Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, Naim S, Mehanna C. In-vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive dental composite material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(1):e55-63.

doi:10.4317/jced.58966

___________

References

1. Fluoride release and re-release from various esthetic restorative materials - PubMed [Internet]. [cité 17 août 2021]. Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29178714/

2. Manuja N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Nagpal R. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29:7‑13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.79913 PMid:21521911

3. Microshear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials to Dentin [Internet]. [cité 17 août 2021]. Disponible sur: http://www.sciepub.com/abstract/abstract.aspx?id=IJDSR&num=9135

4. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Pashley D, Mutluay MM. Long-Term Durability of Dental Adhesives. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015;2:174‑81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-015-0070-y

5. Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin. Oper Dent. 2010;35:50‑7. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-051-L PMid:20166411

6. Owens BM, Phebus JG, Johnson WW. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of a bioactive restorative material. Gen Dent. 2018;66:32‑6.

7. Perdigao J, Swift E, W R. Fundamental Concepts of Enamel and Dentin Adhesion. In 2013. p. 114‑40.

8. Baig MS, Fleming GJP. Conventional glass-ionomer materials: A review of the developments in glass powder, polyacid liquid and the strategies of reinforcement. J Dent. 2015;43:897‑912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.004 PMid:25882584

9. Almuammar MF, Schulman A, Salama FS. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;25:221‑5. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.25.3.r8g48vn51l46421m PMid:12049082

10. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, et al. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent Mater J. 2010;29:193‑8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-050 PMid:20379030

11. Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials. 1998;19:485‑94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00128-2

12. Ilie N. Maturation of restorative glass ionomers with simplified application procedure. J Dent. 2018;79:46‑52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.008 PMid:30268715

13. Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Cakir FY, Gurgan S. Mechanical performance of a newly developed glass hybrid restorative in the restoration of large MO Class 2 cavities. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:833‑41. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_628_18 PMid:31187770

14. Brzović-Rajić V, Miletić I, Gurgan S, Peroš K, Verzak Ž, Ivanišević-Malčić A. Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52:307‑13. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/4/4 PMid:30666061 PMCid:PMC6336447

15. Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations \| Vesna Miletic \| Springer [Internet]. [cité 8 avr 2021]. Disponible sur: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319609607

16. Milosevic M. Polymerization Mechanics of Dental Composites - Advantages and Disadvantages. Procedia Eng. 2016;8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.672

17. Koç-Vural U, Kerimova L, Baltacioglu İH, Kiremitçi A. Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e437‑42. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53501 PMid:28298988 PMCid:PMC5347295

18. Suzuki S, Ori T, Saimi Y. Effects of filler composition on flexibility of microfilled resin composite. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;74:547‑52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30235 PMid:15747381

19. Shrinkage in composites: An enigma Malarvizhi D, Karthick A, Gold Pearlin Mary N, Venkatesh A - J Int Oral Health [Internet]. [cité 17 août 2021]. Disponible sur: https://www.jioh.org/article.asp?issn=0976-7428;year=2019;volume=11;issue=5;spage=244;epage=248;aulast=Malarvizhi https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_36_19

20. Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Weiss EI, Domb AJ. Chapter 3 - Antimicrobial Nanoparticles in Restorative Composites. In: Subramani K, Ahmed W, éditeurs. Emerging Nanotechnologies in Dentistry [Internet]. Boston: William Andrew Publishing; 2012 [cité 17 août 2021]. p. 35‑47. (Micro and Nano Technologies). Disponible sur: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781455778621000031 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-7862-1.00003-1

21. Tarle Z, Par M. Bioactive dental composite materials. Rad Hrvat Akad Znan Umjet Med Znan. 2018;533:83‑99. https://doi.org/10.21857/mnlqgc02ky

22. Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Bioactive dental restorative materials: a review. Am J Dent. 2013;26:219‑27.

23. Jefferies S. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part II. J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent Al. 2014;26:27‑39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12066 PMid:24341442

24. Alrahlah A. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:13‑9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2205 PMid:29358529

25. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dent Mater. 2019;35:335‑43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.027 PMid:30527586

26. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Bulk Fill Restoratives: A Randomized Controlled Trial - PubMed [Internet]. [cité 17 août 2021]. Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30596045/

27. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers - PubMed [Internet]. [cité 17 août 2021]. Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26054188/

28. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal microleakage properties of activa bioactive restorative and nanohybrid composite resin using two different adhesives in non carious cervical lesions - an in vitro study. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017;7:1‑14.

29. Porenczuk A, Jankiewicz B, Naurecka M, Bartosewicz B, Sierakowski B, Gozdowski D, et al. A comparison of the remineralizing potential of dental restorative materials by analyzing their fluoride release profiles. Adv Clin Exp Med Off Organ Wroclaw Med Univ. 2019;28:815-823. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/94140 PMid:30740943

30. Gupta S, Vellanki VK, Shetty VK, Kushwah S, Goyal G, Chandra SMS. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of nanocomposites to dentin. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2015;9:ZC09-11. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11463.5386 PMid:25738077 PMCid:PMC4347168

31. Bhadra D, Shah NC, Rao AS, Dedania MS, Bajpai N. A 1-year comparative evaluation of clinical performance of nanohybrid composite with ActivaTM bioactive composite in Class II carious lesion: A randomized control study. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2019;22:92‑6.

32. Papakonstantinou AE, Eliades T, Cellesi F, Watts DC, Silikas N. Evaluation of UDMA's potential as a substitute for Bis-GMA in orthodontic adhesives. Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2013;29:898‑905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.007 PMid:23787036

33. Abd El Halim S. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a bioactive composite and nano-composite: an in vitro study. Egypt Dent J. 2018;64:1653‑9. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.78402

34. Latta MA, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW. Enamel and Dentin Bond Durability of Self-Adhesive Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:99‑105.

35. Benetti AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6:90‑8. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202 PMid:31998876 PMCid:PMC6964780

36. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal J-P, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci [Internet]. 2021 [cité 25 mars 2021]; Disponible sur: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/josnusd/advpub/0/advpub_20-0448/_article

37. Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Siboni F, Modena E, De Stefano ED, Prati C. Biomimetic remineralization of human dentin using promising innovative calcium-silicate hybrid « smart » materials. Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater. 2011;27:1055‑69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.007 PMid:21840044

38. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Kavrik F, Yasa B, Botsali MS. Fluoride release/recharging ability and bond strength of glass ionomer cements to sound and caries-affected dentin. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20:226. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.178917 PMid:28091442

39. Lezaja Zebic M, Jakovljevic N, Miletic V. Fluoride release from conventional, resin-modified and hybrid glass ionomer cements. Serbian Dent J. 2018;65:187‑94. https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0018

40. Tiskaya M, Al-eesa NA, Wong FSL, Hill RG. Characterization of the bioactivity of two commercial composites. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1757‑68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.004 PMid:31699444

41. Hokii Y, Carey C, Heiss M, Joshi G. Fluoride ion release/recharge behavior of ion-releasing restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2019;35:e17‑8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.035

42. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:293‑300. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-161 PMid:29279547

43. May E, Donly KJ. Fluoride release and re-release from a bioactive restorative material. Am J Dent. 2017;30:305‑8.

44. El Mallakh BF, Sarkar NK. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 1990;6:118‑22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80041-7