Fernández-Pazos G, Martín-Biedma B, Varela-Patiño P, Ruíz-Piñón M, Castelo-Baz P. Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(11):e1091-5.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.54910

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/jced.54910

 

References

1. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32:1031-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.008
PMid:17055902

 

2. Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PMH. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:569-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.033
PMid:23611371

 

3. Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from roots canal. Int Endod J. 2005;38:112-23.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00916.x
PMid:15667633

 

4. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of ProFile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root Canals. Part I. Int Endod J. 1997;30:1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01093.x
PMid:9477788

 

5. Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod. 2016;42:1840-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.015
PMid:27776878

 

6. Martín B, Zelada G, Varela P, Bahillo JG, Magán F, Ahn S, et al. Factors influencing the fracture of nickeltitanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;36:262-6.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00630.x
PMid:12702120

 

7. Ounsi HF, Salameh Z, Al-Shalan T, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:737-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.006
PMid:17509417

 

8. Haikei Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999;25:434-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80274-X

 

9. Uygun AD, Kol E, Topcu MKC, Seckin F, Ersoy I, Tanriver M. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. Int Endod J. 2016;49:494-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12471
PMid:26011308

 

10. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files afterclinical use. J Endod. 2000;26:161-5.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
PMid:11199711

 

11. Inan U, Gonulol N. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotatory nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2009;35:1396-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.014
PMid:19801238

 

12. Lopes HP, Gambarra-Soares T, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr, Inojosa IF, Lopes WS, et al. Comparison of the mechanical properties of rotary instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, or nickel-titanium alloy in R-phase. J Endod. 2013;39:516-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.006
PMid:23522548

 

13. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34:1003-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
PMid:18634935

 

14. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijma M, Clark WA, Kovarik L, Buie C, et al. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1589-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.004
PMid:19840654

 

15. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermo-mechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:163-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005
PMid:23321225

 

16. Bonessio N, Pereira ESJ, Lomiento G, Arias A, Bahia MG, Buono VT, et al. Validated finite element analyses of WaveOne endodontic instruments: a comparison between M-Wire and NiTi alloy. Int Endod J. 2015;48:441-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12333
PMid:24923193

 

17. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Assessment of the mechanical properties of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2014;40:1830-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.011
PMid:25129026

 

18. Pérez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments as different levels. J Endod. 2014;40:1477-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.025
PMid:25146037

 

19. Ye J, Gao Y. Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod. 2012;38:105-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.028
PMid:22152631

 

20. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Matchou P. Influence of rotational speed, torque and opertator´s proficiency on ProFile failures. Int Endod J. 2001;34:47-53.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00352.x
PMid:11307380

 

21. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2004;30:722-5.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129963.42882.C9
PMid:15448468

 

22. Shen Y, Coil JM, Haapasalo M. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 3: a 4-year retrospective study from an undergraduate clinic. J Endod. 2009;35:193-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.003
PMid:19166771

 

23. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, Huang X, Liu L. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2007;33:276-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.012
PMid:17320713

 

24. Al-Hadlaq SMS, AlJarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-Wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:305-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.032
PMid:20113796