Castrillón-Marín RA, Barbosa-Liz DM, Ardila CM. Treatment of Class III
malocclusion using Hybrid Hyrax, Face Mask and Alt-RAMEC Protocol: A Case
Report in a Latin-American patient. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(7):e665-9.
doi:10.4317/jced.55939
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55939
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
1. Heymann G, Cevidanes L,
Cornelis M, De Clerck H, Tulloch C. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary
protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:274-284. |
|
|
|
2. Turley PK. Managing the
developing Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and facemask
therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:349-352 |
|
|
|
3. Kircelli BH, Pekta ZO.
Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored facemask therapy: a novel
approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:440-449. |
|
|
|
4. Turley PK. Treatment of
the Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod. 2007;13:143-157. |
|
|
|
5. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M,
Drescher D. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne
rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax. World J Orthod. 2010;11:323-330. |
|
|
|
6. Cevidanes L, Baccetti T,
Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, De Clerck H. Comparison of two protocols for
maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary
expansion. Angle
Orthod. 2010;80:799-806. |
|
|
|
7. Masucci C, Franchi L,
Giuntini V, Defraia E. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol
for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthod Craniofac
Res. 2014;17:259-269. |
|
|
|
8. Foersch M, Jacobs C,
Wriedt S, Hechtner M, Wehrbein H. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction
using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Clin
Oral Investig. 2015;19:1181-1192. |
|
|
|
9. Shimizu Y, Arx JDV,
Ustrell JM, Ono T. Comparison of cephalometric variables between adult
Spanish and Japanese women with Class I malocclusion. J Orthod Sci. 2018;7:19. |
|
|
|
10. Johe RS, Steinhart T,
Sado N, Greenberg B, Jing S. Intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies in
different sexes, malocclusion groups, and ethnicities. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:599-607. |
|
|
|
11. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis
MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla
with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2123-2129. |
|
|
|
12. Westwood PV, McNamara JA
Jr., Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III
treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by
fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:306-320. |
|
|
|
13. Koh SD, Chung DH.
Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-boren facemask according
to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36: 86-92. |
|
|
|
14. Keles A, Tokmak EC,
Erverdi N, Nanda R. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary
orthopedic protraction. Angle
Orthod. 2002;72:387-396. |
|
|
|
15.
Baccetti T, Sigler LM, McNamara JA Jr. An RCT on treatment of palatally displaced canines with RME and/or a
transpalatal arch. Eur
J Orthod. 2011;33:601-607 |