Tovar-Calderón MM, Barrera-Mora JM, Espinar-Escalona E, Puigdollers-Pérez A, Herrera-Martínez M, Llamas-Carreras JM. Class II subdivision: Cone beam computed tomography- CBCT Analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(8):e817-25.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.58383

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58383

___________

 

References

1. Minich CM, Araújo EA, Behrents RG, Buschang PH, Tanaka OM, Kim KB. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:57-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.026
PMid:23810046

 

2. Sanders DA, Rigali PH, Neace WP, Uribe F, Nanda R. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:542.e1-20; discussion 542-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.027
PMid:21055586

 

3. Cassidy SE, Jackson SR, Turpin DL, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145:443-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.017
PMid:24703282

 

4. Kurt G, Uysal T, Sisman Y, Ramoglu SI. Mandibular Asymmetry in Class II Subdivision Malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist. 2008;78:32-7.
https://doi.org/10.2319/021507-73.1
PMid:18193958

 

5. Delgado G.B, Villalpando C.M. Incidencia de deformidades dentofaciales en un hospital de especialidades. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43:155-159.

PMid:16089285

 

6. Booij JW, Livas C. Unilateral Maxillary First Molar Extraction in Class II Subdivision: An Unconventional Treatment Alternative. Case Report in Dentistry. 2016;2016:2168367.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2168367
PMid:27200194 PMCid:PMC4856937

 

7. Joondeph, Donald R. Mysteries of asymmetries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:577-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70205-8

PMid:10799120

 

8. Akyalcin S, Dogan S, Dincer B, Erdinc AM, Oncag G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:637-43.

PMid:16808571

 

9. Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg.1997;12:171-6.

PMid:9511487

 

10. Thiesen G, Gribel BF,Mota Freitas MP. Facial asymmetry: A current review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:110-25.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.110-125.sar
PMid:26691977 PMCid:PMC4686752

 

11. Walters M, Claes P, Kakulas E, et al. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:36-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.021
PMid:22749574

 

12. Bishara S, Burkey P, Kharouf J. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:89-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80018-2

PMid:8010527

 

13. Shroff B, Siegel S. Treatment of patients with asymmetries. Using asymmetric mechanics.1998;4:165-179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80018-2

PMid:9807153

 

14. Cohem M. Perspectives on craniofacial asymmery. III Common and/or well-known causes of asymmetry. Int. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1995;24:127-133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(06)80085-8

PMID: 7608575

 

15. Kawamoto HK, Kim SS, Jarrahy R, Bradley JP. Differential diagnosis of the idiopathic laterally deviated mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1599-609.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babc1f
PMid:20009847

 

16. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. [Corrected]. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:238-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002
PMid:23849378

 

17. Ipek Coskun, Burçak Kaya. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2018;31:55-61.
https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18020
PMid:30112515 PMCid:PMC6046632

 

18. Kanomi R, Deguchi T, Kakuno E, Takano-Yamamoto T, Roberts WE. CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase arch-length with a development-dependent bonded or banded appliance. The Angle orthodontist. 2013;83:851-7.
https://doi.org/10.2319/082012-669.1
PMid:23488528

 

19. Lin HH, Chuang YF, Weng JL, Lo LJ. Comparative Validity and Reproducibility Study of Various Landmark-Oriented Reference Planes in 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Analysis for Patients Receiving Orthognathic Surgery. PLos One. 2015;10:1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117604
PMid:25668209 PMCid:PMC4323243

 

20. Rahmati A, Ghafari R, AnjomShoa M. Normal Variations of Sphenoid Sinus and the Adjacent Structures Detected in Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2016;17:32-37.

PMid:26966706 PMCid:PMC4771050

 

21. Janson G, Araki J, Estelita S and Camardella LT. Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions. Progress in Orthodontics. 2014;30:15:67.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4
PMid:25547371 PMCid:PMC4279037

 

22. Alavi DG, BeGole EA, Schneider BJ. Facial and dental arch asymetries in Class II subdivision malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:38-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90191-6

 

23. Huang M, Hu Y, Yu J, Sun J, Ming Y, Zheng L. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint and dental characteristics of patients with class II subdivision malocclusion and asymmetry. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47:277-288.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.5.277
PMid:28861389 PMCid:PMC5548708