Pereira AG,
Martins CC, Campos JR, Faria SFS, Notaro SQ, Poklepović-Peričić T, Costa LCM,
Costa FO, Cota LOM. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention
studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. J Clin Exp Dent.
2023;15(8):e678-94.
doi:10.4317/jced.60197
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60197
_________
References
|
1.
Cuello-Garcia CA, Morgan RL, Brozek J, Santesso N, Verbeek J, Thayer K, et
al. A scoping review and survey provide the rationale, perceptions, and
preferences for the integration of randomized and nonrandomized studies in
evidence syntheses and GRADE assessments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;98:33-40. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Glenny AM, Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The assessment of
systematic reviews in dentistry. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:85-92. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a
critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or
non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical
research ed.). 2017;358.j4008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al.
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological
quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al.
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:225-234. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Faggion CM Jr, Giannakopoulos NN. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on
the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss. J Clin
Periodontol. 2013;40:542-552. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Elangovan S, Avila-Ortiz G, Johnson GK, Karimbux N, Allareddy V. Quality
assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans. J
Periodontol. 2013;84:176-185. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Hasuike A, Iguchi S, Suzuki D, Kawano E, Sato S. Systematic review and
assessment of systematic reviews examining the effect of periodontal
treatment on glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Med Oral Patol Oral
Cir Bucal. 2017;22:e167-e176. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Natto ZS, Hameedaldain A. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses
and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship Between Periodontal and Systemic
Diseases. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19:131-139. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Hasuike A, Ueno D, Nagashima H, Kubota T, Tsukune N, Watanabe N, et al.
Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of
treatments for peri-implantitis. J Periodontal Res. 2019;54:374-387. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA.
(editors). (Updated February 2021) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews
of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane, Retrieved from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2021;372,71. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al.
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of
interventions. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2016;355:i4919. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Are systematic reviews up-to-date
at the time of publication? Systematic Reviews. 2013;2:36. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D. Systematic
reviews can be produced and published faster. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:531-536. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Andersen MZ, Fonnes S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Most published meta-analyses
were made available within two years of protocol registration. Eur J Integr
Med. 2021;44:101342. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app
for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Pauletto P, Polmann H, Réus JC, Oliveira JMD, Chaves D, Lehmkuhl K, et al.
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry
published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Evid Based Dent. 2022
Sep 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Schellinger J, Sewell K, Bloss JE, Ebron T, Forbes C. The effect of librarian
involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine. PloS One.
2021;16:e0256833. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Aromataris E, Munn Z. (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Joanna
Briggs Institute. 2020. Retrieved from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Saltaji H, Armijo-Olivo S, Cummings GG, Amin M, Flores-Mir C. Randomized
clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors,
reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955-2013. PloS
One. 2017;12:e0190089. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Perry R, Whitmarsh A, Leach V, Davies P. A comparison of two assessment tools
used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2. Syst Rev.
2021;10:273. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Wagner CS, Whetsell TA, Mukherjee S. International research collaboration:
Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Res
Policy. 2019;48:1260-1270. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Ahn R, Woodbridge A, Abraham A, Saba S, Korenstein D, Madden E, et al.
Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial
outcomes: cross sectional study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2017;356:i6770. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature.
2005;435:737-738. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Zhang Y, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. Using systematic reviews in guideline
development: the GRADE approach. Res Synt Methods. 2018:1-18. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
Neill US. Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Investig.
2008;118:2368. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Else H, Van Noorden R. The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out
sham science. Nature. 2021;591:516-519. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Bohannon J. Who's afraid of peer review? Science (New York). 2013;342:60-65. |
|
|
|
|
|
30.
Van Noorden R. Hundreds of gibberish papers still lurk in the scientific
literature. Nature. 2021;594:160-161. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.
Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical
support from US States Data. PloS One. 2010;4:e10271. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.
Tiokhin L, Yan M, Morgan T. Competition for priority harms the reliability of
science, but reforms can help. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:857-867. |
|
|
|
|
|
33.
Sarewitz D. The pressure to publish pushes down quality. Nature.
2016;533:147. |
|
|
|
|
|
34.
Manfredini D, Greene CS, J Ahlberg, De Laat A, Lobbezoo F, Klasser GD.
Evidence-based dentistry or meta-analysis illness? A commentary on current
publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism. J
Oral Rehabil. 2019;46:1-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
35.
Gates M, Gates A, Duarte G, Cary M, Becker M, Prediger B, et al. Quality and
risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across
reviewers and centers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;125:9-15. |
|