Castrillón-Marín RA, Barbosa-Liz DM, Ardila CM. Treatment of Class III malocclusion using Hybrid Hyrax, Face Mask and Alt-RAMEC Protocol:  A Case Report in a Latin-American patient. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(7):e665-9.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.55939

http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55939

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

References

1. Heymann G, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, De Clerck H, Tulloch C. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:274-284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.009
PMid:20152686 PMCid:PMC2910400

 

2. Turley PK. Managing the developing Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:349-352
https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.127295
PMid:12411878

 

3. Kircelli BH, Pekta ZO. Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored facemask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:440-449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.011
PMid:18331946

 

4. Turley PK. Treatment of the Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod. 2007;13:143-157.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2007.05.005

 

5. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax. World J Orthod. 2010;11:323-330.

 

6. Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, De Clerck H. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:799-806.
https://doi.org/10.2319/111709-651.1
PMid:20578848 PMCid:PMC2930261

 

7. Masucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Defraia E. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014;17:259-269.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12051
PMid:25041370

 

8. Foersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S, Hechtner M, Wehrbein H. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1181-1192.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1478-4
PMid:25982454

 

9. Shimizu Y, Arx JDV, Ustrell JM, Ono T. Comparison of cephalometric variables between adult Spanish and Japanese women with Class I malocclusion. J Orthod Sci. 2018;7:19.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_66_18
PMid:30271764 PMCid:PMC6144760

 

10. Johe RS, Steinhart T, Sado N, Greenberg B, Jing S. Intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies in different sexes, malocclusion groups, and ethnicities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:599-607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.031
PMid:21055600

 

11. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2123-2129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.007
PMid:19761906 PMCid:PMC2910397

 

12. Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr., Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:306-320.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.44
PMid:12637903

 

13. Koh SD, Chung DH. Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-boren facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36: 86-92.
https://doi.org/10.2319/060313-421.1
PMid:24274955

 

14. Keles A, Tokmak EC, Erverdi N, Nanda R. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:387-396.

 

15. Baccetti T, Sigler LM, McNamara JA Jr. An RCT on treatment of palatally displaced canines with RME and/or a transpalatal arch. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:601-607
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq139
PMid:21059877