Ghazal-Maghras
R, Vilaplana-Vivo J, Camacho-Alonso F, Martínez-Beneyto Y. Properties of
polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: A systematic review. J Clin
Exp Dent. 2022;14(4):e349-58.
doi:10.4317/jced.59466
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59466
___________
References
1.
Brånemark P, Hansson B, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, et al.
Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience
from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1977;11:1-32. PMid:356184 |
|
|
|
2.
Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J
Mol Sci. 2014;15:5426-45. |
|
|
|
3.
Wiesli MG, Ozcan M. High-Performance Polymers and Their Potential Application
as Medical and Oral Implant Materials: A Review. Implant Dent. 2015;24:448-57. |
|
|
|
4.
Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative
to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2009;20:32-47. |
|
|
|
5.
Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of a modified polyether-ether-ketone
(PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses.
A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:580-4. |
|
|
|
6.
Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al.
Polyetheretherketoneda suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J
Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:1209-16. |
|
|
|
7.
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of
polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J
Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:12-9. |
|
|
|
8.
Silthamitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H,
Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to
PEEK. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:668-74. |
|
|
|
9.
Altmeyer J, Dos Santos JF, Amancio-Filho ST. Effect of the friction riveting
process parameters on the joint formation and performance of Ti
alloy/short-fibre reinforced polyether ether ketone joints. Mater Design.
2014;60:164-176. |
|
|
|
10.
Green S, Schlegel J. A polyaryletherketone biomaterial for use in medical
implant applications. Polym for the Med Ind Pro. 2001;14-5. |
|
|
|
11.
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal
implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69. |
|
|
|
12.
Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W. Flexural behavior of PEEK
materials for dental application. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1377-84. |
|
|
|
13.
Schwitalla AD, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W. Fatigue limits
of different PEEK materials for dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
2017;69:163-8. |
|
|
|
14.
Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for
medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27:118. |
|
|
|
15.
Lee W, Koak J, Lim Y, Kim S, Kwon H, Kim M. Stress shielding and fatigue
limits of polyetheretherketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl
Biomater. 2012;100:1044-52. |
|
|
|
16.
Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M,Pontes AE, Piattelli A. The effect of material
characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and
connections on sof t tissue integration: A literature review. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2006;17:55-67. |
|
|
|
17.
Canullo L, Annunziata M, Pesce P, Tommasato G, Nastri L, Guida L. Influence
of abutment material and modifications on peri-implant soft-tissue
attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of histological animal studies.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:426-436. |
|
|
|
18.
Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Optical properties and surface roughness of
prepolymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J Prosthet
Dent. 2019;121:347-52. |
|
|
|
19.
D'Ercole S, Cellini L, Pilato S, Di Lodovico S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Petrini
M. Material characterization and Streptococcus oralis adhesion on
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology. J Mater
Sci Mater Med. 2020;31:84. |
|
|
|
20.
Gittens RA, Scheideler L, Rupp F, Hyzy SL, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schwartz Z, et
al. A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and
clinical aspects. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2907-2918. |
|
|
|
21.
Sartoretto SC, Alves ATNN, Resende RFB, Calasans-Maia J, Granjeiro JM,
Calasans-Maia MD. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and
wettability of dental implants. J. Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23:279-297. |
|
|
|
22.
Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant
osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons
for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;108:3363-71. |
|
|
|
23.
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal
implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69. |
|
|
|
24.
Gheisarifar M, Thompson GA, Drago C, Tabatabaei F, Rasoulianboroujeni M. In
vitro study of surface alterations to polyetheretherketone and titanium and
their effect upon human gingival fibroblasts. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:155-164. |
|
|
|
25.
Yuan B, Cheng QW, Zhao R, Zhu XD, Yang X, Yang X, et al. Comparison of
osteointegration property between PEKK and PEEK: effects of surface structure
and chemistry. Biomaterials. 2018;170:116-26. |
|
|
|
26.
Qin W, Li Y, Ma J, Liang Q, Cui X, Jia H, Tang B. Osseointegration and
biosafety of graphene oxide wrapped porous CF/PEEK composites as implantable
materials: The role of surface structure and chemistry. Dent Mater. 2020;36:1289-1302. |
|
|
|
27.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med.
2009;151:264-269. |
|
|
|
28.
Faggion CM Jr. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on
dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12:182-9. |
|
|
|
29.
Tretto PHW, Dos Santos MBF, Spazzin AO, Pereira GKR, Bacchi A. Assessment of
stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials
compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element
analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020;23:372-383. |
|
|
|
30.
Al-Zordk W, Elmisery A, Ghazy M. Hybrid-abutment-restoration: effect of
material type on torque maintenance and fracture resistance after thermal
aging. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:24. |
|
|
|
31.
Ortega-Martínez J, Delgado LM, Ortiz-Hernández M, Punset M, Cano-Batalla J,
Cayon MR, et al. In vitro assessment of PEEK and titanium implant abutments:
Screw loosening and microleakage evaluations under dynamic mechanical testing.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:470-476. PMid:33309211 |
|
|
|
32.
Ragupathi M, Mahadevan V, Azhagarasan NS, Ramakrishnan H, Jayakrishnakumar S.
Comparative evaluation of the wear resistance of two different implant
abutment materials after cyclic loading - An in vitro study. Contemp Clin
Dent. 2020;11:229-236. |
|
|
|
33.
Atsü SS, Aksan ME, Bulut AC. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and
CeramicReinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM
Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:622-630 |
|
|
|
34.
Al-Rabab'ah M, Hamadneh W, Alsalem I, Khraisat A, Abu Karaky A. Use of
High-Performance Polymers as Dental Implant Abutment and Frameworks: A Case
Series Report. J Prosthodont. 2019;4:365-372. |
|
|
|
35.
Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Traini T, Di Lorio D, Caputi S. Fracture resistance
of implant-supported screw-versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal
single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis. Dent Mater. 2007;23:296-301 |
|
|
|
36.
Freitas ACJ, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NRF, Marotta LPC. Effect of implant
connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure
modes of anterior crowns. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119:323-330 |
|
|
|
37.
Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant
loads: a methodologic clinical study. Int J. Proshodont. 2002;15:20-27. PMid:11887595 |
|
|
|
38.
Li Xu, Zhu Z, Li Z, Zhou J, Chen W. All-ceramic premolar guiding late retains
resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Stomatol. 2019;37:285-9. PMid:31218863
PMCid:PMC7030086 |
|
|
|
39.
Wachtel A, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Müller W, Schwitalla AD. A novel
approach to prove bacterial leakage of implant-abutment connections in vitro.
J Oral Implantol. 2016;42:452-7. |
|
|
|
40.
Park J, Baek C, Heo S, Kim S, Koak J, Kim S, et al. An in vitro evaluation of
the loosening of different interchangeable abutments in internal-connection
type implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:350-5. |