Ortiz-Puigpelat O, Simões A, Caballé-Serrano J, Hernández-Alfaro F. Blood absorption capacity of different xenograft bone substitutes. An in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e1018-24.

doi:10.4317/jced.56317

http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56317

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

References

1. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:113-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x PMid:19663958

2. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:218-36. PMid:19885447

3. Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:606-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.12.004 PMid:24451333

4. Benić GI, Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hämmerle CHF. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:507-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01583.x PMid:19302239

5. Jung RE, Fenner N, Hämmerle CHF, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1065-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x PMid:22697628

6. Mir-mari J, Jung RE, Benic GI. Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials : an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. 2015;27:258-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12590 PMid:25856209

7. Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Schenk RK. Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: A clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:420-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5 PMid:8600258

8. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone Augmentation Techniques. J Periodontol. 2007;78:377-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060048 PMid:17335361

9. Misch CEM, Resnik RR, Ismail YH. Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:360-6. PMid:1289262

10. Gottlow J. Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: initial healing and long-term results. J Periodontol. 1993;64:1157-65. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1157 PMid:29539697

11. Simion M, Rocchietta I, Kim D, Nevins M, Fiorellini J. Vertical ridge augmentation by means of deproteinized bovine bone block and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a histologic study in a dog model. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:415-23. PMid:17073351

12. Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:19-25. PMid:17956571

13. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Ferrari D, Sager M, Becker J. Lateral ridge augmentation using particulated or block bone substitutes biocoated with rhGDF-5 and rhBMP-2: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:642-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01537.x PMid:18492078

14. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Balic E, Buser D, Becker J, Sager M. Lateral ridge augmentation using equine- and bovine-derived cancellous bone blocks: A feasibility study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:904-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01951.x PMid:20491835

15. Felice P, Piana L, Checchi L, Corvino V, Nannmark U, Piattelli M. Vertical Ridge Augmentation of an Atrophic Posterior Mandible with an Inlay Technique and Cancellous Equine Bone Block: A Case Report. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2013;33:159-66. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1098 PMid:23484171

16. Ortiz-Vigón A, Suarez I, Martínez-Villa S, Sanz-Martín I, Bollain J, Sanz M. Safety and performance of a novel collagenated xenogeneic bone block for lateral alveolar crest augmentation for staged implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:36-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13036 PMid:28710793

17. Pistilli, Felice, Piatelli, Nisii, Barausse E. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7:153-71. PMid:24977250

18. De Santis E, Lang NP, Scala A, Vigano P, Salata LA, Botticelli D. Healing outcomes at implants installed in grafted sites: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:340-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02326.x PMid:22092302

19. De Santis E, Lang NP, Favero G, Beolchini M, Morelli F, Botticelli D. Healing at mandibular block-grafted sites. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:516-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12434 PMid:24921198

20. Scarano A. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates : case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1125-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02083.x PMid:21251081

21. Chang BS, Lee CK, Hong KS, Youn HJ, Ryu HS, Chung SS, et al. Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1291-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00030-2 PMid:10811311

22. Lecomte A, Gautier H, Bouler JM, Gouyette A, Pegon Y, Daculsi G, et al. Biphasic calcium phosphate: A comparative study of interconnected porosity in two ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2008;84:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30569 PMid:17907206

23. Hannink G, Arts JJC. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: What is optimal for bone regeneration? Injury. 2011;42:S22-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008 PMid:21714966

24. Chappard D, Fressonnet C, Geni C. Fat in bone xenografts: importance of the purification procedures on cleanliness, wettability and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 1993;14:507-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90238-W PMid:8329523

25. Salgado PC, Sathler PC, Castro HC, Alves GG, Oliveira AM de, Oliveira RC de, et al. Bone Remodeling, Biomaterials And Technological Applications: Revisiting Basic Concepts. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2011;02:318-28. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2011.23039

26. Thomas M V, Puleo DA. Infection, Inflammation, and bone regeneration: a Paradoxical relationship. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1052-1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510393967 PMid:21248364 PMCid:PMC3169879

27. Bignon A, Chouteau J, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G, Carret JP, Chavassieux P, et al. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:1089-97. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004006.90399.b4 PMid:15348502