García-Gil I, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J, Jiménez-García J, Peláez-Rico J, Suárez-García MJ. Precision and practical usefulness of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry: A systematic literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(8):e784-93.

doi:10.4317/jced.57025

________________

References

1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132. PMid:356184

2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25. PMid:3527955

3. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000;71:546-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546 PMid:10807116

4. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x PMid:15691354

5. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:22-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x PMid:23062125

6. Joda T, Bragger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1304-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12270 PMid:25040237

7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 PMid:19631508

8. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276-82. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

9. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 PMid:20613859 PMCid:PMC2893951

10. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251 PMid:20352064 PMCid:PMC2844794

11. Moreno A, Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Pradies G. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology. Implant Dent. 2013;22:320-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182980fe9 PMid:23817542

12. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312 PMid:22937030 PMCid:PMC3425565

13. Flugge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, Nelson K. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:277-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4417 PMid:27148990

14. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004 PMid:26803173

15. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:853-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3343 PMid:25032765

16. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Triangulation Technology With Blue Light for Implants: Effect of Clinically Relevant Parameters. Implant Dent. 2015;24:498-504. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000283 PMid:26057777

17. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:e54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12124 PMid:23879869

18. Gimenez B, Pradies G, Martinez-Rus F, Ozcan M. Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:56-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3689 PMid:25615916

19. Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Ozcan M, Pradies G. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:650-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12457 PMid:26934046

20. Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:648-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12853 PMid:27150731

21. Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163107 PMid:27684723 PMCid:PMC5042463

22. Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 PMid:28577366 PMCid:PMC5455075

23. Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:e185-e189. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12600 PMid:25864771

24. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 PMid:24210732

25. Gherlone EF, Ferrini F, Crespi R, Gastaldi G, Cappare P. Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive "all-on-four" restorations. Implant Dent. 2015;24:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000206 PMid:25621560

26. Gherlone E, Cappare P, Vinci R, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, Crespi R. Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for "All-on-Four" Restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:324-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3900 PMid:27004280

27. Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:715-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12375 PMid:24720423 PMCid:PMC4428303

28. Lin WS, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Abdel-Azim T, Morton D. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:102-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3592 PMid:25615919

29. Chew AA, Esguerra RJ, Teoh KH, Wong KM, Ng SD, Tan KB. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: Effects of Different Scanners and Implant Level. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:70-80. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4942 PMid:27706264

30. Chia VA, Esguerra RJ, Teoh KH, Teo JW, Wong KM, Tan KB. In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: The Effect of Implant Angulation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:313-21. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5087 PMid:28231346

31. Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:574-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.002 PMid:28927923

32. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:465-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12567 PMid:25682892

33. Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1360-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12994 PMid:28039903

34. Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pera P, Pesce P. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1253-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9 PMid:28965251

35. Faggion CM Jr. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:182-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001 PMid:23177493

36. Rutkunas V, Geciauskaite A, Jegelevicius D, Vaitiekunas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:101-20. PMid:28944372

37. Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty MHM, Moharrami M. Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review. Implant Dent. 2017;26:929-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000683 PMid:29095786

38. Muhlemann S, Kraus RD, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:184-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13300 PMid:30306680

39. Flugge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:374-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13273 PMid:30328182

40. Rauscher O. Impressionless implant-supported restorations with Cerec 4.2. Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17:159-68. PMid:25098163