González-Serrano C, Baena E, Fuentes MV, Albaladejo A, Míguez-Contreras M, Lagravère MO, Ceballos L. Shear bond strength of a flash-free orthodontic adhesive system after thermal aging procedure. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(8):e679-679.

doi:10.4317/jced.532744

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References

1. Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, Garcia-Godoy F, Park MG, Kim HI, et al. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:730-4. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.730 PMid:20019425

2. Grünheid T, Sudit GN, Larson BE. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:497-502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju080 PMid:25548144

3. Öztürk F, Ersöz M, Öztürk SA, Hatunoğlu E, Malkoç S. Micro-CT Evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:163-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv023 PMid:25855655 PMCid:PMC4914757

4. Msallam FA, Grawish ME, Hafez AM, Abdelnaby YL. Decalcification prevention around orthodontic brackets bonded to bleached enamel using different topical agents. Prog Orthod. 2017;18:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0170-4 PMid:28580541 PMCid:PMC5466901

5. Foersch M, Schuster C, Rahimi RK, Wehrbein H, Jacobs C. A new flash-free orthodontic adhesive system: A first clinical and stereomicroscopic study. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:260-4. https://doi.org/10.2319/050415-302.1 PMid:26258897

6. Lee M, Kanavakis G. Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:265-70. https://doi.org/10.2319/011715-37.1 PMid:25970652

7. Kim J, Kanavakis G, Finkelman, MD, Lee M. Microleakage under ceramic flash-free orthodontic brackets after thermal cycling. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:905-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/021016-115.1 PMid:27182779

8. Ansari MY, Agarwal DK, Gupta A, Bhattacharya P, Ansar J, Bhandari R. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs: Comparative in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:64-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/20624.8910

9. Marc MG, Bazert C, Attal JP. Bond strength of pre-coated flash-free adhesive ceramic brackets. An in vitro comparative study on the second mandibular premolars. Int Orthod. 2018;16:425-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.017

10. Grünheid T, Larson BE. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep 19. Epub.

11. Grünheid T, Larson BE. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154:621-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.012 PMid:30384932

12. Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior JF, Conti ACCF. The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0209-1 PMid:29713922 PMCid:PMC5928014

13. Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T, Isci D, Ozkalayci N. Thermocycling effects on shear bond strength of a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:351-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/122906-537.1 PMid:18251621

14. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2

15. Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) approach. Dent Mater. 2017;33:133–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015 PMid:28007396

16. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8

17. Goswami A, Mitali B, Roy, B. Shear bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primer and self-etching primer. J Orthod Sci. 2014;3:89-93. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.137695 PMid:25143933 PMCid:PMC4138792

18. Vicente A, Bravo LA. Shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets using a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:524-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0524:SBSOPA]2.0.CO;2

19. Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo Cet al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013 PMid:24135128

20. Sokucu O, Siso SH, Ozturk F, Nalcaci R. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cured with different light sources under thermocycling. Eur J Dent. 2010;4:257-62. PMid:20613913 PMCid:PMC2897858

21. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Cakmak F, Ozkalayci N. Shear bond strength of a self-etching primer after 10,000 and 20,000 thermal cycles. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:117-22. PMid:20157670

22. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666

23. Mohammadi E, Pishevar L, Mirzakouchaki Boroujeni P. Effect of food simulating liquids on the flexural strength of a methacrylate and silorane-based composite. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017;12:e0188829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188829 PMid:29232691 PMCid:PMC5726734

24. Katona TR. Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:39-46. PMid:9046398

25. Montasser MA, Drummond JL. Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:773-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/080108-398.1 PMid:19537872