Karveli A, Papazoglou E, Koletsi D, Anagnostou M. Surface profile characterization of prefabricated resin composite veneers following simulated abrasion. An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(10):e796-803.

doi:10.4317/jced.60420

_________

References

1. Lohbauer U, Belli R, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in mechanical fatigue degradation of dental resin composites. J Dent Res. 2013;92:584-591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513490734 PMid:23694927

2. Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Oper Dent. 2018;43:E173-E190. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-208-T PMid:29570020

3. Farzaneh F, Mohammadi-Bassir M, Rezvani MB, Dehestani Ardakani F. Effect of Chemical and Mechanical Degradation on Surface Roughness, Topography, Gloss, and Polish Retention of Three Composites Polished with Five Polishing Systems. Front Dent. 2021;18:39. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i39.7608 PMid:35965698 PMCid:PMC9355858

4. Araujo E, Perdigão J. Anterior Veneer Restorations - An Evidence-based Minimal-Intervention Perspective. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23:91-110. PMid:33825424

5. Dietschi D, Devigus A. Prefabricated composite veneers: historical perspectives, indications and clinical application. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6:178-187. PMid:21734966

6. Gomes G, Perdigão J. Prefabricated composite resin veneers--a clinical review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26:302-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12114 PMid:24942614

7. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez IV, Loguercio AD. Prefabricated veneers - bond strengths and ultramorphological analyses. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:137-146. PMid:24179983

8. Singh I, Shetty R, Mehta D, Lampl S, Chida N. Prefabricated Laser Sintered Composite Veneers and Occlusal Vertical Dimensions: Case Reports. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:1417-1423. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2442 PMid:30602651

9. Dederichs M, Fahmy MD, An H, Guentsch A, Viebranz S, Kuepper H. Comparison of Wear Resistance of Prefabricated Composite Veneers Versus Ceramic and Enamel. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:711-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13303 PMid:33617152

10. Ohrvik HG, Hjortsjö C. Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6:16-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.243 PMid:32067400 PMCid:PMC7025981

11. Dua P, Londhe SM, Dua G, Kotwal A, Gupta S. Clinical evaluation of "componeers" and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20:424-430. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_95_20 PMid:33487971 PMCid:PMC7814685

12. Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimidou O. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46:e18. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18 PMid:34123754 PMCid:PMC8170387

13.https://www.edelweissdentistry.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/814022-2022-01_Sales_Brochure_EN_small.pdf, 2023 (assessed 29 January 2023)

14. https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/v000397482/, 2023, (assessed 29 January 2023)

15. Cengiz S, Sarac S, Özcan M. Effects of simulated gastric juice on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of laboratory-processed composites. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:343-348. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-265 PMid:24882109

16. Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:510-516. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500003 PMid:23138735 PMCid:PMC3881789

17. Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6:423-430. PMid:23844265 PMCid:PMC3703112

18. International Standards Organization. Technical specification 14569-1. Dental materials guidance on testing of wear resistance. Part 1: wear by tooth brushing. Switzerland: International Standards Organization; 1999.

19. Cavalcante LM, Masouras K, Watts DC, Pimenta LA, Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion. Am J Dent. 2009;22:60-64. PMid:19281115

20. Waheeb N, Silikas N, Watts D. Initial polishing time affects gloss retention in resin composites. Am J Dent. 25;2012:303-306. PMid:23243980

21. Takahashi R, Jin J, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J. 32;2013:75-82. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-160 PMid:23370873

22. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater. 2010;26:306-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.152 PMid:20036418

23. Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Finger WJ, Kanehira, Endo T, Utterodt A, et al. Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:708-716. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.708 PMid:20019422

24. Hamza B, Attin T, Cucuzza C, Gubler A, Wegehaupt FJ. RDA and REA Values of Commercially Available Toothpastes Utilising Diamond Powder and Traditional Abrasives. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18:807-814. PMid:32895665

25. Pedersen AML, Sørensen CE, Proctor GB, Carpenter GH, Ekström J. Salivary secretion in health and disease. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:730-746. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12664 PMid:29878444

26. Amaya-Pajares SP, Koi K, Watanabe H, da Costa JB, Ferracane JL. Development and maintenance of surface gloss of dental composites after polishing and brushing: Review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34:15-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12875 PMid:35088935

27. Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski KZ, Valandro LF, Zanatta FB. Does Finishing and Polishing of Restorative Materials Affect Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation? A Systematic Review. Oper Dent. 2018;43:E37-E52. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-073-L PMid:29284102

28. Lai G, Zhao L, Wang J, Kunzelmann KH. Surface properties and color stability of dental flowable composites influenced by simulated toothbrushing. Dent Mater J. 2018;37:717-724. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-233 PMid:29998939

29. Ota M, Ando S, Endo H, Ogura Y, Miyazaki M, Hosoya Y. Influence of refractive index on optical parameters of experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70:362-367. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.600724 PMid:21780980

30. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater. 2006;22:146-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013 PMid:16084582

31. Shimokawa C, Giannini M, André CB, Sahadi BO, Faraoni JJ, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. In Vitro Evaluation of Surface Properties and Wear Resistance of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites After Brushing With a Dentifrice. Oper Dent. 2019;44:637-647. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-200-L PMid:30702404

32. Dennis T, Zoltie T, Wood D, Altaie A. Reduced-step composite polishing systems - a new gold standard? J Dent. 2021;112:103769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103769 PMid:34363894