Suman S, Verma P, Prakash-Tikku A, Bains R, Kumar-Shakya V. A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Apical Negative Pressure (EndoVac), Sonic Irrigation (EndoActivator) and Er:YAG laser -An In Vitro SEM Study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(8):e981-7.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.53881

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.53881

 

References

 

1. Mc Comb D, Smith DC.A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975;1:238-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3

PMid:1061799

 

2. Gutmann JL. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspectives on success and failure in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1992;36:379-92.
PMid:1572505

 

3. Siqueira JF Jr. Etiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001;34:1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x

PMid:11307374

 

4. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977; 44:306-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7

PMid:268582

 

5. Villas-Boas MH, Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC, Marciano M, Carpio-Perochena A, de Moraes GI, et al. Micro–computed tomography study of the internal anatomy of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2011;37:1682-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.001
PMid:22099905

 

6. Mu-oz HR, Camacho Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012;38:445-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007
PMid:22414827

 

7. Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dent Today. 2007; 26:114-7.
PMid:17348279

 

8. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Effect of EDTA, sonic and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2009;35:891-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.015
PMid:19482193

 

9. Miller TA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigation using the endovac to endodontic needle delivery. J Endod. 2010;36:509-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.008
PMid:20171372

 

10. Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er: YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011;37:839-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035
PMid:21787501

 

11. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic Irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J. 1999;32:32-39.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
PMid:10356467

 

12. DiVito E, Lloyd A. ER: YAG laser for 3-dimensional debridement of canal systems: use of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming. Dent Today. 2012;31:122,124-7.
PMid:23189912

 

13. Pedulla E, Genovese C, Campagna E, Tempera G, Rapisarda E. Decontamination efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) of irrigants using low-energy laser settings: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2012;45:865-70.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02044.x
PMid:22486805

 

14. Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection: tsunami endodontics. Dentistry Today. 2007;26:114-7.
PMid:17348279

 

15. J. M. Parente, R.J.Loushine, L.Susin, L.Gu, S.W. Looney, R.N.Weller, et al. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic irrigation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J. 2010;43:1001-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01755.x
PMid:20722753

 

16. Yost RABergeron BEKirkpatrick TCRoberts MDRoberts HWHimel VTet al.  Evaluation of Four Different Irrigating Systems for Apical Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite. J Endod. 2015;41:1530-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.007
PMid:26143609

 

17. Matthew Brunson, Carlos Heilborn, D. James Johnson. Effect of Apical Preparation Size and Preparation Taper on Irrigant Volume Delivered by Using Negative Pressure Irrigation System. J Endod. 2010;36:721-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.028
PMid:20307751

 

18. Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation: literature review and case reports. Int Endod J. 2000;33:186-93.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00303.x
PMid:11307434

 

19. Chris Siu, J. Craig Baumgartner. Comparison of the Debridement Efficacy of the EndoVac Irrigation System and Conventional Needle Root Canal Irrigation In Vivo. J Endod. 2010;36:1782-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.023
PMid:20951287

 

20. Uroz-Torres D, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in Removing the Smear Layer after Root Canal Instrumentation. J Endod. 2010;35:308-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029
PMid:20113797

 

21. Guidotti R, Merigo E, C Fornaini, Rocca JP, Medioni E, Vescovi P. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29:69-75.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1217-x
PMid:23212445

 

22. Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L , Armellin E, Cianconi L. Smear Layer Removal and Canal Cleanliness Using Different Irrigation Systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation): Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation in an In Vitro Study. J Endod. 2013; 39:1456-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028
PMid:24139274

 

23. Arslan D, Guneser MB, Dincer AN, Kustarci A, Er K, Siso SH. Comparison of Smear Layer Removal Ability of QMix with Different Activation Techniques. J Endod. 2016;42:1279-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.022
PMid:27287613

 

24. de Gregorio C, Arias A, Navarrete N, Del Rio V, Oltra E, Cohenca N.Effect of apical size and taper on volume of irrigant delivered at working length with apical negative pressure at different root curvatures. J Endod 2013;39:119-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.008
PMid:23228270

 

25. Brunson M, Heilborn C, Johnson DJ, Cohenca N. Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system. J Endod. 2010;36:721-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.028
PMid:20307751

 

26. Perez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, Gonzalez-Rodrıguez MP. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 2006;32:993-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.016
PMid:16982281

 

27. Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions. J Endod. 1975;1:127-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80097-5

PMid:765422

 

28. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1992;18:605-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81331-2

PMid:1298800

 

29. Ciucchi B, Khettabi M, Holz J. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 1989;22:21-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00501.x
PMid:2513277

 

30. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J. 1999;32:32-39.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
PMid:10356467

 

31. Armengol V, Jean A, Marion D. Temperature rise during Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser ablation of dentin. J Endod. 2000;26:138-41.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00002
PMid:11199705

 

32. Matsuoka E, Jayawardena JA, Matsumoto K. Morphological study of the Er, Cr: YSGG laser for root canal preparation in mandibular incisors with curved root canals. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23:480-4.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.480
PMid:16262578

 

33. Yamazaki R, Goya C, Yu DG, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of erbium, chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic and thermographic study. J Endod. 2001;27:9-12.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00003
PMid:11487170

 

34. Kimura Y, Yonaga K, Yokoyama K, Kinoshita JI, Ogata Y, Matsumoto K. Root surface temperature increase during Er: YAG laser irradiation of root canals. J Endod. 2002;28:76-8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200202000-00006
PMid:11833692

 

35. Macedo RG, Wesselink PR, Zaccheo F, Fanali D, Van Der Sluis LW. Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and Ph. I Endod J. 2010;43:1108-15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01785.x
PMid:20812947

 

36. Gutknecht N, Franzen R, Meister J, Vanweersch L, Mir M. Temperature evolution on human teeth root surface after diode laser assisted endodontic treatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2005;20:99-103.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-005-0347-9
PMid:16007476

 

37. Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side vented needle for positive pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod. 2010;36:745-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.022
PMid:20307757 PMCid:PMC2844877

 

38. Abarajithan M, Dham S, Velmurugan N, Albuquerque VD, Ballal S, Senthilkumar H. Comparison of EndoVac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2011;112:407-411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024
PMid:21664151

 

39. Ram Z. The effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;44:306-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7

PMid:268582

 

40. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod. 1977;3:394-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80172-6

PMid:270543

 

41. O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26:739-43.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00019
PMid:11471645

 

42. Heilborn C, Reynolds K, Johnson JD, Cohenca N. Cleaning efficacy of an apical negative pressure irrigation system at different exposure times. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:759-67.
PMid:20806100

 

43. Nielson BA, Craig Baumgartner J. Comparison of the EndoVac to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod. 2007;33:611-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.020
PMid:17437884

 

44. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod. 2009;35:545-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.011
PMid:19345802

 

45. Castagnola R, Lajolo C, Minciacchi I, Cretella G, Foti R, Marigo L, et al. Efficacy of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall:a scanning electron microscope study. G Ital Endod. 2014;28:79-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2014.09.001

 

46. Klyn SL, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. In Vitro Comparisons of Debris Removal of the EndoActivator System, the F File, Ultrasonic Irrigation, and NaOCl Irrigation Alone after Hand-rotary Instrumentation in Human Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2010;36:1367-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.022
PMid:20647098

 

47. Uroz Torres D, Gonzalez M P, Ferrer CM. Effectiveness of the endo activator system in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. J Endod. 2010;36:308-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029
PMid:20113797

 

48. de Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis. LW. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1077-83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01634.x
PMid:19912378

 

49. George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal. J Endod. 2008;34:1524-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.029
PMid:19026887

 

50. Deleu, E, Meire MA, De Moor RJ.Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:831-5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1442-y
PMid:24091791