Igai F, Junior WS, Iegami CM, Neto PT. Assessment of different types of intra oral scanners and 3D printers on the accuracy of printed models: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(12):e1174-81.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.58765

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58765

___________

 

References

1. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:308-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
PMid:22920696

 

2. Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145:108-115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011
PMid:24373661

 

3. Eftekhar Ashtiani R, Nasiri Khanlar L, Mahshid M, Moshaverinia A. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of conventionally and digitally manufactured intracoronal restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:233-238.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.014
PMid:28578984

 

4. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219:521-529.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
PMid:26657435

 

5. Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Prosthodontics: Where Do We Currently Stand? A Critical Review. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:474-484.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5079
PMid:28750105

 

6. Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59:236-242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.06.002
PMid:26211702

 

7. Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, Bumann A. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int. 2017;48:41-50.

PMid:27834416

 

8. Anh JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim M, Kim M. A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46:3-12.
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.3
PMid:26877977 PMCid:PMC4751299

 

9. Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:343-349.

PMid:26824085

 

10. Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:36-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
PMid:28024822

 

11. Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:225-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002
PMid:28689906

 

12. Murugesan K, Anandapandian PA, Sharma SK, Vasantha Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of dimension and surface detail accuracy of models produced by three different rapid prototype techniques. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012;12:16-20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0103-8
PMid:23449946 PMCid:PMC3332309

 

13. Ide Y, Nayar S, Logan H, Gallagher B, Wolfaardt J. The effect of the angle of acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications. Odontology. 2017;105:108-115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0239-4
PMid:26995273

 

14. Park ME, Shin SY. Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:861-867.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.020
PMid:29475753

 

15. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int. 2015;46:9-17.

PMid:25019118

 

16. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:465-72.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12567
PMid:25682892

 

17. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:755-759.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
PMid:26794703

 

18. Wan Hassan WN, Yusoff Y, Mardi NA. Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:209-218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.019
PMid:28024776

 

19. Rhee YK, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7:460-467.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.460
PMid:26816576 PMCid:PMC4722150

 

20. Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:1495-1504.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y
PMid:26547869

 

21. Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos Vilella O, Breuning H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:1178-1187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.012
PMid:28554463

 

22. Ishida Y, Miyasaka T. Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns created by 3D printers. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:250-256.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-278
PMid:27041015

 

23. Passent E, Fahad AH, Maha ET, Cherif M. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;S0022-3913(20)30623-5. Ahead of print.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.039
PMid:33308856

 

24. Suryajaya W, Purbiati M , Ismah N. Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis. F1000Res. 2021;10:180.
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.31865.1
PMid:33968366 PMCid:PMC8078212

 

25. Alhouri N, McCord JF, Smith PW. The quality of dental casts used in crown and bridgework. Br Dent J. 2004;197:261-264; discussion 49.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811621
PMid:15359325

 

26. Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:362-367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.018
PMid:27061628

 

27. International Organisation for Standadization. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurements Methods and Results. General principles and definitions. Part 1 (ISO 5725-2:1994)

 

28. Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Rafie KE, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Accuracy os printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions. A comparartive in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:835-842.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13297
PMid:29926977

 

29. Choi JW, Ahn JJ, Son K, Huh JB. Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D printed Photopolymer Models. Materials (basel). 2019;12:3499-3509.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213499
PMid:31731447 PMCid:PMC6862028

 

30. Arnold C, Monsees D, Hey J, Schweyen R. Surface Quality of 3D-Printed Models as a Function of Various Printing Parameters. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121970
PMid:31248083 PMCid:PMC6631072

 

31. Park JM, Jeon J, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;S0022-3913(20)30418-2. Ahead of print.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.008
PMid:32958301

 

32. Im CH, Park JM, Kim JH, Kang YJ, Kim JH. Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:4419.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194419
PMid:33020417 PMCid:PMC7579436