Ngan Y, Bollu P, Chaudhry K, Stevens R, Subramani K. Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(7):e656-62.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.56976

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56976

________________________________________

 

References

1. Bishara SE, Fehr DE. Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review. Seminars in orthodontics. 1997;3:178-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80068-0

 

2. Feldner JC, Sarkar NK, Sheridan JJ, Lancaster DM. In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:265-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70046-X

 

3. Choudhary G, Gill V, Reddy YNN, Sanadhya S, Aapaliya P, Sharma N. Comparison of the Debonding Characteristics of Conventional and New Debonding Instrument used for Ceramic, Composite and Metallic Brackets - An Invitro Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR. 2014;8:ZC53-ZC5.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9370.4617
PMid:25177639 PMCid:PMC4149145

 

4. Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:34-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70271-3

 

5. Flores DA, Caruso JM, Scott GE, Jeiroudi MT. The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study. The Angle orthodontist. 1990;60:269-76.

 

6. Ostby AW, Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. In Vitro Comparison of the Debonding Characteristics of 2 Pliers Used for Ceramic Brackets. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2010;16:76-82.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2009.12.007

 

7. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 1990;98:145-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z

 

8. Chen HY, Su MZ, Chang HF, Chen YJ, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 2007;132:680-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035
PMid:18005844

 

9. Sarp AS, Gulsoy M. Ceramic bracket debonding with ytterbium fiber laser. Lasers in medical science. 2011;26:577-84.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0817-6
PMid:20658306

 

10. Ghazanfari R, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Alikhasi M. Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2016;7:2-11.
https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2016.02
PMid:27330690 PMCid:PMC4908986

 

11. Cochrane NJ, Lo TWG, Adams GG, Schneider PM. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152:312-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.020
PMid:28863911

 

12. Boyer DB, Engelhardt G, Bishara SE. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 1995;108:262-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70019-6

 

13. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:263-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81604-X

 

14. Sheridan JJ, Brawley G, Hastings J. Electrothermal debracketing. Part I. An in vitro study. American journal of orthodontics. 1986;89:21-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90109-0

 

15. Sheridan JJ, Brawley G, Hastings J. Electrothermal debracketing. Part II. An in vivo study. American journal of orthodontics. 1986;89:141-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90090-4

 

16. Macri RT, de Lima FA, Bachmann L, Galo R, Romano FL, Borsatto MC, et al. CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets. Lasers in Medical Science. 2015;30:1835-41.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1688-z
PMid:25410302

 

17. Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Fraticelli D, Roncallo S, Gandini P. Epidemiological survey of different clinical techniques of orthodontic bracket debonding and enamel polishing. J Orthod Sci. 2015;4:123-7.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.173425
PMid:26952141 PMCid:PMC4759976

 

18. Gibbs SL. Clinical Performance of Ceramic Brackets: A survey of British orthodontists' experience. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1992;19:191-7.
https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.191
PMid:1294085

 

19. Kraut J, Radin S, Trowbridge HI, Emling RC, Yankell SL. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets. The Journal of clinical dentistry. 1991;2:92-6.

 

20. Bisharaa SE. Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000;117:595-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70212-5