Rożniatowski P,
Korporowicz E, Gozdowski D, Olczak-Kowalczyk D. Clinical study on resin
composite and glass ionomer materials in II class restorations in permanent
teeth. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(2):e165-71.
doi:10.4317/jced.57572
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57572
___________
References
|
1.
Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons
for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45-64. PMid:11317384 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF. A
clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations. 17-year findings. J
Dent. 2006;34:427-35. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Baldissera RA, Corrêa MB, Schuch HS, Collares K, Nascimento GG, Jardim PS, et
al. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior
teeth? J Dent. 2013;41:1027-35. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Jorge MF, Navarro MF.
Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites. 2-year follow-up.
Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10:197-203. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Forss H, Widström E. The post-amalgam era. a selection of materials and their
longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions. Int J Paediatr Dent.
2003;13:158-64. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components.
a review. Clin Oral Invest. 2008;12:1-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich
restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1319-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Modified class II open
sandwich restorations. evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of
different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:270-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, Von Doussa RJ. Chemical exchange
between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent
molars. an in vivo study. J Dent. 2006;34:608-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Dalli M, Çolak H, Mustafa Hamidi M. Minimal intervention concept. a new
paradigm for operative dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:167-75. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N. Viscous glass-ionomer cements. a new
alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition? Quintes Int. 1997;28:667-76. PMid:9477887 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Nagaraja UP, Kishore G. Glass ionomer cement - the different generations.
Trends Biomater. Artif Organs. 2005;18:158-65. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative
materials - fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial
activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):343-62. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Kato K, Yarimizu H, Nakaseko H, Sakuma T. Influence of coating material on
conventional glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res. 2008;87:487. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal
intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review. report of a FDI
task group. Int Dent J. 2012;62:223-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Klinge S, Kunstmann K, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Clinical behavior of
viscous glassionomer cement in classes I and II cavities. J Dent Res. 1999;78:2285. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
World Health Organization. Oral health surveys. basic methods. Fifth edition.
Geneva 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze S, Peters S, Peters M, et al. FDI World
Dental Federation. clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and
indirect restorations - update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14:349-66. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kajka-Hawryluk K, Furmaniak K, Gromak-Zaremba J, Szopiński K. Zdjęcia zgryzowo-skrzydłowe
we współczesnej stomatologii dziecięcej. Nowa Stomatol. 2015;20:73-80. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer
based restoration system. a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011;27:1031-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten AL, Höigaard R. Longevity of
posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental
Health Service. a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent. 2013;41:297-306. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Cetin AgaR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and
indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:620-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Schoch M, Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. Direct posterior composite
restorations with a new adhesive system. one-year results. J Adhes Dent.
1999;1:167-73. PMid:11725682 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Four-year randomized
clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer
restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015;40:134-43. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Scholtanus JD, Huysmans MC. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a
highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period. a retrospective
study. J Dent. 2007;35:156-62. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Diem VT, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND. The effect of a nano-filled
resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional
high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:753-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Bonifácio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a
nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70:471-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Siedschlag G, Schubert EW, Lauerer B, Müller F et al.
Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel
nanofilled resin coating. Am J Dent. 2011;24:124-8. PMid:21698994 |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Tiwari S, Nandlal B. Effect of nano-filled surface coating agent on fluoride
release from conventional glass ionomer cement. an in vitro trial. J Indian
Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;31:91-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer
cement in primary molars. Int J Paed Dent. 2002;12:146-7. |
|