Costa EFA,
Penteado MM, Maior BS. Comparative analysis of biomechanical response between
zygomatic implant and Facco technique through the three-dimensional finite
element method. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(2):e96-101.
doi:10.4317/jced.59885
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59885
__________
References
1.
Bassir SH, El Holy K, Chen C, Lee KY, Intini G. Outcome of early dental
implant placement versus Other dental implant placement protocols: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2019;9095:493-506. |
|
|
|
2.
Rosenstein J, Dym H. Zygomatic implants: a solution for the atrophic maxilla:
2021 Update. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65:229-39. |
|
|
|
3.
Brånemark P. Surgery and fixture installation: zygomaticus fixture clinical
procedures (vol. 1). Göteborg: Nobel Biocare, 1998. |
|
|
|
4.
Ruben M, Jose G, Alvaro D, Grace S. Maxillary zygomatic hexagonal implant
system (MZH system) for severe resorption: a new technique. Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2017;21:447-51. |
|
|
|
5.
Agliardi EL, Panigatti S, Romeo D, Sacchi L, Gherlone E. Clinical outcomes
and biological and mechanical complications of immediate fixed prostheses
supported by zygomatic implants: a retrospective analysis from a prospective
clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2021;23:612-24. |
|
|
|
6.
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMDO, Bottino MA, Kleverlaan CJ, Koolstra JH. Mouthguard
use and TMJ injury prevention with different occlusions: A three-dimensional
finite element analysis. Dental traumatology. 2020;36:662. |
|
|
|
7.
Aparicio C. A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patient based on
the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey. Eur J
Oral Implantol. 2011;4:269-75. |
|
|
|
8.
Wu SH, Li Y, Zhang YQ, Li XK, Yuan CF, Hao YL et al. Porous titanium-6
aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion
than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Artificial
organs. 2013;37:E191-E201. |
|
|
|
9.
Campaner LM, Silveira MPM, de Andrade GS, Borges ALS, Bottino MA, Dal Piva
AMDO et al. Influence of polymeric restorative materials on the stress
distribution in posterior fixed partial dentures: 3D finite element analysis.
Polymers. 2021;13:758. |
|
|
|
10.
Ausiello P, Tribst JPM, Ventre M, Salvati E, di Lauro A E, Martorelli M et
al. The role of cortical zone level and prosthetic platform angle in dental
implant mechanical response: A 3D finite element analysis. Dental Materials.
2021;37:1688-97. |
|
|
|
11.
Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage:
an overview for clinicians. The Angle Orthodontist. 1994;64:175-88. PMid:8060014 |
|
|
|
12.
Villefort RF, Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMDO, Borges AL, Binda NC, Ferreira CEDA
et al. Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained
palatal obturator. Plos one. 2020;15:e0241589. |
|
|
|
13.
Akay C, Yalug S. Biomechanical 3-dimensional finit element analysis of
obturador protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary
defects. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:604-11. |
|
|
|
14.
Mousa MA, Abdullah JY, Jamavet NB, Alam MK, Husein A. Biomechanical stress in
obturator prostheses: a systematic review of finite element stydies. Biomed
Res Int. 2021;2021:6419774. PMid:34447852
PMCid:PMC8384539 |
|
|
|
15.
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMDO, Borges ALS. Biomechanical tools to study dental
implants: a literature review. Brazilian Dental Science. 2016;19:5-11. PMid:9509776 |