Alvarez C, Domínguez P, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Arroyo G, Orozco A. How the geometry of the scan body affects the accuracy of digital impressions in implant supported prosthesis. In vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(12):e1008-14.

doi:10.4317/jced.59948

___________

References

1. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fitan in vitro study. Clin Oral Invest. 2012;16:851-56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5 PMid:21647591

2. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 PMid:29627211

3. Revilla-León M, Fogarty R, Barrington JJ, Zandinejad A, Özcan M. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufacured plaster models. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:202-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.011 PMid:31787272

4. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, Seidt J, JohnstonWM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 PMid:31040026

5. Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, et al. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:372-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003 PMid:31864638

6. Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Özcan M, et al. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:575-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.004 PMid:31870612

7. Arakida T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Suzuki T, Minakuchi S. Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:324-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.005 PMid:29397353

8. Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26:101-21. PMid:29989757

9. Kim J, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Shin IH, Kim M. Comparison of experience curves be-tween two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.018 PMid:27061634

10. Schmidt A, Billig JW, Schlenz MA, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanbodies on Implant Position: Differences in Manufacturing Tolerances. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32:430-32. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6371 PMid:31486814

11. Kurz M, Attin T, Mehl A, Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2015;19:2035-43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5 PMid:25743568

12. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2007;28:422-4, 426-8, 430-1. PMid:18578100

13. Chia VA, Esguerra RJ, Teoh KH, Teo JW, Wong KM, Tan KB. In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: the effect of implant angulation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:313-2 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5087 PMid:28231346

14. Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies. An experimental approach. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:34-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12362 PMid:26466158

15. Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falcão C, Lemos BF, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV, et al. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031020 PMid:33498902 PMCid:PMC7908474

16. Lerner H, Nagy K, Luongo F, Luongo G, Admakin O, Mangano FG. Tolerances in the production of six different implant scanbodies: a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont. 2021. Epub 2021 Feb 12. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7379 PMid:33616558

17. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y PMid:24240949

18. Pesce P, Pera F, Setti P, Menini M. Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31:171-5. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5535 PMid:29518813

19. Motel C, Kirchner E, Adler W, Wichmann M, & Matta R E. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Asessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:309-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13131 PMid:31802574