Almaqrami BS, Alhammadi MS, Cao B. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(4):e352-60.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.54578

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.54578

 

References

1. Taylor CM. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A, and point B and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod. 1969;56:143-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90231-0

PMid:4898272

 

2. Beatty EJ. A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:303-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90238-9

PMid:1057851

 

3. Ferrazzini G. Critical evaluation of the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:620-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90144-5

PMid:1064333

 

4. Freeman RS. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:162-71.
PMid:6942667

 

5. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:411-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90162-3

PMid:6586080

 

6. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2

PMid:1054214

 

7. Jacobson A. Application of the "Wits" appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:179-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(76)90318-3

 

8. Zhou L, Mok CW, Hagg U, McGrath C, Bendeus M, Wu J. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:1023-9.
https://doi.org/10.2319/100107-467.1
PMid:18947277

 

9. Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:117-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90366-0

 

10. Nanda RS, Merrill RM. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:328-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70127-X

PMid:8154458

 

11. Hall-Scott J. The maxillary-mandibular planes angle (MM degrees) bisector: a new reference plane for anteroposterior measurement of the dental bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:583-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70143-1

PMid:8198083

 

12. AL-hammadi K, Labib A, Heider. Dentoskeletal OJ. A New Method for Assessment of Sagittal Jaw Relation. Aust J Basic App Sci. 2011;5:1830-36.

 

13. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:100-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.026

PMid:15224065

 

14. Sherman SL, Woods M, Nanda RS, Currier GF. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:429-36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90103-5

PMid:3163222

 

15. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:133-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90177-X

PMid:6576637

 

16. Jacobson A. Update on the Wits appraisal. Angle Orthod. 1988;58:205-19.
PMid:3056122

 

17. Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e678-88.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17721
PMid:22322503 PMCid:PMC3476034

 

18. Zamora N, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e725-32.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18919
PMCid:PMC3731105

 

19. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:122-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C

PMid:1990821

 

20. Jarvinen S. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:432-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90134-5

PMid:3189246

 

21. Jarvinen S. A comparison of two angular and two linear measurements used to establish sagittal apical base relationship. Eur J Orthod. 1981;3:131-4.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/3.2.131
PMid:6941890

 

22. Palleck S, Foley TF, Hall-Scott J. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:426-35.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112450
PMid:11298316

 

23. Foley TF, Stirling DL, Hall-Scott J. The reliability of three sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:320-6; discussion 7-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70263-4

PMid:9294363

 

24. Singh G, Verma S, Singh DP, Yadav SK, Yadav AB. Correlation of Beta Angle with Antero-Posterior Dysplasia Indicators and FMA: An Institution Based Cephalometric Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:Zc75-zc8.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/23553.8912

PMid:28050509 PMCid:PMC5198462

 

25. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:714-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70181-8

PMid:10842115

 

26. Kapoor DN, Chandna A, Shalini T. Linear assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2004;22:187-92.
PMid:15855715

 

27. Aparna P, Kumar DN, Prasad M, Shamnur N, G AK, K RS, et al. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:Zc38-41.
PMid:26023641 PMCid:PMC4437157

 

28. Ferrario V, Sforza C, Miani Jr A, Tartaglia G. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies. Clinical orthodontics and research. 1999;2:34-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.1999.2.1.34
PMid:10534977

 

29. Asad S, Naeem S, Hamid WU. Corelaton of corrected ANB angle with other sagital discrepancy indicators. Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2007:199-204.