1. Paredes V, Gandia JL,
Cibrian R. New, fast and accurate procedure to
calibrate a 2D measurement digital method. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:518-519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.025
PMid:15821697
|
|
2. Naidu D, Scott, J, Ong D,
Ho CT. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of
three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton
analyses. Aust Orthod J.
2009;25:97-103.
PMid:20043542
|
|
|
3.
Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H,
Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability
and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3
digital models. Braz Oral Res.
2009;23:288-295.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
PMid:19893964
|
|
|
4. Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG,
Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP,
Major PW. Linear measurements using virtual study
models. Angle Orthod.
2012;82:1098-1106.
https://doi.org/10.2319/110311-681.1
PMid:22530811
|
|
|
5. Poleti ML,
Fernandes TM, Pagin O, Moretti MR, Rubira-Bullen IR. Analysis of linear
measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data
segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set
thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an
in vitro study. Clin Oral
Investig. 2016;20:179-185.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1485-5
PMid:25963719
|
|
|
6. Lightheart KG, English
JD, Kau CH, Akyalcin S, Bussa HI Jr, McGrory KR,
McGrory KJ. Surface analysis of study models
generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed
tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2012;141:686-693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.019
PMid:22640670
|
|
|
7. Tarazona B, Llamas JM,
Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between
dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those
taken from a digital method. Eur
J Orthod. 2013;35:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr005
PMid:21427171
|
|
|
8. Kau CH, Littlefield J,
Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT
digital models and traditional models using the
Little's Index. Angle Orthod.
2010;80:435-439.
https://doi.org/10.2319/083109-491.1
PMid:20050733
|
|
|
9. El-Zanaty
HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy
AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental
measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:259-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030
PMid:20152684
|
|
|
10. Wiranto M, Engelbrecht
WP, Nolthenius HET, van der Meer W, Ren Y. Validity,
reliability, and reproducibility of linear
measurements on digital models obtained from
intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of
alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2013;143;140-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
PMid:23273370
|
|
|
11. Kim J, Heo G, Lagravère
MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to
plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle
Orthod. 2014;84:443-450.
https://doi.org/10.2319/051213-365.1
PMid:23957664
|
|
|
12. Kim J, Lagravère MO.
Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned
digital models compared with plaster models (gold
standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images.
Korean J Orthod. 2016;46:13-19.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.13
PMid:26877978 PMCid:PMC4751296
|
|
|
13. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ,
English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental
models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy
and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:831-837.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.014
PMid:24286906
|
|
|
14. Hernandez Y, Tarazona,
B, Zamora N, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V.
Comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy in
measuring mesiodistal tooth sizes using three
different methods: 2D digital, 3D CBCT, and 3D CBCT
segmented. Oral Radiol.
2015;3:165-171.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-015-0204-x
|
|
|
15. Naidu D, Freer TJ.
Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC
intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton
ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2013;144:304-310.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011
PMid:23910212
|
|
|
16. Flügge TV, Schlager S,
Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of
intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and
extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model
scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2013;144:471-478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
PMid:23992820
|
|
|
17. Cuperus AM, Harms MC,
Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a
validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2012;142:308-813.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
PMid:22920696
|
|
|
18. Tarazona B, Llamas JM,
Cibrián R, Gandía JL, Paredes V. Evaluation of the
validity of the Bolton Index using cone-beam computed
tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2012;17:e878-883.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18069
PMid:22549690 PMCid:PMC3482537
|
|
|
19. Paredes V, Gandia JL,
Cibrian R. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios
by digitization of dental casts; comparison with the
traditional method. Eur J
Orthod. 2006;28:120-125.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji077
PMid:16373454
|
|
|
20. Bolton WA. Disharmony in
tooth size and its relation to the analysis and
treatment of malocclusion. Angle
Orthod. 1958;28:113-130.
|
|
|
21. Bolton WA. The clinical
application of a tooth-size analysis. Am
J Orthod. 1962;48:504-529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(62)90129-X
|
|