Ajami S,
Morovvat A, Khademi B, Jafarpour D, Babanouri N. Dentoskeletal effects of class
II malocclusion treatment with the modified Twin Block appliance. J Clin Exp
Dent. 2019;11(12):e1093-8.
doi:10.4317/jced.56241
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56241
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
|
1. D'antò V, Bucci R, Franchi L,
Rongo R, Michelotti A, Martina R. Class II functional orthopaedic treatment:
a systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of oral rehabilitation.
2015;42:624-42. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Pakshir H, Mokhtar A, Darnahal
A, Kamali Z, Behesti MH, Jamilian A. Effect of bionator and farmand appliance
on the treatment of mandibular deficiency in prepubertal stage. Turkish J
Orthod. 2017;30:15-20. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Perillo L, Padricelli G, Isola
G, Femiano F, Chiodini P, Mataresei G. Class II malocclusion division 1: a
new classification method by cephalometric analysis. European Journal of Paediatric
Dentistry. 2012;13:192. PMid:22971255 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Baysal A, Uysal T. Soft tissue
effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II
division 1 mandibular retrognathy. The European Journal of Orthodontics.
2011;35:71-81. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Khoja A, Fida M, Shaikh A.
Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in
subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical
vertebral maturation stages. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2016;21:73-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Proffit W, Fields H. Sarver
DMContemporary Orthodontics 4th EditionMosby. Inc, St Louis. 2007:167-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Varlık SK, Gültan A, Tümer N.
Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft
tissue profile. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30:128-34. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Ahmadian-Babaki F,
Araghbidi-Kashani SM, Mokhtari S. A cephalometric comparison of Twin Block
and bionator appliances in treatment of class II malocclusion. Journal of
clinical and experimental dentistry. 2017;9:e107. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Lee KY, Park JH, Tai K, Chae
JM. Treatment with Twin-Block appliance followed by fixed appliance therapy
in a growing Class II patient. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial
Orthopedics. 2016;150:847-63. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan
M. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by
cone-beam computed tomography. The Angle Orthodontist. 2014;84:1018-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Shen G, Darendeliler M.
Cephalometric evaluation of condylar and mandibular growth modification: a
review. Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2006;9:2-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Saikoski LZ, Cançado RH,
Valarelli FP, Freitas KMSd. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion
treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective
study. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2014;19:36-45. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Franchi L, Pavoni C, Faltin Jr
K, McNamara Jr JA, Cozza P. Long-term skeletal and dental effects and
treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. The
Angle Orthodontist. 2012;83:334-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H.
Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-Block and bionator appliances in
the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. American journal
of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2006;130:594-602. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW,
Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F,
Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic
treatment with the Twin-Block appliance: a multicenter, randomized,
controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. American journal of
orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2003;124:234-43. PMid:12970656 |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT.
A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part
I-The hard tissues. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998;20:501-16. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Gilmore WA. Morphology of the
adult mandible in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion and in excellent
occlusion. The angle Orthodontist. 1950;20:137-46. PMid:14790323 |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Gill D, Sharma A, Naini F,
Jones S. The Twin Block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
Dental update. 2005;32:158-68. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Toth LR, McNamara Jr JA.
Treatment effects produced by the Twin-Block appliance and the FR-2 appliance
of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1999;116:597-609. PMid:10587592 |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The
effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998;113(1):104-10. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Quintão C, Helena I, Brunharo
V, Menezes RC, Almeida MA. Soft tissue facial profile changes following
functional appliance therapy. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2005;28:35-41. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT.
A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. The
European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998;20:663-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue
cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.
American journal of orthodontics. 1983;84:1-28. PMid:6575614 |
|