San José V, Bellot-Arcís C, Tarazona B, Zamora N, O Lagravère M, Paredes-Gallardo V. Dental measurements and Bolton index reliability and accuracy obtained from 2D digital, 3D segmented CBCT, and 3d intraoral laser scanner. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(12):e1466-73.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.54228

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.54228

 

References

1. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. New, fast and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2D measurement digital method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:518-519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.025
PMid:15821697

 

2. Naidu D, Scott, J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J. 2009;25:97-103.
PMid:20043542

 

3. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H, Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:288-295.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
PMid:19893964

 

4. Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP, Major PW. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:1098-1106.
https://doi.org/10.2319/110311-681.1
PMid:22530811

 

5. Poleti ML, Fernandes TM, Pagin O, Moretti MR, Rubira-Bullen IR. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:179-185.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1485-5
PMid:25963719

 

6. Lightheart KG, English JD, Kau CH, Akyalcin S, Bussa HI Jr, McGrory KR, McGrory KJ. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141:686-693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.019
PMid:22640670

 

7. Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr005
PMid:21427171

 

8. Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:435-439.
https://doi.org/10.2319/083109-491.1
PMid:20050733

 

9. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:259-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030
PMid:20152684

 

10. Wiranto M, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET, van der Meer W, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143;140-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
PMid:23273370

 

11. Kim J, Heo G, Lagravère MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:443-450.
https://doi.org/10.2319/051213-365.1
PMid:23957664

 

12. Kim J, Lagravère MO. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46:13-19.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.13
PMid:26877978 PMCid:PMC4751296

 

13. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:831-837.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.014
PMid:24286906

 

14. Hernandez Y, Tarazona, B, Zamora N, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy in measuring mesiodistal tooth sizes using three different methods: 2D digital, 3D CBCT, and 3D CBCT segmented. Oral Radiol. 2015;3:165-171.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-015-0204-x

 

15. Naidu D, Freer TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:304-310.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011
PMid:23910212

 

16. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:471-478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
PMid:23992820

 

17. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:308-813.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
PMid:22920696

 

18. Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandía JL, Paredes V. Evaluation of the validity of the Bolton Index using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e878-883.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18069
PMid:22549690 PMCid:PMC3482537

 

19. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization of dental casts; comparison with the traditional method. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:120-125.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji077
PMid:16373454

 

20. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958;28:113-130.

 

21. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:504-529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(62)90129-X