Sharafeddin F, Ghaboos SA,
Jowkar Z. The effect of short polyethylene fiber with different weight percentages on diametral tensile
strength of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Clin Exp
Dent. 2017;9(3):e466-70.
doi:10.4317/jced.53550
References
1.
Paschoal MA, Gurgel CV, Rios D, Magalhães AC, Buzalaf MA, Machado MA. Fluoride release profile of a nanofilled
resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:275-9 |
|
|
|
2. Hammouda IM.
Reinforcement of conventional glass-ionomer restorative material with short
glass fibers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2:73-81. |
|
|
|
3.
Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR, Coutinho M, Francisconi PA. Glass ionomer cements and their role in the
restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:364-9. |
|
|
|
4. Sharafeddin F, Chobineh
MM. Assessment of the shearbond strength between nanofilled composite bonded
to glass ionomer cement using self- etch adhesive with different plts and to
tal Etch adhesive. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17:1-6. PMid:26966701PMCid:PMC4771046 |
|
|
|
5. Sharafeddin F, Moradian
M, Motamedi M. Evaluation of shear bond strength of methacrglate and siloran-
based composite resin bonded to resin modified glass – ionomer containing
micro – and Nano-hydroxy apatite. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17:142-8. |
|
|
|
6. Moshaverinia A, Ansari
S, Movasaghi Z, Billington RW, Darr JA, Rehman IU. Modification of
conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing
polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties. Dent
Mater. 2008;24:1381-90. |
|
|
|
7. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LV,
Narhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of
glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater J.
2005;21:201-9. |
|
|
|
8. Goenka S1, Balu R,
Sampath Kumar TS. Effects of nanocrystalline calcium deficient hydroxyapatite
incorporation in glass ionomer cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
2012;7:69-76. |
|
|
|
9. Sharafeddin F,Alavi AA,
Zare S. Fracture resistance of structurally compromised premolar roots
restored with single and accessory glass or quartz fiber posts.Dent Res J.
2014;11:264-271. PMid:24932200 PMCid:PMC4052655 |
|
|
|
10. Garoushi S, Lassila
LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Static and fatigue compression test for
particulate filler composite resin with fiber-reinforced composite
substructure. Dent Mater. 2007;23:17-23. |
|
|
|
11. Hammouda IM.
Reinforcement of conventional glass-ionomer restorative material with short
glass fibers. J mech behav biomed mater. 2009;2:73-81. |
|
|
|
12. Lohbauer U,
Frankenberger R, Clare A, Petschelt A, Greil P. Toughening of dental glass
ionomer cements with reactive glass fibres. Biomat. 2004;25:5217-25. |
|
|
|
13. Kobayashi M, Miyai K,
Asaoka K. Strengthening of glass-ionomer cement by compounding short Fibers
with CaO-P2O5-SiO2-Al2O3 glass. Biomat 2000;21:2051-8. PMid:10966014 |
|
|
|
14. Sharafeddin F, Tondari
A, Alavi AA. The Effect of Adding Glass and Polyethylene Fibers on Flexural
Strength of Three Types of Glass-Ionomer Cements. Res J Bio Sci. 2013;8:66-70. |
|
|
|
15. Sidhu SK. Clinical
evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater.
2010;26:7-12. |
|
|
|
16. Kobayashi M, Miyai K,
Asaoka K. Strengthening of glass-ionomer cement by compounding short Fibers
with CPSA glass. Biomaterials 2000;21:2051-8. PMid:10966014 |
|
|
|
17. Sidhu S. Glass-ionomer
cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J. 2011;56:23-30. |
|
|
|
18. Ray BC. Effects of
crosshead velocity and sub-zero temperature on mechanical behavior of
hygrothermally conditioned glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Sci
Eng. 2004;379:39-44. |
|
|
|
19.
Cefaly DF, Valarelli FP, Seabra BG,Mondelli RF, Navarro MF. Effect of time on the diametral tensile strength of
resin modified restorative glass ionomer cements and compomer. Braz Dent J.
2001;12:201-4. |
|
|
|
20.
Coldebella CR, Santos-Pinto L, Zuanon AC. Effect of ultrasonic excitation on the porosity of glass ionomer
cement: a scanning electron microscope evaluation. Microsc Res Tech.
2011;74:54-7. |
|
|
|
21. Irie M, Maruo Y,
Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous
glass-ionomer restorations: delayed vs immediate polishing. Oper Dent. 2008;33:196-202. PMid:18435195 |
|
|
|
22. Sharafeddin F, Yousefi
H, Modiri Sh, Tondari A. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations
with fiber inserts using two adhesives after aging. J Dent (Shiraz).
2013;14:90-5. PMid:24724129 PMCid:PMC3927678 |
|
|
|
23. Sharafeddin F, Bahrani
S. Load bearing capacity of fragmented incisal edges restored with two
different positions of fiber reinforced composite restoration. J Dent
(Shiraz) 2011;11:23-8. |
|
|
|
24. Tavakkol O, Mortazavi
MV, Sharafeddin F, Alavi AA. Effect of Glass Fiber Length on Flexural
Strength of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin. WJD 2012;3:131-5. |
|
|
|
25. Sharafeddin F, Talei
Z, Alav AA. Flexural Strength of Glass and Polyethylene Fiber Combined
withThree Different Composites. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013;14:13-9. PMid:24724111 PMCid:PMC3927662 |
|
|
|
26. Chenga YY, Lib JW,
Fokb SL, CheungcWL, Chowa TW. 3D FEA of high-performance polyethylene fiber
reinforced maxillary dentures. Dent Mater 2010;26:211-9. |
|
|
|
27. Keshtkar M, Heuzey MC,
Carreau PJ. Rheological behaviour of fiber filled model suspensions: effect
of fiber flexibility. J Rheol. 2009;53:631-50. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|