Salas H, Castrejon A, Fuentes D, Luque A, Luque E. Evaluation of the penetration of CHX 2% on dentinal tubules using Conventional Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation (EDDY) and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) techniques: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(1):e37-42.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.57065

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57065

_____

 

References

1. Ma J, Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. A new noninvasive model to study the effectiveness of dentin disinfection by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Endod. 2011;37:1380-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.018
PMid:21924186

 

2. Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IDN, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e65.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0065
PMid:30365606

 

3. Giardino L, Cavani F, Generali L. Sodium hypochlorite solution penetration into human dentine: a histochemical evaluation. Int Endod J. 2017;50:492-498.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12641
PMid:27009869

 

4. Ando N, Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes invading the deep layers of root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 1990;23:20-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00798.x
PMid:2391177

 

5. Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1375-9.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660081801
PMid:3114347

 

6. Nissan R, Segal H, Pashley D, Stevens R, Trowbridge H. Ability of bacterial endotoxin to diffuse through human dentine. J Endod. 1995;21:62-4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81096-4

 

7. Wong DT, Cheung GS. Extension of bactericidal effect of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2014;40:825-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.045
PMid:24862710

 

8. Küçük M, Kermeoğlu F. Efficacy of different irrigation methods on dentinal tubule penetration of Chlorhexidine, QMix and Irritrol: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Aust Endod J. 2019;45:202-208.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12309
PMid:30230129

 

9. Vadhana S, Latha J, Velmurugan N. Evaluation of penetration depth of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate into root dentinal tubules using confocal laser scanning microscope. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40:149-54.
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.2.149
PMid:25984477 PMCid:PMC4432258

 

10. Zandi H, Petronijevic N, Mdala I, Kristoffersen AK, Enersen M, Rôças IN, et al. Outcome of Endodontic Retreatment Using 2 Root Canal Irrigants and Influence of Infection on Healing as Determined by a Molecular Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2019;45:1089-1098.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.05.021
PMid:31300248

 

11. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014;216:299-303.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204
PMid:24651335

 

12. Mcdonnell G, Russell D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:147-179.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.1.147
PMid:9880479 PMCid:PMC88911

 

13. Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod. 2012;38:37-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.013
PMid:22152617

 

14. Haapasalo M1, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:291-312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2009.12.001
PMid:20433979

 

15. Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:2681-2687.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x
PMid:28185091

 

16. Plotino G, Pameijer C, Grande NM, Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2007;33:81-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008
PMid:17258622

 

17. Akcay M, Arslan H, Mese M, Durmus N, Capar ID. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic, and sonic irrigation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: a confocal microscopic study. Clinical Oral Investig. 2017;21:2205-2212.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2013-y
PMid:27921170

 

18. Gu Y, Perinpanayagam H, Kum DJ, Yoo YJ, Jeong JS, Lim SM, et al. Effect of different agitation techniques on the penetration of irrigant and sealer into dentinal tubules. Photomedicine and Laser Surg. 2017;35:71-77.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4125
PMid:27929924

 

19. Llena C, Forner L, Cambralla R, Lozano A. Effect of three different irrigation solutions applied by passive ultrasonic irrigation. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40:143-8.
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.2.143
PMid:25984476 PMCid:PMC4432257

 

20. Cherian B, Gehlot PM, Manjunath MK. Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Octenidine Dihydrochloride and Chlorhexidine with and Without Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation - An Invitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC71-7.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17911.8021
PMid:27504415 PMCid:PMC4963775

 

21. Tartari T, Wichnieski C, Bachmann L, Jafelicci M Jr, Silva RM, Letra A, et al. Effect of the combination of several irrigants on dentine surface properties, adsorption of chlorhexidine and adhesion of microorganisms to dentine. Int Endod J. 2018;51:1420-1433.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12960
PMid:29862516

 

22. Kim J, Uchiyama T, Carrilho M, Agee K, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, et al. Chlorhexidine binding to mineralized versus demineralized dentin powder. Dental Mater. 2010;26:771-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.001
PMid:20472280 PMCid:PMC2900509

 

23. Al-Jadaa A, Paqué F, Attin T, Zehnder M. Necrotic pulp dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals: impact of canal location and angulation. Int Endod J. 2009;42:59-65.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01497.x
PMid:19125981

 

24. Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod. 2006;32:1091-1093.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.008
PMid:17055914

 

25. Bukiet F, Soler T, Guivarch M, Camps J, Tassery H, Cuisinier F, et al. Factors affecting the viscosity of sodium hypochlorite and their effect on irrigant flow. Int Endod J. 2013;46:954-961.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12086
PMid:23480363

 

26. Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J. 2005;38:285-90.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x
PMid:15876291

 

27. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using different flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:144-55.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01503.x
PMid:19134043

 

28. Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis LWM. Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different needle types by an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod. 2010;36:87-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.026
PMid:20416437

 

29. Van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40:415-26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
PMid:17442017

 

30. Ohl CD, Wolfum B. Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave induced cavitation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1624:131-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.10.005
PMid:14642823