Ismail HS, Ali AI, Mehesen RE, Garcia-Godoy F, Mahmoud SH. In vitro marginal and internal adaptation of four different base materials used to elevate proximal dentin gingival margins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(7):e550-9.

doi:10.4317/jced.59652

___________

References

1. Zhou X, Huang X, Li M, Peng X, Wang S, Zhou X, et al. Development and status of resin composite as dental restorative materials. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136:48180. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48180

2. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010;5:50-76.

3. Manuja N, Nagpal R, Pandit IK. Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;36:223-34. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.36.3.68805rl1r037m063 PMid:22838222

4. Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:273-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.09.005 PMid:29153552

5. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10:7-54;quiz 56.

6. Lindberg A, van Dijken J, Lindberg M. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Am J Dent. 2003;16:33-6.

7. Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int. 2015;46:751-64.

8. Bresser R, Gerdolle D, van den Heijkant I, Sluiter-Pouwels L, Cune M, Gresnigt M. Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region. J Dent. 2019;91:103227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103227 PMid:31697971

9. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39:643-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.004 PMid:21801799

10. Vertolli TJ, Martinsen B, Hanson C, Howard R, Kooistra S, Ye L. Effect of deep margin elevation on CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:608-17. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-315-L PMid:32243253

11. Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira E. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:52-61. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-098-L PMid:31084532

12. Benetti AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, Van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6:90-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1696202 PMid:31998876 PMCid:PMC6964780

13. Mahmoud SH, Al-Wakeel EES. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:131-9.

14. Francois P, Vennat E, Le Goff S, Ruscassier N, Attal JP, Dursun E. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:2599-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5 PMid:30317399

15. Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Michna A, ArRejaie A, Bader D, El Gezawi M. Cervical interfacial bonding effectiveness of class II bulk versus incremental fill resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2015;40:622-35. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-152-L PMid:26151459

16. Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu BP, et al. Defying ageing: an expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent. 2016;45:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.008 PMid:26655173

17. Ernst C-P, Canbek K, Euler T, Willershausen B. In vivo validation of the historical in vitro thermocycling temperature range for dental materials testing. Clin Oral Investig. 2004;8:130-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-004-0267-2

18. Aggarwal V, Bhasin S. Application of calcium silicate materials after acid etching may preserve resin-dentin bonds. Oper Dent. 2018;43:243-52. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-306-L PMid:29953337

19. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. J Dent. 2014;42:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016 PMid:24631232

20. Perdigão J, Swift Jr EJ. Universal adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:331-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12185 PMid:26767920

21. Zaruba M, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Comparison between different flow application techniques: SDR vs flowable composite. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:115-21.

22. Fabianelli A, Sgarr A, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Pollington S, Ferrari M. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Oper Dent. 2010;35:308-13. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-128-L PMid:20533631

23. Ebaya MM, Ali AI, Mahmoud SH. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of three glass ionomer-based Class V restorations: in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13:599-606. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401435 PMid:31891976 PMCid:PMC6938416

24. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent. 2004;32:109-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008 PMid:14749082

25. Cetin A, Dinc H. Effects of artificial aging on the bond strengths of universal dental adhesives. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23:1148-54. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_435_19 PMid:32788494

26. Ivoclar Vivadent Tetric‑N‑Bond Universal Scientific Documentation. Available from: https://www.ivoclarvivadent.in/en-in/p/all/tetric-n-bond-universal. (Last accessed on 2022 April 22).

27. Czarnecka B, Kruszelnicki A, Kao A, Strykowska M, Nicholson JW. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique. Dent Mater. 2004;30:301-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.008 PMid:24950810

28. Karadas M, Atıcı MG. Bond strength and adaptation of pulp capping materials to dentin. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83:514-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23440 PMid:31912929

29. Münevveroğlu AP, Ozsoy A, Ozcan M. Microleakage of high viscosity glass-ionomer and glass-carbomer with and without coating before and after hydrothermal aging. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2019;22:79-87. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2019.v22i1.1631

30. de Mattos Pimenta Vidal C, Pavan S, Briso ALF, Bedran-Russo AK. Effects of three restorative techniques in the bond strength and nanoleakage at gingival wall of Class II restorations subjected to simulated aging. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:627-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0748-7 PMid:22576325

31. Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent. 2017;67:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012 PMid:28750776

32. Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492 PMid:30083577 PMCid:PMC6070969

33. Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer dental cements: update. Mater Technol. 2010;25:8-13. https://doi.org/10.1179/175355509X12614966220506