Rivero-Millán P, Barrera-Mora JM, Espinar-Escalona E, González-del Pino CA, Martín-Salvador D, Llamas-Carreras JM. Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2 and Class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(12):e1216-26.

doi:10.4317/jced.58970

___________

References

1. Pordes F. Roentgenography of the Mandibulo-Temporal Articulation From Direct Frontal Direction. Dent Cosm. 1916;58:1426.

2. Updegrave WJ. An Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Roentgenography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1953;46(4):408-19. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1953.0064 PMid:13034401

3. Linblom G. Technique for roentgen-photographic registration of the different condyle positions in the temporomandibular joint. Dent Cosm. 1936;78:1227-35.

4. B. Holly Broadbent. A new X-Ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:45-66.

5. Gillis R. Roentgen Ray Study of the Temporomandibular Articulation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1935;22:1321-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1935.0245

6. Reisner SE. Temporomandibular reactions to Occlusal Anomalies. J Am Dent Assoc. 1938;24:1938-53. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1938.0340

7. Brader AC. The application of the prinicples of cephalometric laminagraphy to studies of the frontal planes of the human head. Am J Orthod. 1949;35:249-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(49)90039-1

8. Ricketts RM. Various conditions of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Angle Orthod. 1952;22:98-115.

9. Ricketts RM. A study of changes in temporomandibular joint, relations associate with the treatment of class II malocclusion (Angle). Am J Orthod. 1952;38:918-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(52)90067-5

10. Ricketts RM. Variations of the Temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Am J Orthod. 1950;36:877-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(50)90055-8

11. Arieta-Miranda JM, Silva-Valencia M, Flores-Mir C, Paredes-Sampen NA, Arriola-Guillen LE. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-36 PMid:24325842 PMCid:PMC4384926

12. Scarfe W, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman A. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J. 2017;62:33-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12479 PMid:28297089

13. Lee TY, Kim KH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Jung YS, Baik HS. Correlation analysis of three-dimensional changes of hard and soft tissues in class III orthognathic surgery patients using cone-beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1530-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000620 PMid:25006925

14. Sahin O, Kalabalik F, Tatar B, Odabasi O. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Styloid Process in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders and Asymptomatic Individuals. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:2236-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005979 PMid:31490445

15. Paesani D, Salas E, Martinez A, Isberg A. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disk displacement in infants and young children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 1999;87:15-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70288-X

16. Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Lee DY, Nahm DS. Evaluation of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint by panoramic radiographs compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:479-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.009 PMid:16627173

17. Tasaki MM, Westesson PL, Isberg AM, Ren YF, Tallents RH. Classification and prevalence of temporomandibular joint disk displacement in patients and symptom-free volunteers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:249-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70148-8

18. Sutton DI, Sadowsky PL, Bernreuter WK, McCutcheon MJ, Lakshminarayanan AV. Temporomandibular joint sounds and condyle/disk relations on magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:70-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70084-N

19. Imanimoghaddam M, Madani AS, Mahdavi P, Bagherpour A, Darijani M, Ebrahimnejad H. Evaluation of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2016;46:127-31. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.127 PMid:27358820 PMCid:PMC4925649

20. Thompson John R. Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:143-63. PMid:3458399

21. Thompson John R. Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature Part II. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:181-92. PMid:3461729

22. Lindblom, G. Disorders of the temporomandibular joint, causal factors and the value of temporomandibular radiographs in their diagnosis and therapy. Acta Odontol Scand. 1953;11:61. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355308997701 PMid:13079722

23. Rokni A, Ismail YH. Radiographic comparative study of condylar position in centric relation and centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90035-0 PMid:6928201

24. Weinberg LA. Role of condylar position in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:636-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90062-3 PMid:286056

25. Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, Petersson A. A tomographic study of mandibular condyle position in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:706-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90029-0 PMid:3858537

26. Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Guichet D. Tomographic analysis of mandibular condyle position in diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:723-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90450-6 PMid:3459874

27. Cholasueksa P, Warita H, Soma K. Alterations of the Rat Temporomandibular Joint in Functional Posterior Displacement of the Mandible. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:7. PMid:15529504

28. Incesu L, Taşkaya-Yılmaz N, Öğütcen-Toller M, Uzun E. Relationship of condylar position to disc position and morphology. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:269-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00218-3 PMid:15294336

29. Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RWF. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class I malocclusion patients: Condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:192-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.032 PMid:19651348

30. Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RWF. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: Condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.033 PMid:19651349

31. Pita Fernández, S, Pértegas Díaz, S. La fiabilidad de las mediciones clínicas: el análisis de la concordancia para variables numéricas. https://www.fisterra.com/mbe/investiga/conc_numerica. 12 Jan 2004.

32. Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62:719-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90270-7 PMid:3467295

33. Song J, Cheng M, Qian Y, Chu F. Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle's classification. Oral Radiol. 2019;36:261-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00403-3 PMid:31385140

34. Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients. Stomatologija. 2009;11:32-6. PMid:19423969

35. Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between Occlusal Force and Mandibular Condyle Morphology: Evaluated by Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:1063-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/120908-620R.1 PMid:19852595

36. Rui-yong Wang, Ma XC, Zhang WL, Liu DG. Investigation of temporomandibular joint space of healthy adults by using cone beam computed tomography. J Peking Univ Health Sci. 2007;39:503-6. PMid:17940569

37. Vitral RWF, da Silva Campos MJ, Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR. Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: Is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2011;140:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.030 PMid:21724082

38. Ganugapanta VR. Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:29-33. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/21678.9328 PMid:28384976 PMCid:PMC5376766

39. Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: A morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2005;128:337-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.024 PMid:16168330

40. Zhou D, Hu M, Liang D, Zhao G, Liu A. Relationship between fossa-condylar position, meniscus position, and morphologic change in patients with Class II and III malocclusion. Chin J Dent Res. 1999;2:45-9. PMid:10557183

41. Gianelly AA, Petras JC, Boffa J. Condylar position and Class II deep-bite, no-overjet malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90328-4 PMid:2816843

42. Merigue LF, Conti AC de CF, Oltramari-Navarro PVP, Navarro R de L, Almeida MR de. Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0017 PMid:26981751

43. Uzel A, Özyürek Y, Öztunç H. Condyle position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion patients: Correlation between MPI records and CBCT images. J World Fed Orthod. 2013;2:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2013.03.002

44. Cohlmia Jeff T, Grosh Joydeep, Nanda Ram S. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:27-36. PMid:8678342

45. Kaur A, Natt AS, Mehra SK, Maheshwari K, Kaur A. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17:679-86. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1912 PMid:27659088