Saeed TA, Alansy AS, Abdu ZA, Almaqtari O, Yu Z. Dentulous versus edentulous mandibles: CBCT-based morphometric assessment of mandibular canal and alveolar bone. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(12):e986-93.

doi:10.4317/jced.59033

___________

References

1. Cartes G, Garay I, Deana NF, Navarro P, Alves N. Mandibular canal course and the position of the mental foramen by panoramic X-ray in Chilean individuals. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2709401. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2709401 PMid:29984228 PMCid:PMC6011159

2. de Souza LA, Souza Picorelli Assis NM, Ribeiro RA, Pires Carvalho AC, Devito KL. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery. Ann Anat. 2016;205:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.01.006 PMid:26851559

3. Arias A, Venegas C, Soto N, Montiel I, Farfán C, Navarro P, et al. Location and course of the mandibular canal in dentate patients: morphometric study using cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol. 2019;79:563-9. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0103 PMid:31565789

4. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Kuchler U, Buser D. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 2--analysis of edentulous sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:639-47. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1895 PMid:25171034

5. Pramstraller M, Schincaglia GP, Vecchiatini R, Farina R, Trombelli L. Alveolar ridge dimensions in mandibular posterior regions: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:1419-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2095-0 PMid:30167819

6. Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, McClanahan SB, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Mandibular canal location: Cone-beam computed tomography examination. J Endod. 2016;42:1018-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.004 PMid:27178249

7. Nimigean V, Sirbu VD, Nimigean VR, Bădiţă DG, Poll A, Moraru SA, et al. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in edentate subjects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018;59:235-42. PMid:29940633

8. Komal A, Bedi RS, Wadhwani P, Aurora JK, Chauhan H. Study of normal anatomy of mandibular canal and its variations in Indian population using CBCT. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19:98-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01224-x PMid:31988571 PMCid:PMC6954929

9. Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza ALÁ, Dezzoti MSG, Fischer CM, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19:240-3. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000300011 PMid:21625740 PMCid:PMC4234336

10. Bressan E, Ferrarese N, Pramstraller M, Lops D, Farina R, Tomasi C. Ridge dimensions of the edentulous mandible in posterior sextants: An observational study on cone beam computed tomography radiographs. Implant Dent. 2017;26:66-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000489 PMid:27824716

11. Reich KM, Huber CD, Lippnig WR, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tangl S. Atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in an historical population. Oral Dis. 2011;17:33-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01699.x PMid:20604872

12. Canger EM, Celenk P. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge heights of dentate and edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2012;29:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00391.x PMid:20545771

13. Yüzügüllü B, Gulsahi A, Imirzalioglu P. Radiomorphometric indices and their relation to alveolar bone loss in completely edentulous Turkish patients: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:160-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60021-4 PMid:19231567

14. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects. J Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54:379-83. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359609003555 PMid:8997437

15. Simonton JD, Azevedo B, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. Age- and gender-related differences in the position of the inferior alveolar nerve by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:944-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.032 PMid:19567312

16. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155-9. PMid:19344041

17. Direk F, Uysal, II, Kivrak AS, Unver Dogan N, Fazliogullari Z, Karabulut AK. Reevaluation of mandibular morphometry according to age, gender, and side. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:1054-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004293 PMid:29461369

18. Gerlach NL, Ghaeminia H, Bronkhorst EM, Bergé SJ, Meijer GJ, Maal TJJ. Accuracy of assessing the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: A validation study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:666-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.030 PMid:24480773

19. Al-Shayyab MH, Qabba'ah K, Alsoleihat F, Baqain ZH. Age and gender variations in the cone-beam computed tomographic location of mandibular canal: Implications for mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24:545-54. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22969 PMid:31232390 PMCid:PMC6667004

20. Sîrbu VD, Perlea P, Nimigean VR, Bădiţă DG, Şerban A, Nimigean V. Morphological assessment of the mandibular canal trajectory in dentate subjects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58:1401-8. PMid:29556634

21. Promma L, Sakulsak N, Putiwat P, Amarttayakong P, Iamsaard S, Trakulsuk H, et al. Cortical bone thickness of the mandibular canal and implications for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a cadaveric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:572-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.008 PMid:28089388

22. Angel JS, Mincer HH, Chaudhry J, Scarbecz MJJofs. Cone-beam computed tomography for analyzing variations in inferior alveolar canal location in adults in relation to age and sex. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:216-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01508.x PMid:20666920

23. Ulm C, Solar P, Blahout R, Matejka M, Watzek G, Gruber H. Location of the mandibular canal within the atrophic mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;31:370-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(93)90193-Z PMid:8286291

24. Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, Choi HY, Lee SR, Oh SH, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:53-60. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53 PMid:24701459 PMCid:PMC3972406

25. Zhang YQ, Zhao YN, Liu DG, Meng Y, Ma XC. Bifid variations of the mandibular canal: cone beam computed tomography evaluation of 1000 Northern Chinese patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126:e271-e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.06.008 PMid:30093317

26. Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33:501-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0761-y PMid:21161224

27. Zhou X, Gao X, Zhang J. Bifid mandibular canals: CBCT assessment and macroscopic observation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42:1073-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02489-5 PMid:32399625

28. Sato I, Ueno R, Kawai T, Yosue T. Rare courses of the mandibular canal in the molar regions of the human mandible: a cadaveric study. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2005;82:95-102. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj.82.95 PMid:16350422

29. Güler A, Sumer M, Sumer P, Biçer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:741-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x PMid:16159352