|
1. Schilder H.
Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent clin North Am. 1974;18:269-96.
PMid:4522570
|
|
|
|
2. Weine FS, Kelly RF,
Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and
on apical foramen shape. J endod. 1975;1:255-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
PMid:10697472
|
|
|
|
|
3. Walia HM, Brantley
WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional
properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14:346-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
PMid:3251996
|
|
|
|
|
4. Peters OA. Current
challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a
review. J
endod. 2004;30:559-67.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
PMid:15273636
|
|
|
|
|
5. Shen Y, Zhou HM,
Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the
thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J endod.
2013;39:163-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005
PMid:23321225
|
|
|
|
|
6. Aminsobhani M,
Meraji N, Sadri E. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Five Nickel
Titanium Rotary File Systems with Different Manufacturing Techniques. J Dent
(Tehran). 2015;12:636-46.
PMid:27148374
PMCid:PMC4854742
|
|
|
|
|
7. Moazzami F,
Khojastepour L, Nabavizadeh M, Seied Habashi M. Cone-Beam Computed
Tomography Assessment of Root Canal Transportation by Neoniti and
Reciproc Single-File Systems. Iran Endod E. 2016;11:96-100.
PMid:27141215 PMCid:PMC4841342
|
|
|
|
|
8. Burklein S,
Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Shaping ability and cleaning
effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals
of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod E.
2012;45:449-61.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01996.x
PMid:22188401
|
|
|
|
|
9. Pirani C, Ruggeri
O, Cirulli PP, Pelliccioni GA, Gandolfi MG, Prati C. Metallurgical
analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium
instruments. Odontology.
2014;102:211-6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0113-6
PMid:23568014
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary
systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod.
2014;40:852-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010
PMid:24862716
|
|
|
|
|
11. Hiran-Us S,
Pimkhaokham S, Sawasdichai J, Ebihara A, Suda H. Shaping ability of
ProTaper NEXT, ProTaper Universal and iRace files in simulated S-shaped
canals. Aust
Endod J. 2016;42:32-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12117
PMid:26420685
|
|
|
|
|
12. Schneider SW. A
comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
PMid:5284110
|
|
|
|
|
13. Lim KC, Webber J.
The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the
prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J. 1985;18:240-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00450.x
PMid:3865899
|
|
|
|
|
14. Berutti E,
Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al.
Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper
system: a comparative study. J Endod. 2012;38:505-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.040
PMid:22414838
|
|
|
|
|
15. Hoppe CB, Bottcher
DE, Justo AM, So MV, Grecca FS. Comparison of curved root canals
preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions.
Scanning. 2016;38:462-8.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21297
PMid:26750106
|
|
|
|
|
16. Bryant ST, Dummer
PM, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper
ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod
J. 1999;32:155-64.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00256.x
PMid:10530202
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Zhang L, Luo HX, Zhou XD, Tan H, Huang DM. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium
instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2008;34:456-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.007
PMid:18358896
|
|
|
|
|
18. Wu MK, Fan B,
Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals.
Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod.
2000;26:210-6.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
PMid:11199720
|
|
|
|
|
19. Guelzow A, Stamm
O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary
nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal
preparation. Int
Endod J. 2005;38:743-52.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01010.x
PMid:16164689
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Camara AS, de Castro Martins R, Viana AC, de Toledo Leonardo R, Buono VT,
de Azevedo Bahia MG. Flexibility
and torsional strength of ProTaper and ProTaper Universal rotary
instruments assessed by mechanical tests. J Endod. 2009;35:113-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.006
PMid:19084138
|
|
|
|
|
21. Gergi R,
Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, Naaman A. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation
of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary
nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1223-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.039
PMid:25069937
|
|
|
|
|
22. Kum KY, Spangberg
L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, Seung-Jong L, et al. Shaping ability of three
ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals.
J Endod. 2000;26:719-23.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
PMid:11471641
|
|
|
|
|
23. Turpin YL,
Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on
torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument
models. J
Endod. 2000;26:414-7.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200007000-00009
PMid:11199768
|
|
|
|
|
24. Schafer E, Dzepina
A, Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral radiol endod. 2003;96:757-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00358-5
PMid:14676769
|
|