Da Silva D,
Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of the adhesive strategy in the sealing
ability of resin composite inlays after deep margin elevation. J Clin Exp Dent.
2021;13(9):e886-93.
doi:10.4317/jced.58689
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58689
___________
References
1.
Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival
cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach.
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010;5:50-76. |
||||
|
||||
2.
Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Joda T, Discepoli N.
Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month
results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018;69:70-6. |
||||
|
||||
3.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et
al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods
and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118-32. |
||||
|
||||
4.
Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FHO, De Lima AF, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Evaluation of
dentin hardness and bond strength at different walls of class II
preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:183-8. |
||||
|
||||
5.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al.
Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater.
2010;26:100-21. |
||||
|
||||
6.
Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical conceps for adhesive cementation of
tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent.
1998;10:47-54. |
||||
|
||||
7.
Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep Margin Elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet
Dent. 2012;2:86-96. |
||||
|
||||
8.
Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A,
et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal
quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent. 2012;40:1068-73. |
||||
|
||||
9.
Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin
elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol
Scand. 2013;71:317-24. |
||||
|
||||
10.
Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al.
Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture
behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite
onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1021-8. |
||||
|
||||
11.
Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding
systems. Dent Mater. 2000;16:48-56. |
||||
|
||||
12.
Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Vanloy A, Declerck D, Lambrechts P, Peumans M, et
al. Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach. Clin Oral
Investig. 2020;24:683-91. |
||||
|
||||
13.
Naga AA El, Yousef M, Ramadan R, Bahgat SF, Alshawwa L. Does the use of a
novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? Clin Cosmet
Investig Dent. 2015;7:55-64. |
||||
|
||||
14.
Sano H. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin
bonds. J Dent Res. 2006;85:11-4. |
||||
|
||||
15.
Spreafico R, Marchesi G, Turco G, Frassetto A, Di Lenarda R, Mazzoni A, et
al. Evaluation of the in vitro effects of cervical marginal relocation using
composite resins on the marginal quality of CAD/CAM crowns. J Adhes Dent.
2016;18:355-62. |
||||
|
||||
16.
Müller V, Friedl KH, Friedl K, Hahnel S, Handel G, Lang R. Influence of
proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted
Cerec inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:607-612. |
||||
|
||||
17.
Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira EC. Efficacy of direct restorative
materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture
resistance of molars restored with cad/cam onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:52-61. |
||||
|
||||
18.
Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. No correlation between two methodological
approaches applied to evaluate cervical margin relocation. Dent Mater J.
2020;39:624-32. |
||||
|
||||
19.
Da Silva Gonçalves D, Cura M, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of proximal
box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays. Clin Oral Investig.
2017;21:247-54. |
||||
|
||||
20.
Köken S, Juloski J, Sorrentino R, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Marginal sealing of
relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays. J Oral Sci.
2018;60:460-8. |
||||
|
||||
21.
Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G LA. Field emission SEM
comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. Biomed
Mater Res. 1995;29:1111-20. |
||||
|
||||
22.
El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K, Habib N. Gingival
microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
Oper Dent. 2007;32:298-305. |
||||
|
||||
23.
Duarte S, de Freitas CRB, Saad JRC, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin
sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and
self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:1-9. |
||||
|
||||
24.
Araujo FO, Vieira LCC, Monteiro S. Influence of resin composite shade and
location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior
restorations. Oper Dent. 2006;31:556-61. |
||||
|
||||
25.
Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Influence of location of the gingival margin on
the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract.
2008;9:65-72. |
||||
|
||||
26.
Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class
II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of
different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2013;18:793-8. |
||||
|
||||
27.
Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Ceballos L. Long-term In Vitro Adhesion of
Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:305-16. |
||||
|
||||
28.
Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effects of dentin
characteristics on interfacial nanoleakage. J Dent Res. 2007;86:1001-6. |
||||
|
||||
29.
Kasaz AC, Pena CE, De Alexandre RS, Viotti RG, Santana VB, Arrais CAG, et al.
Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and
nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and
conventional resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:251-63. |
||||
|
||||
30.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent
Assoc. 2003;69:726-31. |
||||
|
||||
31.
Sauro S, Pashley DH, Mannocci F, Tay FR, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, et al.
Micropermeability of current self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives bonded
to deep dentine: A comparison study using a double-staining/confocal
microscopy technique. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:184-93. |
||||
|
||||
32.
Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and
procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity
preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10:392-413. |
||||
|
||||
33.
de Mattos Pimenta Vidal C, Pavan S, Briso ALF, Bedran-Russo AK. Effects of
three restorative techniques in the bond strength and nanoleakage at gingival
wall of Class II restorations subjected to simulated aging. Clin Oral
Investig. 2013;17:627-33. |
||||
|
||||
34.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek
B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of
current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864-81. |
||||
|
||||
35.
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Ferreira MM, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP
based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive
stability-A systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:1-18. |
||||
|
||||
36.
Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive - A review. Rev Port Estomatol
Med Dent e Cir Maxilofac. 2014;55:194-206. |
||||
|
||||
37.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek
B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and
without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010;26:1176-84. |
||||
|
||||
38.
Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives
Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430-44. |
||||
|
||||
39.
Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, et al. Adhesion of
indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching
resin cements. Oper Dent. 2012;37:474-84. |
||||