Effect of deep margin elevation on fracture resistance of premolars restored with ceramic onlay: In vitro comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(6):e446-53.

 

doi:10.4317/jced.60384

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60384

__________

 

References

1. Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int. 2009;40:125-33.

PMid:19169444

 

2. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10:47-54.

PMid:9582662

 

3. Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira EC. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:52-61.
https://doi.org/10.2341/18-098-L
PMid:31084532

 

4. Garoushi S, Gargoum A, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9:12330.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12330
PMid:29479830

 

5. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:63-70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
PMid:12768463

 

6. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:71-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0201-z
PMid:12740693

 

7. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:433-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018
PMid:17174661

 

8. Reich S, Endres L, Weber C, Wiedhahn K, Neumann P, Schneider O, et al. Three-unit CAD/CAM-generated lithium disilicate FDPs after a mean observation time of 46 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:2171-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1191-8
PMid:24493230

 

9. AL-Makramani BM, Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI. Evaluation of load at fracture of Procera AllCeram copings using different luting cements. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:120-4.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00270.x
PMid:18047490

 

10. Forster A, Braunitzer G, Tóth M, Szabó BP, Fráter M. In vitro fracture resistance of adhesively restored molar teeth with different MOD cavity dimensions. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:325-31.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12777
PMid:29508474

 

11. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:576-85.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00721.x
PMid:11422685

 

12. Vertolli TJ, Martinsen BD, Hanson CM, Howard RS, Kooistra S, Ye L. Effect of deep margin elevation on CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:608-17.
https://doi.org/10.2341/18-315-L
PMid:32243253

 

13. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:993-1000.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009
PMid:24874951

 

14. Yap AUJ, Pandya M, Toh WS. Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:503-10.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-402
PMid:27252008

 

15. Lassila L, Säilynoja E, Prinssi R, Vallittu P, Garoushi S. Characterization of a new fiber-reinforced flowable composite. Odontology. 2019;107:342-52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0405-y
PMid:30617664 PMCid:PMC6557871

 

16. Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34:598-606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.002
PMid:29366493

 

17. Findakly MB, Jasim HH. Influence of preparation design on fracture resistance of different monolithic zirconia crowns: A comparative study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11:324-330.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.324
PMid:31897271 PMCid:PMC6933051

 

18. Zhang H, Li H, Cong Q, Zhang Z, Du A, Wang Y. Effect of proximal box elevation on fracture resistance and microleakage of premolars restored with ceramic endocrowns. Plos One. 2021;16:1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258038
PMid:34555128 PMCid:PMC8459976

 

19. Guess PC, Schultheis S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110:264-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60374-1
PMid:24079561

 

20. Bresser RA, van de Geer L, Gerdolle D, Schepke U, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103950
PMid:32957242

 

21. de Azevedo Cubas GB, Habekost L, Camacho GB, Pereira-Cenci T. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55:53-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001
PMid:20934401

 

22. Yoon HI, Sohn PJ, Jin S, Elani H, Lee SJ. Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated lithium disilicate MOD inlays and onlays with various cavity preparation designs. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:524-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12787
PMid:29533499

 

23. Jasim HH, Findakly MB, Mahdi NA, Mutar MT. Effect of Reduced Occlusal Thickness with Two Margin Designs on Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Eur J Dent. 2020;14:245-249.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709342
PMid:32503065 PMCid:PMC7274823

 

24. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1021-8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1325-z
PMid:25248949

 

25. Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2009;12:154-9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.58338
PMid:20543925 PMCid:PMC2879728

 

26. Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, Ersoy M, Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2003;28:628-34.

PMid:14531611

 

27. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:642-9.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.125179
PMid:12131887

 

28. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1356-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.017
PMid:17204319

 

29. Shouha P, Swain M, Ellakwa A. The effect of fiber aspect ratio and volume loading on the flexural properties of flowable dental composite. Dent Mater. 2014;30:1234-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.363
PMid:25236331

 

30. Lassila L, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Characterization of restorative short-fiber reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:992-9.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-088
PMid:32779605