Evrard A,
Tepedino M, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Which factors influence orthodontists in
their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey. J Clin Exp Dent.
2019;11(5):e432-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.55709
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55709
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
1. Proffit WR. Contemporary
Orthodontics. 4th ed. St-Louis,
MO: Elsevier; 2007:276-279. |
|
|
|
2. Case CS. The question of
extraction in orthodontia. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:660-691. |
|
|
|
3. Tweed CH. Indications for
the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedures. Am J Orthod Oral
Surg. 1944;30:405-428. |
|
|
|
4. Tweed CH. The diagnostic
facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod.
1969;55:651-657. |
|
|
|
5. Miura F, Nakagawa K,
Masuhara E. New direct bonding system for plastic brackets. Am J Orthod.
1971;59:350-61. |
|
|
|
6. Brandt S, Root TL.
Interview: Dr. Terrell L. Root on headgear. J Clin Orthod. 1975;9:20-31,34-41. |
|
|
|
7. Creekmore TD. Inhibition
or stimulation of the vertical growth of the facial complex, its significance
to treatment. Angle
Orthod. 1967;37:285-297. |
|
|
|
8. Harvold EP, Vargervik K.
Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:478-490. |
|
|
|
9. Pfeiffer JP, Grobety D.
Simultaneous use of cervical appliance and activator: an orthopedic approach
to fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:353-373. |
|
|
|
10. Poulton DR. The
influence of extraoral traction. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:8-18. |
|
|
|
11. Little RM, Wallen TR,
Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first
premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod.
1981;80:349-365. |
|
|
|
12. Bravo LA, Canut JA,
Pascual A, Bravo B. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after
orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions. Br J Orthod.
1997;24:25-34. |
|
|
|
13. Kocadereli I. Changes in
soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:67-72. |
|
|
|
14. Bishara SE, Cummins DM,
Zaher AR. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II,
Division I malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:18-27. |
|
|
|
15. Drobocky OB, Smith RJ.
Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of
four first premolars. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:220-230. |
|
|
|
16.
Erdinc AE, Nandra RS, Dandajena TC. Profile
changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:324-331. |
|
|
|
17. Luppanapornlarp S,
Johnston LE. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of
outcomes in « clear-cut » extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod.
1993;63:257-272. |
|
|
|
18. Young TM, Smith RJ.
Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during
nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:452-458. |
|
|
|
19. Holman JK, Hans MG,
Nelson S, Powers MP. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction
orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod.
1998;68:527-534. |
|
|
|
20. Vaden JL, Kiser HE.
Straight talk about extraction and nonextraction: A differential diagnostic
decision. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:445-452. |
|
|
|
21. Jackson TH, Guez C, Lin
F-C, Proffit WR, Ko Ch-C. Extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic
clinic in the 21st century: Demographic and diagnostic factors affecting the
likelihood of extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;151:456-462. |
|
|
|
22. Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M.
Factors affecting treatment decisions for Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop. 2018;154:234-237. |
|
|
|
23. Anderson JP, Joondeph
DR, Turpin DL. A cephalometric study of profile changes in orthodontically
treated cases ten years out of retention. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:324-336. |
|
|
|
24. Koch R, Gonzales A, Witt
E. Profile and soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1979;1:193-199. |
|
|
|
25. Yogosawa F. Predicting
soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod.
1990;60:199-206. |
|
|
|
26. Hodges A, Rossouw PE,
Campbell PM, Boley JC, Alexander RA, Buschang PH. Prediction of lip response
to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults.
Angle Orthod. 2009;79:413-421. |
|
|
|
27. Moseling KP, Woods MG.
Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction
treatment. Angle
Orthod. 2004;74:51-62. |
|
|
|
28. Tepedino M, Franchi L,
Fabbro O, Chimenti C. Post-orthodontic lower incisor inclination and gingival
recession - a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018;19: 1-7. |
|
|
|
29. Merrifield LL, Cross JJ.
Directional forces. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:435-464. |
|
|
|
30. Pearson LE. Vertical
control in fully-banded orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:205-224. |
|
|
|
31. Kouvelis G, Dritsas K,
Doulis I, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N. Effect of orthodontic treatment with 4
premolar extractions compared with nonextraction treatment on the vertical
dimension of the face: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.
2018;154:175-187. |
|
|
|
32. Little RM. Stability and
relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:235-241. |
|
|
|
33. Damon DH. Treatment of
the face with biocompatible orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig
KWL, ed. Orthodontics. Current principles and techniques. 4th ed. St-Louis,
MO: Elsevier; 2005:753. |
|
|
|
34. Booth FA, Edelman JM,
Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded
mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2008;133:70-76. |
|
|
|
35. Littlewood SJ, Millett
DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a
systematic review. J Orthod. 2006;33:205-212. |
|
|
|
36. Baumrind S, Korn EL,
Boyd RL, Maxwell R. The decision to extract: Part 1 Interclinician agreement.
Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:297-309. |