1. Almuhtaseb E, Mao J, Mahony D, Bader R, Zhang
ZX. Three-dimensional localization of impacted canines
and root resorption assessment using cone beam computed
tomography. J Huazhong Univ
Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2014;34-425-30.
|
|
2. Yadiki JV, Kategari YB, Chada
P, Vallakatla V. Can Milk Teeth be Impacted? Why Not: A
Case of Six Impacted Primary Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr
Dent. 2014;7:220-2.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1270
PMid:25709307 PMCid:PMC4335118
|
|
|
3. Park JH, Srisurapol T, Tai K.
Impacted maxillary canines: diagnosis and management. Dent Today. 2012;31:62, 64-6.
PMid:23019849
|
|
|
4.
Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ,
et al. Comparative analysis of
traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography
volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning
of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 2010;137:590-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.035
PMid:20451777
|
|
|
5. Wriedt S, Jaklin J, Al-Nawas
B, Wehrbein H. Impacted upper canines: examination and
treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop. 2012;73:28-40. Deutsche.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0058-8
PMid:22246048
|
|
|
6. Fu PS, Wang JC, Wu YM, Huang
TK, Chen WC, Tseng YC, et al. Unilaterally impacted
maxillary central incisor and canine with ipsilateral
transposed canine-lateral incisor. Angle Orthod.
2013;83:920-6.
https://doi.org/10.2319/010213-5.1
PMid:23560978
|
|
|
7. Dalessandri D, Migliorati M,
Visconti L, Contardo L, Kau CH, Martin C. KPG index
versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D
methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty
level for patients with impacted maxillary canines. Biomed Res Int. 2014;537620.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/537620
|
|
|
8. Syrynska M, Budzynska A. [The
incidence of uni- and bilateral impacted maxillary
canines and their position in dental arch depending on
gender and age]. Ann
Acad Med Stetin. 2008;54:132-7. Polish.
PMid:19374243
|
|
|
9. Kumar S, Mehrotra P,
Bhagchandani J, Singh A, Garg A, Kumar S, et al.
Localization of impacted canines. J Clin Diagn Res.
2015;9:11-4.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/10529.5480
|
|
|
10. Sajnani AK, King NM.
Complications associated with the occurrence and
treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Singapore Dent J. 2014;35:53-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdj.2014.07.001
PMid:25496586
|
|
|
11. Rischen RJ, Breuning KH,
Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Records needed for
orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a
systematic review. PLoS one. 2013;8:e74186.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074186
PMid:24265669 PMCid:PMC3827061
|
|
|
12.
Dalessandri D, Migliorati M, Rubiano R, Visconti L,
Contardo L, Di Lenarda R, et al. Reliability of a
novel CBCT-based 3D classification system for maxillary
canine impactions in orthodontics: the KPG index. Scientific World J. 2013:921234.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234
|
|
|
13. Botticelli S, Verna C,
Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Two- versus
three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted
maxillary canines. Eur J
Orthod. 2011;33:344-9.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq102
PMid:21131389
|
|
|
14. Hong WH, Radfar R, Chung CH.
Relationship between the maxillary transverse dimension
and palatally displaced canines: A cone-beam computed
tomographic study. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:440-5.
https://doi.org/10.2319/032614-226.1
PMid:25098187
|
|
|
15. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi
A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine
for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique:
preliminary results. Eur Radiol.
1998;8:1558-64.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050586
PMid:9866761
|
|
|
|
16. Hodges RJ, Atchison KA,
White SC. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on
orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop . 2013;143:665-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.12.011
PMid:23631968
|
|
|
|
17. Nakajima A, Sameshima GT,
Arai Y, Homme Y, Shimizu N, Dougherty H, Sr. Two- and
three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone
beam-computed tomography. Angle
Orthod. 2005;75:895-903.
PMid:16448229
|
|
|
|
18. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS,
Nanjannawar LG, Parushetti AD. CBCT in orthodontics: the
wave of future. J
Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:153-7.
PMid:23579915
|
|
|
|
19. Seth V, Kamath P, Vaidya N.
Cone beam computed tomography: third eye in diagnosis and
treatment planning. Int J
Orthod Milwaukee. 2012;23:17-22.
PMid:22873019
|
|
|
|
20. Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad
Esmaeili E, Robinson S. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with
panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0379-4
PMid:25575868 PMCid:PMC4330237
|
|
|
|
21. Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt MR,
Major PW, Carey JP, Heo G. Measurement accuracy and
reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT
reconstructed panoramic radiographs. Dental Press J
Orthod. 2014;19:45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar
PMid:25715716 PMCid:PMC4296663
|
|
|
|
22. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws
S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed
tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for
localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection
of root resorption. Eur J
Orthod. 2011;33:93-102.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq034
PMid:21270321
|
|
|
|
23. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, van
Keirsbilck PJ, Aly M, Swinnen S, Fieuws S, et al. The
effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction
and its impact on the orthodontic treatment outcome. J Orthod Sci. 2014;3:34-40.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.132911
PMid:24987661 PMCid:PMC4077106
|
|
|
|
24. Becker A, Chaushu S,
Casap-Caspi N. Cone-beam computed tomography and the
orthosurgical management of impacted teeth. J Am Dent
Assoc. 2010;141:14S-8S.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0360
PMid:20884935
|
|
|
|
25. Laffranchi L, Dalessandri D,
Fontana P, Visconti L, Sapelli P. Cone beam computed
tomography role in diagnosis and treatment of impacted
canine patient's: a case report. Minerva Stomatol. 2010;59:363-76.
PMid:20588224
|
|