732-5;discussion 736. PMid: 15944965.

7. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:325. PMid:17484797

8. Tay AB, Go WS. Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:592-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.033 PMid: 15122566

9. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007;19:117-28,vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013 PMid:18088870

10. Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2010;109:276-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.021 PMid:20123411

11. Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, Tennant M. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Australian dental journal. 2006;51:64-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00403.x PMid:16669480

12. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Berge SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2009;38:964-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.007 PMid:19640685

13. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. International endodontic journal. 2009;42:447-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01530.x PMid:19298577

14. Kamrun N, Tetsumura A, Nomura Y, Yamaguchi S, Baba O, Nakamura S, et al. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2013;115:550-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.01.001 PMid:23522648

15. Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933;39:330-8.

16. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2007;65:1303-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.028 PMid:17577493

17. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(90)90005-6 PMid: 2322523

18. Rud J. Third molar surgery: perforation of the inferior dental nerve through the root. Tandlaegebladet. 1983;87:659-67. PMid:6585011

19. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1980;100:185-92. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0074 PMid:6928147

20. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.060 PMid:17234544

21. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2006;64:1030-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.020 PMid:16781335

22. Ohman A, Kivijarvi K, Blomback U, Flygare L. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:30-5. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/58068337 PMid:16421261

23. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2004;135:312-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0179 PMid:15058618

24. Maegawa H, Sano K, Kitagawa Y, Ogasawara T, Miyauchi K, Sekine J, et al. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:639-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00356-1 PMid:14600702

25. Miller CS, Nummikoski PV, Barnett DA, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional tomography. A diagnostic technique for determining the buccolingual relationship of impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70:791-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90023-L PMid:2263343

26. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. European journal of radiology. 2012;81:267-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028 PMid:21196094

27. Evidence based guidelines on cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. In: Commission E (ed). Radiation protection no 172. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2012.

28. Matzen LH, Christensen J, Hintze H, Schou S, Wenzel A. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:98870341. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/98870341 PMid:22933533 PMCid:PMC5083118
29. Guerrero ME, Botetano R, Beltran J, Horner K, Jacobs R. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT. Clinical oral investigations. 2014;18:335-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0971-x PMid:23494455