Da Silva D, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of the adhesive strategy in the sealing ability of resin composite inlays after deep margin elevation. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(9):e886-93.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.58689

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58689

___________

 

References

1. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010;5:50-76.

 

2. Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Joda T, Discepoli N. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018;69:70-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.008
PMid:29061380

 

3. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118-32.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
PMid:15668328

 

4. Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FHO, De Lima AF, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Evaluation of dentin hardness and bond strength at different walls of class II preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:183-8.

 

5. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26:100-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
PMid:20006379

 

6. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical conceps for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10:47-54.

 

7. Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep Margin Elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2:86-96.

 

8. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent. 2012;40:1068-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.019
PMid:22960537

 

9. Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:317-24.
https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.680905
PMid:23004362

 

10. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1021-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1325-z
PMid:25248949

 

11. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2000;16:48-56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00085-8

 

12. Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Vanloy A, Declerck D, Lambrechts P, Peumans M, et al. Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:683-91.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02894-0
PMid:31123872

 

13. Naga AA El, Yousef M, Ramadan R, Bahgat SF, Alshawwa L. Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;7:55-64.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S80462
PMid:25848318 PMCid:PMC4383219

 

14. Sano H. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent Res. 2006;85:11-4.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500102
PMid:16373674

 

15. Spreafico R, Marchesi G, Turco G, Frassetto A, Di Lenarda R, Mazzoni A, et al. Evaluation of the in vitro effects of cervical marginal relocation using composite resins on the marginal quality of CAD/CAM crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18:355-62.

 

16. Müller V, Friedl KH, Friedl K, Hahnel S, Handel G, Lang R. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:607-612.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1927-8
PMid:27507168

 

17. Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira EC. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with cad/cam onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:52-61.
https://doi.org/10.2341/18-098-L
PMid:31084532

 

18. Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. No correlation between two methodological approaches applied to evaluate cervical margin relocation. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:624-32.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-410
PMid:32295986

 

19. Da Silva Gonçalves D, Cura M, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:247-54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1782-7
PMid:26969499

 

20. Köken S, Juloski J, Sorrentino R, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays. J Oral Sci. 2018;60:460-8.
https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0331
PMid:29695671

 

21. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G LA. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1111-20.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290911
PMid:8567709

 

22. El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K, Habib N. Gingival microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts. Oper Dent. 2007;32:298-305.
https://doi.org/10.2341/06-86
PMid:17555183

 

23. Duarte S, de Freitas CRB, Saad JRC, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0

 

24. Araujo FO, Vieira LCC, Monteiro S. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 2006;31:556-61.
https://doi.org/10.2341/05-94
PMid:17024943

 

25. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:65-72.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-9-7-65
PMid:18997918

 

26. Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:793-8.
https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18344
PMid:23722121 PMCid:PMC3790654

 

27. Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Ceballos L. Long-term In Vitro Adhesion of Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:305-16.

 

28. Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effects of dentin characteristics on interfacial nanoleakage. J Dent Res. 2007;86:1001-6.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708601016
PMid:17890679

 

29. Kasaz AC, Pena CE, De Alexandre RS, Viotti RG, Santana VB, Arrais CAG, et al. Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:251-63.

 

30. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:726-31.

 

31. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Mannocci F, Tay FR, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, et al. Micropermeability of current self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives bonded to deep dentine: A comparison study using a double-staining/confocal microscopy technique. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:184-93.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00518.x
PMid:18353014

 

32. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10:392-413.

 

33. de Mattos Pimenta Vidal C, Pavan S, Briso ALF, Bedran-Russo AK. Effects of three restorative techniques in the bond strength and nanoleakage at gingival wall of Class II restorations subjected to simulated aging. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:627-33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0748-7
PMid:22576325

 

34. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
PMid:16009415

 

35. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Ferreira MM, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-A systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:1-18.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050790
PMid:30866488 PMCid:PMC6427605

 

36. Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive - A review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent e Cir Maxilofac. 2014;55:194-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004

 

37. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010;26:1176-84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.190
PMid:20947155

 

38. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00104-4

 

39. Inukai T, Abe T, Ito Y, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Watson TF, et al. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements. Oper Dent. 2012;37:474-84.
https://doi.org/10.2341/11-081
PMid:22360367