Sharafeddin F,
Jowkar Z, Bahrani S. Comparison between the effect of adding
microhydroxyapatite and chitosan on surface roughness and Microhardness of
resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cements. J Clin Exp Dent.
2021;13(8):e737-44.
doi:10.4317/jced.55996
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55996
___________
References
|
1.
Senthil Kumar R, Ravikumar N, Kavitha S, Mahalaxmi S, Jayasree R, Sampath
Kumar TS, et al. Nanochitosan modified glass ionomer cement with enhanced
mechanical properties and fluoride release. Int J of Biol Macromol.
2017;104:1860-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface
roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent.
2012;6:79-86. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Sharafeddin F, Shoale S, Kowkabi M. Effects of Different Percentages of
Microhydroxyapatite on Microhardness of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer and
Zirconomer. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e805-e11. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Sharafeddin F, Bakhtiarvand NA, Jowkar Z. Evaluation of the effect of home
bleaching gel on microleakage of different glass ionomers reinforced with
micro-hydroxyapatite. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:64-8. PMid:30820085
PMCid:PMC6385584 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Jowkar Z, Jowkar M, Shafiei F. Mechanical and dentin bond strength properties
of the nanosilver enriched glass ionomer cement. J Clin Exp Dent.
2019;11:e275-81. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Sharafeddin F, Ghaboos SA, Jowkar Z. The effect of short polyethylene fiber
with different weight percentages on diametral tensile strength of
conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Clin Exp Dent.
2017;9:e466-e70. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a
conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and
antibacterial properties. J Dent. 2011;39:589-98. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Petri DF, Donega J, Benassi AM, Bocangel JA. Preliminary study on chitosan
modified glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1004-10. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Kim DA, Lee JH, Jun SK, Kim HW, Eltohamy M, Lee HH. Sol-gel-derived bioactive
glass nanoparticle-incorporated glass ionomer cement with or without chitosan
for enhanced mechanical and biomineralization properties. Dent Mater.
2017;33:805-17. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Zhao T, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhao X. Nano-hardness, wear resistance and
pseudoelasticity of hafnium implanted NiTi shape memory alloy. J Mech Behav Biomed
Mater. 2012;13:174-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Debnath A, Kesavappa SB, Singh GP, Eshwar S, Jain V, Swamy M, et al.
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial and Adhesive Properties of Chitosan
Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: an In
vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:Zc75-zc8. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Arita K, Yamamoto A, Shinonaga Y, Harada K, Abe Y, Nakagawa K, et al.
Hydroxyapatite particle characteristics influence the enhancement of the
mechanical and chemical properties of conventional restorative glassionomer
cement. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:672-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Movasaghi Z, Billington RW, Darr JA, Rehman IU.
Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone
containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical
properties. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1381-90. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu A, Garcia-Godoy F, Brambilla E. Surface
properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: A review
of the current literature. Am J Dent. 2015;28:311-20. PMid:26846036 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Goenka S, Balu R, Kumar TS. Effects of nanocrystalline calcium deficient
hydroxyapatite incorporation in glass ionomer cements. J Mech Behav Biomed
Mater. 2012;7:69-76. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of mixing time on the handling
and compressive strength of an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater.
2005;21:704-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Beriat NC, Nalbant D. Water absorption and HEMA release of resin-modified glass-ionomers.
Eur J Dent. 2009;3:267-72. PMid:19826597
PMCid:PMC2761156 |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Wang XY, Yap AU, Ngo HC. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of
glass ionomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 2006;31:584-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Ando S, Miyazaki M, Garcia-Godoy F. Effects of
polishing on surface roughness and gloss of S-PRG filled flowable resin
composite. Am J Dent. 2012;25:227-30. PMid:23082387 |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Bayindir YZ, Yildiz M. Surface hardness properties of resin-modified glass
ionomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract.
2004;5:42-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Mobarak E, Elsayad I, Ibrahim M, El-Badrawy W. Effect of LED light-curing on
the relative hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent.
2009;34:65-71. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Gonulol N, Ozer S, Tunc ES. Effect of a third-generation LED LCU on
microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Int J Paediatr Dent.
2016;26:376-82. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Carvalho F, Sampaio C, Fucio S, Carlo H, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani R.
Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three
glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite. Oper Dent. 2012;37:509-17. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Wu SS, Yap AU, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of prophylaxis regimens on surface
roughness of glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 2005;30:180-4. PMid:15853102 |
|