1. Mc Comb D, Smith DC.A
preliminary scanning electron microscopic study
of root canals after endodontic procedures. J
Endod. 1975;1:238-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3
PMid:1061799
|
|
2. Gutmann JL. Clinical,
radiographic, and histologic perspectives on
success and failure in endodontics. Dent Clin
North Am. 1992;36:379-92.
PMid:1572505
|
|
|
3. Siqueira JF Jr.
Etiology of root canal treatment failure: why
well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J.
2001;34:1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x
PMid:11307374
|
|
|
4. Ram Z. Effectiveness of
root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol. 1977; 44:306-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7
PMid:268582
|
|
|
5. Villas-Boas MH,
Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC, Marciano M,
Carpio-Perochena A, de Moraes GI, et al. Micro–computed
tomography study of the internal anatomy of
mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod.
2011;37:1682-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.001
PMid:22099905
|
|
|
6. Mu-oz HR, Camacho
Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different
endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant
delivery to working length of mesial canals of
mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012;38:445-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007
PMid:22414827
|
|
|
7. Ruddle CJ.
Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dent
Today. 2007; 26:114-7.
PMid:17348279
|
|
|
8. de Gregorio C,
Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N.
Effect of EDTA, sonic and ultrasonic activation
on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into
simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J
Endod. 2009;35:891-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.015
PMid:19482193
|
|
|
9. Miller TA,
Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the antimicrobial
efficacy of irrigation using the endovac to
endodontic needle delivery. J Endod.
2010;36:509-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.008
PMid:20171372
|
|
|
10. Matsumoto H,
Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant
flow and cavitation induced by Er: YAG laser
within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011;37:839-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035
PMid:21787501
|
|
|
11. Takeda FH, Harashima
T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of
the removal of smear layer by three endodontic
Irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J.
1999;32:32-39.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
PMid:10356467
|
|
|
12. DiVito E, Lloyd A.
ER: YAG laser for 3-dimensional debridement of
canal systems: use of photon-induced
photoacoustic streaming. Dent Today.
2012;31:122,124-7.
PMid:23189912
|
|
|
13. Pedulla E, Genovese
C, Campagna E, Tempera G, Rapisarda E.
Decontamination efficacy of photon-initiated
photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) of irrigants using
low-energy laser settings: an ex vivo study. Int
Endod J. 2012;45:865-70.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02044.x
PMid:22486805
|
|
|
14. Ruddle CJ.
Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dentistry
Today. 2007;26:114-7.
PMid:17348279
|
|
|
15. J. M. Parente,
R.J.Loushine, L.Susin, L.Gu, S.W. Looney,
R.N.Weller, et al. Root canal debridement using manual
dynamic irrigation or the EndoVac for final
irrigation in a closed system and an open system.
Int Endod J. 2010;43:1001-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01755.x
PMid:20722753
|
|
|
16. Yost RA, Bergeron BE, Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts MD, Roberts HW, Himel VT, et al. Evaluation of
Four Different Irrigating Systems for Apical
Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite. J Endod.
2015;41:1530-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.007
PMid:26143609
|
|
|
17. Matthew Brunson,
Carlos Heilborn, D. James Johnson. Effect of
Apical Preparation Size and Preparation Taper on
Irrigant Volume Delivered by Using Negative
Pressure Irrigation System. J Endod. 2010;36:721-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.028
PMid:20307751
|
|
|
18. Hulsmann M, Hahn W.
Complications during root canal irrigation:
literature review and case reports. Int Endod J.
2000;33:186-93.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00303.x
PMid:11307434
|
|
|
19. Chris Siu, J. Craig
Baumgartner. Comparison of the Debridement
Efficacy of the EndoVac Irrigation System and Conventional
Needle Root Canal Irrigation In Vivo. J Endod.
2010;36:1782-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.023
PMid:20951287
|
|
|
20. Uroz-Torres D,
González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of the
EndoActivator System in Removing the Smear Layer
after Root Canal Instrumentation. J Endod.
2010;35:308-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029
PMid:20113797
|
|
|
21. Guidotti R, Merigo
E, C Fornaini, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P.
Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic
treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers
Med Sci. 2014;29:69-75.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1217-x
PMid:23212445
|
|
|
22. Mancini M, Cerroni
L, Iorio L , Armellin E, Cianconi L. Smear Layer
Removal and Canal Cleanliness Using Different
Irrigation Systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and
Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation): Field Emission
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation in an In
Vitro Study. J Endod. 2013; 39:1456-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028
PMid:24139274
|
|
|
23. Arslan D, Guneser
MB, Dincer AN, Kustarci A, Er K, Siso SH.
Comparison of Smear Layer Removal Ability of QMix
with Different Activation Techniques. J Endod.
2016;42:1279-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.022
PMid:27287613
|
|
|
24. de Gregorio C, Arias
A, Navarrete N, Del Rio V, Oltra E, Cohenca
N.Effect of apical size and taper on volume of
irrigant delivered at working length with apical
negative pressure at different root curvatures. J
Endod 2013;39:119-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.008
PMid:23228270
|
|
|
25. Brunson M, Heilborn
C, Johnson DJ, Cohenca N. Effect of apical
preparation size and preparation taper on
irrigant volume delivered by using negative
pressure irrigation system. J Endod.
2010;36:721-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.028
PMid:20307751
|
|
|
26. Perez-Heredia M,
Ferrer-Luque CM, Gonzalez-Rodrıguez MP. The effectiveness of
different acid irrigating solutions in root canal
cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J
Endod. 2006;32:993-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.016
PMid:16982281
|
|
|
27. Baker NA, Eleazer
PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron
microscopic study of the efficacy of various
irrigating solutions. J Endod. 1975;1:127-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80097-5
PMid:765422
|
|
|
28. Baumgartner JC,
Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of
sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J
Endod. 1992;18:605-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81331-2
PMid:1298800
|
|
|
29. Ciucchi B, Khettabi
M, Holz J. The effectiveness of different
endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of
the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic
study. Int Endod J. 1989;22:21-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00501.x
PMid:2513277
|
|
|
30. Takeda FH, Harashima
T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of
the removal of smear layer by three endodontic
irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J.
1999;32:32-39.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
PMid:10356467
|
|
|
31. Armengol V, Jean A,
Marion D. Temperature rise during Er: YAG and Nd:
YAG laser ablation of dentin. J Endod.
2000;26:138-41.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00002
PMid:11199705
|
|
|
32. Matsuoka E,
Jayawardena JA, Matsumoto K. Morphological study
of the Er, Cr: YSGG laser for root canal
preparation in mandibular incisors with curved
root canals. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23:480-4.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.480
PMid:16262578
|
|
|
33. Yamazaki R, Goya C,
Yu DG, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of erbium,
chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root canal
walls: a scanning electron microscopic and
thermographic study. J Endod. 2001;27:9-12.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00003
PMid:11487170
|
|
|
34. Kimura Y, Yonaga K,
Yokoyama K, Kinoshita JI, Ogata Y, Matsumoto K.
Root surface temperature increase during Er: YAG
laser irradiation of root canals. J Endod.
2002;28:76-8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200202000-00006
PMid:11833692
|
|
|
35. Macedo RG, Wesselink
PR, Zaccheo F, Fanali D, Van Der Sluis LW.
Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine
dentine: effect of activation, exposure time,
concentration and Ph. I Endod J. 2010;43:1108-15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01785.x
PMid:20812947
|
|
|
36. Gutknecht N, Franzen
R, Meister J, Vanweersch L, Mir M. Temperature
evolution on human teeth root surface after diode
laser assisted endodontic treatment. Lasers Med
Sci. 2005;20:99-103.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-005-0347-9
PMid:16007476
|
|
|
37. Tay FR, Gu LS,
Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K et al.
Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by
using a side vented needle for positive pressure
irrigant delivery. J Endod. 2010;36:745-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.022
PMid:20307757 PMCid:PMC2844877
|
|
|
38. Abarajithan M, Dham
S, Velmurugan N, Albuquerque VD, Ballal S,
Senthilkumar H. Comparison of EndoVac irrigation
system with conventional irrigation for removal
of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2011;112:407-411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024
PMid:21664151
|
|
|
39. Ram Z. The
effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;44:306-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7
PMid:268582
|
|
|
40. Salzgeber RM,
Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the
penetration of an irrigating solution in root
canals. J Endod. 1977;3:394-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80172-6
PMid:270543
|
|
|
41. O'Connell MS, Morgan
LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative
study of smear layer removal using different
salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26:739-43.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00019
PMid:11471645
|
|
|
42. Heilborn C, Reynolds
K, Johnson JD, Cohenca N. Cleaning efficacy of an
apical negative pressure irrigation system at
different exposure times. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:759-67.
PMid:20806100
|
|
|
43. Nielson BA, Craig
Baumgartner J. Comparison of the EndoVac to
needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod.
2007;33:611-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.020
PMid:17437884
|
|
|
44. Desai P, Himel V.
Comparative safety of various intracanal
irrigation systems. J Endod. 2009;35:545-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.011
PMid:19345802
|
|
|
45. Castagnola R,
Lajolo C, Minciacchi I, Cretella G, Foti R, Marigo
L, et al. Efficacy of three
different irrigation techniques in the removal of
smear layer and organic debris from root canal
wall:a scanning electron microscope study. G Ital
Endod. 2014;28:79-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2014.09.001
|
|
|
46. Klyn SL, Kirkpatrick
TC, Rutledge RE. In Vitro Comparisons of Debris
Removal of the EndoActivator System, the F File,
Ultrasonic Irrigation, and NaOCl Irrigation Alone
after Hand-rotary Instrumentation in Human
Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2010;36:1367-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.022
PMid:20647098
|
|
|
47. Uroz Torres D,
Gonzalez M P, Ferrer CM. Effectiveness of the endo
activator system in removing the smear layer
after root canal instrumentation. J Endod. 2010;36:308-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029
PMid:20113797
|
|
|
48. de Groot SD, Verhaagen
B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der
Sluis. LW. Laser-activated irrigation within root
canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization.
Int Endod J. 2009;42:1077-83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01634.x
PMid:19912378
|
|
|
49. George R, Meyers IA,
Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic
irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips
for removing smear layer in the apical third of
the root canal. J Endod. 2008;34:1524-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.029
PMid:19026887
|
|
|
50. Deleu, E, Meire MA,
De Moor RJ.Efficacy of laser-based irrigant
activation methods in removing debris from
simulated root canal irregularities. Lasers
Med Sci. 2015;30:831-5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1442-y
PMid:24091791
|
|