Ranjkesh B, Haddadi Y, Krogsgaard CA, Schurmann A, Bahrami G. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with single or bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(4):e329-33.

doi:10.4317/jced.59373

___________

References

1. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dental clinics of North America. 1976;20:299-311. PMid:1062314

2. Ibrahim AM, Richards LC, Berekally TL. Effect of remaining tooth structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:290-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.013 PMid:26548871

3. Bhagat A, Mittal L, Mogla S, Kaur T, Dheeraj M, Marwah G. Impact of Root Dentin Thickness on the in vitro Compressive Strength of Teeth treated with Recent Post and Core Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18:1065-70. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2177 PMid:29109323

4. Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a prospective study. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37:1512-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.002 PMid:22000453

5. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3 PMid:8040817

6. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2667-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 PMid:12059016

7. Valdivia AD, Raposo LH, Simamoto-Junior PC, Novais VR, Soares CJ. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108:147-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60138-3 PMid:22944310

8. Mangold JT, Kern M. Influence of glass-fiber posts on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with varying substance loss: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011;105:387-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60080-2 PMid:21640240

9. Samran A, El Bahra S, Kern M. The influence of substance loss and ferrule height on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. An in vitro study. Dental Materials. 2013;29:1280-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.003 PMid:24182949

10. Sherfudhin H, Hobeich J, Carvalho CA, Aboushelib MN, Sadig W, Salameh Z. Effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically ceramic crowns. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2011;19:28-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100007 PMid:21437466 PMCid:PMC4245860

11. Durmuş G, Oyar P. Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: A finite element analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112:547-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.006 PMid:24630398

12. Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Operative dentistry. 2003;28:86-91. PMid:12540124

13. Lazari PC, Oliveira RC, Anchieta RB, Almeida EO, Freitas Junior AC, Kina S, et al. Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:511-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130203 PMid:24473716 PMCid:PMC3891274

14. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. American journal of dentistry. 2000;13:255-60. PMid:11764112

15. Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y, Zhang W. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.008 PMid:17341377

16. Maceri F, Martignoni M, Vairo G. Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: a finite-element approach. J Biomech. 2007;40:2386-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.018 PMid:17254588

17. Meyenberg K. The ideal restoration of endodontically treated teeth - structural and esthetic considerations: a review of the literature and clinical guidelines for the restorative clinician. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8:238-68. PMid:23712344

18. Manning KE, Yu DC, Yu HC, Kwan EW. Factors to consider for predictable post and core build-ups of endodontically treated teeth. Part I: Basic theoretical concepts. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61:685-8,90,93-5. PMid:7553400

19. Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. American journal of dentistry. 2001;14:286-90. PMid:11803991

20. Kul E, Yanıkoğlu N, Yeşildal Yeter K, Bayındır F, Sakarya RE. A comparison of the fracture resistance of premolars without a ferrule with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:523.e1-.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.018 PMid:31753456

21. Hegde V, Arora N. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Three Different Esthetic Post Systems. J Oper Dent Endod. 2019;4:10-3. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0066 PMid:26381631

22. Wandscher VF, Bergoli CD, Limberger IF, Ardenghi TM, Valandro LF. Preliminary results of the survival and fracture load of roots restored with intracanal posts: weakened vs nonweakened roots. Operative dentistry. 2014;39:541-55. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-465 PMid:24502753

23. Meira JB, Esposito CO, Quitero MF, Poiate IA, Pfeifer CS, Tanaka CB, et al. Elastic modulus of posts and the risk of root fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25:394-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00772.x PMid:19459921