Kalra P, Rao A, Suman E, Shenoy  R, Suprabha BS. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An in vitro randomized trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(2):e254-8.

 

 

doi:10.4317/jced.53340

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53340

 

References

1. Logani A, Shah N. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: An ex vivo comparative study. J Dent Res. 2008;19:182-5.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.42947

PMid:18797091

 

2. De-Deus G, Brandao MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:390-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.04.020
PMid:20727500

 

3. Kuştarci A, Akpinar KE, Sümer Z, Er K, Bek B. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2008;41:1066-71.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01470.x
PMid:19133095

 

4. Vande Visse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. Journal of Endod. 1975;1:243-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80227-5

PMid:1061800

 

5. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral MedOral Pathol. 1982;54:323-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90103-7

PMid:6957828

 

6. Fairbourn DR, McWalter GM, Montgomery S. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. Journal Endod. 1987;13:102-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80174-7

PMid:3471831

 

7. Pasqualini D, Scotti N, Tamagnone L, Ellena F, Berutti E. Hand-operated and rotary ProTaper instruments: a comparison of working time and number of rotations in simulated root canals. J Endod. 2008;34:314-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.017
PMid:18291284

 

8. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris Extruded apically by conventional filing and canal master techniques. Endod. 1991;17:275-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81866-2

PMid:1940753

 

9. Taneja S, Kumari M, Barua M, Dudeja C, Malik M. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26:67-71.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.156813
PMid:25961619

 

10. Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayir Gl. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:252-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.002
PMid:16448929

 

11. Tanalp J, Gungor T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014;47:211-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12137
PMid:23711187

 

12. Portenier I, Waltimo TMT, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis – the root canal survivor and 'star' in post-treatment disease. Endodontic Topics. 2003;1:135-59.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00040.x

 

13. Dahlen G, Haapasalo M. Microbiology of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, eds. Essential Endodontology: Prevention and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis, 1st Edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.1988; pp:106-25.

 

14. Martin H, Cunningham WT. The effect of endosonic and hand: Manipulation on the amount of root canal material extruded. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53:611-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90350-4

PMid:6954443

 

15. Beeson T, Hartwell G, Thornton J, Gunsoiley J. Comparison of debris extruded apicaliy in straight canals: Conventional fi ling versus Profile. 04 Taper series 29. J Endod. 1998;24:18-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80206-9

PMid: 9487860

 

16. Shalan LA, Al-Hashimi WN, Al-Mizraqchi AS. Comparitive study of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using different instruments and techniques (In vitro study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2009;21:23-7.

 

17. Shovelton DS. The presence and distribution of microorganisms within non-vital teeth. British Dental Journal. 1964:117;101-7.

 

18. Goerig AC, Michelich RJ, Schultz HH. Instrumentation of root canals in molars using the step-down technique. J Endod. 1982;8:550-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80015-0

PMid:6962274

 

19. Madhusudhana K, Mathew VB, Reddy NM. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010;1:234-6.
PMid:22114427 PMCid:PMC3220143

 

20. Azar NG, Ebrahimi G. Apically extruded debris using the ProTaper system. Aust Endod J. 2005;31:21-3.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00202.x

PMid:15881729

 

21. Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003;36:453-63.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00671.x

PMid:12823700

 

22. Ruiz-Hubbard EE, Gutmann JL, Wagner MJ. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques. J Endod. 1987;13:554-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80004-3

PMid: 3482231

 

23. Naidorf IJ. Endodontic flare-ups: bacteriological and immunological mechanisms. J Endod. 1985;11:462-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80218-1

PMid: 3868690

 

24. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: part I—etiological factors. J Endod- 2004;30:476-81.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200407000-00005
PMid:15220641

 

25. Van de Visse J, Brilliant JD. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endod. 1975;1:243-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80227-5

PMid: 1061800