Gómez-Gómez SL, Sánchez-Obando N, Álvarez-Castrillón MA, Montoya-Goez Y, Ardila CM. Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(5):e439-46.

doi:10.4317/jced.55739

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References

1. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;124:403-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00504-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00501-8

2. Fourie Z, Ozcan M, Sandham J. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;136:14e1-14e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.026

3. Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T. Friction of Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets Using a 10 Bracket Model. Angle Orthod 2005;75:7-9.

4. Uribe Restrepo GA. La fuerza de friccion en ortodoncia. Ortodoncia, teoría y clínica. Segunda Ed. Medellín, Colombia: Coorporación para Investigaciones Biológicas.; 2010. p. 384-387.

5. Stefanos S, Secchi A, Coby G, Tanna N, Manted F. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;138:463-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.029 PMid:20889052

6. Kahlon S, Rinchuse D, Robison J. e evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;138:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.023 PMid:20620835

7. Krishnan M, Kalathil S, Abraham K. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;136:674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.034 PMid:19892284

8. Eshani S, Mandich M-A, El-Bialy TH, Flores-Mir C. Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2009;79:592-601. https://doi.org/10.2319/060208-288.1 PMid:19413397

9. Calao E, Vázquez M, Becerra Santos F, Ossa J, Enríquez C, Fresneda B. El método de elementos finitos y su aplicación en la investigación odontológica / The finite elements method and its application to dental research. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 1999;11:44-49.

10. Kojima Y, Mizuno T, Fukui H. A numerical simulation of tooth movement produced by molar uprighting spring. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:630-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.035 PMid:18005837

11. Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;138:702.e1-702.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.015

12. Kojima Y, Fukui H. A finite element simulation of initial movement, orthodontic movement, and the centre of resistance of the maxillary teeth connected with an archwire. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr123 PMid:22051537

13. Hortua A, Ocampo M, Pérez AM. Comparación de la distribución de esfuerzos y deformaciones en la activación de un sistema de retracción con dos brackets de autoligado(smartclip® vs damon®). análisis por elementos finitos. Rev Odontos 2007;28:37-47.

14. Gomez Mira A, Chica Arrieta E, Latorre Correa F. Analisis de la distribucion de esfuerzos en diferentes elementos de retencion intraradicular prefabricado. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2008;20:31-42.

15. Angle EH. classification of the maloclusion. Dental Cosmos 1899;41:248-264

16. Cerrud Sánchez SM, Narváez Clemente MY, Muñoz González V, Schouwenaars R. Modelado del comportamiento mecánico del hueso (Análisis de los efectos del grado de hidratación ). Ing Mecánica - Tecnol y Desarro 2005;1:223-232.

17. Isaza JF, Correa S. Desarrollo de un modelo FEM del complejo craneofacial para simular tratamientos en CLASE III esqueletica. Rev CES Odont 2010;23:49-55.

18. Gómez SL, Montoya Y, García N, Virgen A, Botero JE Comparison of frictional resistance among conventional, active and passive selfligating brackets with different combinations of arch wires: a finite elements study. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2016;29:130-136

19. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 2005;84:428-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400506 PMid:15840778

20. Khambay B, Millett D, Mchugh S. Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:302-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji008 PMid:15947232

21. Pillai A, Gangadharan A, Kumar S, Shah A. Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2014;6:150-155. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.137429 PMid:25210359 PMCid:PMC4157255

22. Kumar S, Singh S, Rani Hamsa PR, Ahmed S, Prasanth M, Bhatnagar A, et al. Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations - an in vitro study. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2014;8:33-36.

23. Vinay K, Venkatesh M, Nayak R, Pasha J, Rajesh M, Kumar P. A comparative study to evaluate the effects of ligation methods on friction in sliding mechanics using 0.022" slot brackets in dry state: An In-vitro study. J Int Oral Heal. 2013;6:76-83.

24. Miles PG. Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 132: 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.028 PMid:17693373

25. Burrow SJ. Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets. Angle Orthod 2010;80:438-445. https://doi.org/10.2319/060809-322.1 PMid:20482346

26. Khoo E, Tran J, Abey M, Raptis M, Teixeira CC, Alikhani M. Accelerated Orthodontic Treatment. Dentista & paciente 2010;285:30-38.

27. Smith D V, Rossouw PE, Watson P. Quantified simulation of canine retraction: evaluation of frictional resistance. Semin Orthod 2003;9:262-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sodo.2003.08.006

28. Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the Frictional Resistance of Conventional and Self-ligating Bracket Designs Using Standardized Archwires and Dental Typodonts. Angle Orthod 2004;74:202-211.

29. Chimenti C, Franchi L, Grazia M, Giuseppe D, Lucci M. Friction of Orthodontic Elastomeric Ligatures with Different Dimensions. Angle Orthod 2005;75:421-425

30. Field C, Ichim I, Swain M V., Chan E, Darendeliler MA, Li W, et al. Mechanical responses to orthodontic loading: A 3-dimensional finite element multi-tooth model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;135:174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.032 PMid:19201323